In response to Senator Mark Kelly’s video reminding military personnel of their duty to disobey illegal orders, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth is attempting to recall the Senator back to active duty for a court-martial. The author contends that while Hegseth may be correct in questioning Kelly’s role in Congress, the real issue lies in Hegseth’s inadequacy for his position. The article argues that Kelly, with his extensive military and astronaut experience, would be a more suitable choice for Secretary of Defense than Hegseth, who is portrayed as lacking the necessary qualifications and displaying questionable behavior. Ultimately, the piece concludes that the current administration should seek a more qualified individual to fill the role of Secretary of Defense.
Read More
Following reports of potentially unlawful airstrikes in the Caribbean, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth posted a cartoon depicting Franklin the Turtle targeting “narco terrorists,” a move deemed childish and unprofessional. This post was made in the context of increasing scrutiny over the administration’s actions, including allegations of a second strike against survivors, potentially constituting a war crime. Regardless of the legal justifications for the attacks, Hegseth’s post, which also sends a poor message to the military, is deeply inappropriate and offensive. Investigations are being demanded by congressional leaders concerning the legality of the attacks, and the administration has refused to release requested information.
Read More
A Pentagon watchdog found that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth risked U.S. personnel and mission security by sharing sensitive information about a military strike against Yemen’s Houthi militants via the Signal app. The report concluded that Hegseth violated Pentagon policy by using a personal device for official business, recommending improved training for officials. The investigation was initiated after a journalist was inadvertently added to a Signal chat revealing details, including strike timings. Although Hegseth maintains the information was unclassified, lawmakers raised concerns, with some suggesting that such actions would warrant dismissal for lower-ranking military personnel.
Read More
The central issue revolves around Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and allegations of war crimes, specifically concerning the killing of Venezuelan boat crews. Hegseth is accused of ordering the deaths of those aboard these vessels, with the most damning claim being the order to “kill them all.” Military experts are questioning the legality of these actions, as well as President Trump’s stance on them, particularly concerning the apparent indifference towards the laws of war, and any potential consequences that may arise. Trump’s handling of the situation and whether Hegseth is fired, or worse, indicted, could have far-reaching effects on military morale and civil-military relations, potentially emboldening violations of the law.
Read More
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth is facing scrutiny for a double-tap strike in the Caribbean that resulted in the death of survivors from an initial boat attack. Multiple legal experts and lawmakers suggest that Hegseth’s order to “kill everybody” could lead to investigations for war crimes or murder, as the Pentagon’s Law of War Manual prohibits targeting those who are incapacitated. The attacks, which have resulted in at least 83 civilian deaths, are considered extrajudicial killings, as the targets are suspected drug traffickers. Following the September 2 strike, a government source claimed Hegseth was turning military personnel into “murderers” while the Former JAGs Working Group condemned the actions as war crimes.
Read More
The White House is now deflecting blame for the killing of survivors from a U.S. military strike in the Caribbean, shifting responsibility from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to Admiral Frank Bradley, who ordered the deaths of survivors. Despite the act being a potential war crime, as defined by the Department of Defense, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt maintains it was legal. The incident involved the destruction of a boat allegedly used for drug smuggling, with President Trump claiming the attack killed “narcoterrorists.” However, there is no evidence of fentanyl being found on the boats, and they were not en route to the U.S.
Read More
President Trump has stated that Pete Hegseth denied issuing the order to kill the crew of a boat. Furthermore, the president indicated he would not have authorized a second strike on the vessel after the initial attack, even though two survivors remained. This statement comes after reports surfaced detailing the incident. The President’s comments were released on November 30, 2025 at 8:33 p.m. EST.
Read More
The United States has stationed the USS Gerald Ford and approximately 15,000 troops near Venezuela, claiming the deployment is intended to combat drug trafficking, with President Trump stating action “by land” will begin soon. This follows at least 21 strikes on boats allegedly carrying drugs, though the US has not provided evidence. The Venezuelan government views this as an attempt to remove President Maduro, whose re-election was disputed, and has rejected the US’s recent designation of the “Cartel de los Soles” as a foreign terrorist organization. This designation grants US agencies expanded authority, which Venezuela strongly disputes, with officials dismissing the cartel’s existence.
Read More
Democratic Rep. Ted Lieu has accused Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth of potentially committing a war crime, citing reports that a second strike was ordered to kill survivors of an initial attack on a drug vessel. Lieu stated that a classified DOJ memo and military law do not authorize a second strike against defenseless survivors. The allegations stem from a Washington Post report claiming Hegseth ordered all individuals on the vessel to be killed, leading to a second strike after the first killed nine and destroyed the vessel. While the Pentagon spokesman and Hegseth have denied the report, the accusations raise serious concerns about the legality of the military operation.
Read More
Pete Hegseth’s defense of strikes against alleged drug-smuggling boats, following a *Washington Post* report alleging indiscriminate killings, has been met with a resounding chorus of skepticism and condemnation. His initial response, the now-ubiquitous “fake news” dismissal, immediately sets the tone, revealing a defensive posture rather than a clear denial of the facts presented. It’s a tactic that has become increasingly familiar, and increasingly stale, in the face of uncomfortable truths.
The accusations are serious: Hegseth and potentially other senior military leaders are being implicated in extrajudicial killings, with the *Washington Post* suggesting a pattern of violence against individuals accused of drug trafficking.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood