More than twice as many U.S. troops are currently stationed in Syria than previously acknowledged by official government reports. This revelation significantly alters the perceived scale of American military involvement in the region and raises questions about transparency and accountability.
The discrepancy between the reported numbers and the actual deployment is substantial, possibly even exceeding a fourfold increase depending on the interpretation of “twice as many.” This suggests a considerable gap between public understanding and the reality on the ground. It’s not simply a matter of a few extra soldiers; we’re talking about a potentially massive difference in troop presence.
Adding to the complexity of the situation are the numerous contractors operating in Syria.… Continue reading
The surfacing of two oarfish in California this year, a rare event interpreted in Japanese legend as a harbinger of disaster, coincides with unsettling news. Simultaneously, a Trump transition team reportedly plans to investigate and potentially criminally charge military leaders involved in the Afghanistan withdrawal. Adding to the unease, the selection of Chris Wright, a climate change skeptic, as Energy Secretary and Brendan Carr, an opponent of broadband expansion, as FCC chairman, further exacerbates concerns. These events, coupled with the oarfish sightings, suggest a confluence of ominous developments.
Read More
The recent news of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy firing his Air Force commander, Mykola Oleshchuk, has caused quite a stir. This decision came just a day after the announcement of the tragic death of one of Ukraine’s top pilots in an F-16 crash. The timing of these events raises questions and concerns about the state of Ukraine’s military operations and the accountability of those in top positions.
The loss of an F-16 fighter jet and the death of a skilled pilot are significant blows, especially in a time when Ukraine is fighting for its survival against Russian aggression. It’s understandable that Zelenskyy felt the need to take swift action to signal that there is no room for mistakes or hesitations at the top levels of command.… Continue reading
The recent news of Israel dismissing two officers over deadly drone strikes on aid workers in Gaza has sparked outrage and conversation around the world. As someone who values fairness, justice, and human rights, this incident hits close to home for me. The fact that these officers authorized lethal drone strikes based on incomplete and inaccurate information is deeply concerning. It raises questions about the accountability and decision-making processes within the Israeli army.
The military’s rules of engagement require officers to have more than one reason for identifying someone as a target before launching an attack. In this case, a colonel authorized the deadly strikes based on the observation of a single major, who claimed to have seen someone in the convoy carrying a weapon.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker