President Trump has called for the arrest and execution of several members of Congress for reminding military personnel to disobey unlawful orders. This follows a campaign by the Trump administration to target alleged drug smugglers, which many legal experts deem unlawful. American military tradition and law permit and even require soldiers to question and disobey orders perceived as unlawful, a principle reinforced by international law and the U.S. Constitution. Therefore, the actions of the President and Defense Secretary Hegseth in ignoring this principle betray a shocking misunderstanding of the legal and moral responsibility of the American military.
Read More
The Pentagon announced an investigation into Democratic Senator Mark Kelly, a retired Navy captain, due to “serious allegations of misconduct.” This probe comes amid President Donald Trump’s criticism of Kelly and five other Democratic lawmakers for a video advising service members to disobey illegal orders. Because Kelly is retired from the Navy, he could be recalled to active duty, potentially facing a court-martial. Legal experts and others have criticized Trump’s actions, with some calling them an abuse of power.
Read More
Following a video from Democratic lawmakers urging soldiers to refuse “unlawful” orders, Donald Trump ignited controversy by accusing them of “sedition” and calling for their arrest, sparking outrage among military legal professionals. These experts criticize Trump’s broad and inappropriate use of legal terms while simultaneously expressing concern over the safety of lawmakers. Although many agree that some orders, such as the US’s actions against alleged drug trafficking boats, may be illegal, military attorneys warn of the immense burden placed on service members who refuse orders and stress the need for clarification and guidance. Furthermore, the politicization of the military is highlighted as a dangerous trend, putting junior service members in a precarious position and potentially leading to a breakdown in the core principle that every order is presumed lawful.
Read More
The Democrats’ video serves as an act of patriotism, signaling to government officials that some lawmakers are upholding the law and monitoring potential dangers arising from Trump’s orders. This action is especially relevant regarding the military, where Congress maintains regulatory authority. Democrats are attempting oversight in the absence of Republican cooperation, aiming to spark a necessary public debate on whether Trump’s actions constitute illegal orders. Therefore, any criticism of this intervention is misplaced, as the debate is crucial, and the Democrats intend to pursue it regardless.
Read More
In a recent video, six Democratic lawmakers with military or intelligence backgrounds reminded active-duty personnel they can refuse illegal orders, citing concerns about threats to the Constitution. This triggered an extreme response from the right, including former President Trump, who suggested the lawmakers’ actions were punishable by death. The lawmakers were simply reiterating service members’ oath to defend the Constitution and the right to refuse unlawful orders. Trump’s reaction is particularly concerning given his past actions and willingness to politicize the military, making the lawmakers’ warning a necessary one.
Read More
President Trump responded to a video featuring Democratic lawmakers appealing to military and intelligence personnel to “refuse illegal orders,” by demanding their arrest for “seditious behavior.” The video, featuring lawmakers who are themselves veterans, urged service members to uphold the Constitution amid concerns over the legality of federal troop deployments and other actions. Trump’s accusations reflect ongoing tensions between Republicans and Democrats, each accusing the other of undermining democracy. The Democrats’ message emphasized the importance of refusing unlawful orders and standing up for the Constitution.
Read More
A Russian spy ship, the Yantar, has been operating near UK waters, entering the UK’s exclusive economic zone multiple times in recent weeks. During these incursions, the vessel directed lasers at British military pilots, a significant escalation according to UK officials. The UK government, considering this “deeply dangerous,” is monitoring the ship and has military options prepared. The defense secretary has also stated this is part of a pattern of Russian incursions into NATO territory, and the government is increasing defense spending in response. The Russian embassy has responded by accusing the British government of Russophobia.
Read More
British Defence Secretary John Healey reported that a Russian spy ship, the Yantar, entered the UK’s waters and directed lasers at military aircraft monitoring its movements. Healey warned Russia of the UK’s readiness if the vessel proceeds further south. This incident is part of a pattern of provocations, as NATO observes Russia testing the alliance’s resolve amid escalating tensions. Additionally, a NATO ally, Poland, accused Russia of sabotaging a key rail line, and Romania reported a Russian drone violating its airspace.
Read More
Ukraine’s military announced that it successfully struck military targets within Russia using US-supplied ATACMS missiles, a significant development in the ongoing conflict. This marks the first public acknowledgment of using these advanced ballistic missile systems against Russian territory, following the lifting of previous restrictions by the Biden administration in late 2024. Kyiv received the ATACMS in 2023 but was initially limited to using them within its own borders. Ukraine has also expressed interest in acquiring Tomahawk missiles, which have a longer range, to further pressure Russia.
Read More
Russia loses eyes over Crimea, fuel, military echelon, troop concentration—all in Ukraine’s four-target operation: It seems like the narrative surrounding the recent Ukrainian operations is centered on a four-pronged assault that has significantly impacted Russia’s military capabilities and strategic assets. This assessment isn’t just a casual observation; it’s a synthesis of how these events are perceived.
Losing Russia’s eyes over Crimea, specifically their Nebo-U radar, which was designed to spot aircraft and other targets at long ranges, is a major blow. This radar was supposed to be a key component in Russia’s air defense network, able to detect threats hundreds of kilometers away.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood