Senator Sanders criticized his colleagues’ hypocrisy in prioritizing a near-$1 trillion military budget while simultaneously claiming insufficient funds for addressing critical national issues like housing and healthcare. He highlighted the consistent rejection of funding for social programs despite readily approving massive military spending. This occurred shortly before the Senate overwhelmingly passed the $895 billion National Defense Authorization Act, a vote Sanders opposed. Sanders argued that this prioritization reflects undue influence from the military-industrial complex, urging a shift towards investing in the needs of working families.
Read More
The House passed the $895 billion 2025 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which includes a pay raise for service members and significant military funding for Israel. However, the NDAA also incorporates restrictive measures barring the use of Department of Defense funds for gender-affirming care, including surgeries and hormone therapy for minors. These provisions, found in Sections 708 and 709, are based on misleading claims about the effects of such treatments. Despite the bill’s controversial elements, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries allowed a member-by-member vote, resulting in bipartisan support for its passage.
Read More
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte warned that Russia, under Vladimir Putin, aims to subjugate Ukraine and potentially other European nations, urging a “wartime mindset” and increased defense spending. He highlighted Russia’s escalating aggression, including drone warfare, cyberattacks, and the weaponization of migration, as evidence of a long-term campaign to destabilize Europe. Rutte stressed the need for significantly higher defense budgets than the current NATO target of 2% of GDP, emphasizing that a swift, unfavorable peace agreement with Ukraine would embolden Putin. He further underscored that Europe is unprepared for the escalating threats and needs immediate action to bolster defenses.
Read More
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte declared the alliance unprepared for future Russian threats, urging a “wartime mindset” and significantly increased defense spending beyond the current 2% GDP target. He stressed that Russia is preparing for long-term conflict, and current security is the worst in his lifetime. Rutte called for increased defense production, removal of inter-member barriers to bolster defense capabilities, and acknowledged the need to address threats from China’s growing military power. He emphasized the urgent need for increased spending and innovation within the defense industry.
Read More
Senator Sanders opposes the nearly $850 billion National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2025, citing the excessive military spending while many Americans face economic hardship. He highlights the potential for “disastrous misplaced power” within the military-industrial complex, echoing Eisenhower’s warnings. Sanders points to rampant fraud, waste, and cost overruns within the defense industry, citing examples of major contractors’ overcharging and fines. The NDAA’s passage remains uncertain, though opposition is expected less due to the budget size and more because of controversial provisions targeting transgender healthcare for minors.
Read More
Despite Congressional authorization of billions, the Biden administration will likely not fully utilize the $6.8 billion allocated for arming Ukraine before the end of its term due to limitations in US weapons stockpiles and production capacity. While efforts are underway to increase monthly aid packages to approximately $1 billion, this accelerated pace still leaves significant funds unused. This shortfall comes despite a concerted effort to replenish supplies and a pledge to provide Ukraine with necessary capabilities. The incoming Trump administration will then decide the future of military aid to Ukraine.
Read More
Europeans will ramp up military support for Ukraine, a move driven by a growing recognition of Russia’s aggressive actions and the limitations of relying solely on the United States for global security. The need for increased European defense spending has become undeniable, reflecting a shift in geopolitical realities. A prolonged conflict necessitates sustained support for Ukraine, a commitment extending beyond mere financial aid. This escalation of military assistance acknowledges that the current situation demands a more robust and self-reliant European defense posture.
Europeans are recognizing the need for a significant increase in defense spending, a shift prompted by a clearer understanding of the long-term consequences of inaction.… Continue reading
The EU’s new defense commissioner, Andrius Kubilius, emphasizes the need for increased defense spending within the bloc, citing the ongoing threat from Russia rather than pressure from the US. This call for rearmament comes in light of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the anticipated return of Donald Trump to power in the US, whose past pronouncements on European defense spending have caused concern. Kubilius highlights the urgency of this need, emphasizing the need for the EU to be prepared for potential military aggression from Russia. While acknowledging the desire for peace, Kubilius argues that strengthening EU defenses is essential to deter any hostile actions and ensure stability.
Read More
Russia’s war-driven economy has reached scorching levels, as the World Bank has recently upgraded it to a ‘high-income country’. This may seem like a cause for celebration at first glance, with the GDP soaring due to increased military spending and production. However, delving deeper into the heart of this war economy reveals a stark truth that cannot be ignored.
In a situation where resources are funneled into the production of war machinery, the immediate boost to the economy is undeniable. But this prosperity comes at a high cost, both in terms of financial sustainability and human lives. The war economy model, reminiscent of historical instances like Fascist economies in the 1930s, is akin to a short-term diet that leads to long-term consequences.… Continue reading
As the news breaks that the United States plans to provide Ukraine with an additional $2 billion in military financing, I can’t help but feel conflicted about this decision. On one hand, I understand the importance of supporting Ukraine in its struggle against Russian aggression. The Ukrainian people deserve the right to defend themselves and protect their sovereignty. However, on the other hand, I can’t ignore the fact that this funding ultimately benefits US military contractors more than anyone else.
It’s disheartening to think that a substantial portion of this $2 billion will end up in the pockets of arms manufacturers and defense industry giants.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood