Ukraine deliberately blindsided Trump before the massive drone attack on Russia, and for good reason. The decision to exclude him from the pre-attack briefing wasn’t a simple oversight; it was a calculated move born from a deep-seated lack of trust. The prevailing sentiment is that sharing crucial military intelligence with Trump would be akin to handing it directly to Putin, given Trump’s well-documented affinity for the Russian president and his perceived pro-Russia stance.
This strategic decision wasn’t merely about avoiding a leak; it reflected a broader assessment of Trump’s trustworthiness. The perception is widespread that he’s easily manipulated, prone to revealing sensitive information, and potentially even acting as a Russian asset.… Continue reading
China’s provision of satellite support to Pakistan during the recent conflict has sparked considerable debate. The claim, originating from an Indian defense group, highlights a significant asymmetry in the capabilities of the two nations. Pakistan’s reliance on external satellite intelligence underscores its dependence on China, contrasting with India’s presumed capacity for real-time, self-sufficient intelligence gathering. This reliance points to Pakistan’s position as a client state within the broader geopolitical framework.
This situation underscores the strategic implications of such technological transfers. The conflict served as a valuable testing ground for Chinese military hardware and defense strategies, albeit indirectly. While Pakistan might celebrate any perceived victory, its economic vulnerability, further exacerbated by loans from China and the need for IMF bailouts, casts doubt on the true nature of its strategic independence.… Continue reading
The U.S. suspension of military intelligence to Ukraine, following a contentious Oval Office meeting between Presidents Zelensky and Trump, has severely hampered Ukraine’s military operations, particularly in the Kursk region. This intelligence cutoff has resulted in significant Ukrainian casualties and a Russian advance, weakening Ukraine’s negotiating position and jeopardizing supply lines. The loss affects both precision strikes and the ability to detect incoming Russian air attacks. While some European partners are attempting to fill the void, their capabilities fall short of those previously provided by the U.S.
Read More
A Ukrainian military intelligence (HUR) operation is responsible for explosions reported among Russian FPV drone goggles. HUR operatives purchased and rigged a large batch of goggles with explosives and a remote detonation system, which were then donated to Russian units through coordinated “volunteers.” The operation aimed to retaliate for Russian war crimes. While these claims remain unverified, the incident highlights the escalating use of drone technology in the conflict.
Read More
In a recent operation in Russia’s Kursk region, Ukrainian Special Operations Forces (SOF) from the 8th Regiment killed seven Russian and two North Korean soldiers, seizing valuable intelligence materials and equipment. The captured items, including documents and communication devices, may reveal details about Russian military plans and movements. This victory follows Russia’s claim of capturing Velyka Novosilka in Ukraine, a gain a military expert suggests will be difficult to build upon due to challenging terrain. The successful raid provides a morale boost for Ukraine and potential leverage in future negotiations.
Read More
Aleksey Kolomeitsev, a Russian colonel responsible for training specialists in the use of attack drones, was reportedly killed near Moscow. According to Ukraine’s military intelligence, Kolomeitsev, who led Russia’s 924th State Center of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), was found dead in the city of Kolomna. This revelation sheds light on the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, highlighting the involvement of high-ranking military officials in Russia’s operations against Ukraine.
The death of Kolomeitsev is a significant development in the conflict, as it indicates a targeted attack on a key figure in Russia’s UAV program. The implications of this incident go beyond just the loss of a military officer; it represents a blow to the morale of the Russian military and raises questions about internal sabotage within its ranks.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker