Russia’s recent failed missile test exposes deep flaws within its military-industrial complex, undermining its strategic deterrence and the credibility of its nuclear threats. This incident, following a previous devastating missile strike in November 2024, reveals vulnerabilities in even Russia’s most advanced weaponry. The failure casts doubt on the effectiveness of Russia’s intimidation tactics, which rely heavily on the perceived power of its arsenal. Consequently, the myth of Russian military invincibility is eroding as its actions increasingly contradict its boasts. This weakening of Russia’s perceived strength contrasts sharply with the strengthening defenses of Ukraine and its allies.
Read More
Ukraine’s remarkable resilience in the face of Russian aggression has made it a potent force, a fact that renders any notion of “selling out” Ukraine utterly absurd. The sheer scale of Ukraine’s drone production, numbering in the millions annually, is a testament to its burgeoning military-industrial capacity. These drones, largely responsible for a significant percentage of battlefield kills inflicted on Russia, highlight a level of technological prowess and manufacturing capability that shouldn’t be underestimated.
This advanced drone program, coupled with the Ukrainian military’s unparalleled combat experience – arguably the most seasoned fighting force in the world today – makes the idea of abandoning Ukraine strategically disastrous.… Continue reading
Europe paying for US-supplied arms to Ukraine is a complex issue, sparking a range of opinions and concerns. The core idea, as presented, is that while Europe will foot the bill for these weapons, the US defense industry will reap the rewards, securing contracts and credit.
This arrangement raises valid concerns about potential vulnerabilities. Imagine a scenario where relations between the US and Europe sour; Europe would be left with a hefty bill but lacking the means to adequately defend itself, possessing only the arms purchased at a premium. This highlights the urgent need for Europe to bolster its own defense industry, significantly increasing investment in its capacity to produce arms independently.… Continue reading
Senator Sanders criticized his colleagues’ hypocrisy in prioritizing a near-$1 trillion military budget while simultaneously claiming insufficient funds for addressing critical national issues like housing and healthcare. He highlighted the consistent rejection of funding for social programs despite readily approving massive military spending. This occurred shortly before the Senate overwhelmingly passed the $895 billion National Defense Authorization Act, a vote Sanders opposed. Sanders argued that this prioritization reflects undue influence from the military-industrial complex, urging a shift towards investing in the needs of working families.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood