A White House investigation revealed that National Security Advisor Mike Waltz inadvertently included journalist Jeffrey Goldberg in a Signal group chat discussing Yemen strikes. This resulted from a series of errors beginning with Goldberg emailing the Trump campaign, his number being forwarded to Waltz, and ultimately being saved incorrectly on Waltz’s phone. Though Trump briefly considered firing Waltz, he ultimately decided against it, partly to avoid giving the Atlantic satisfaction. The incident prompted a forensic review, which highlighted the use of Signal for sensitive discussions due to a lack of secure alternative platforms.
Read More
National Security Advisor Mike Waltz used unsecured Gmail for official government business, a practice drawing criticism given his past condemnation of Hillary Clinton’s private email server. This contrasts sharply with the Trump administration’s own use of Signal, a platform exposed in “Signalgate” for transmitting sensitive information. Social media users highlighted the perceived hypocrisy, noting the lack of similar outrage directed at Waltz compared to the intense criticism leveled against Clinton. The incident reignited the debate surrounding the use of private communication channels for official government business and the application of security protocols.
Read More
National Security Advisor Mike Waltz’s use of Signal, the app at the center of “Signalgate,” extended beyond the infamous Yemen strike chat. He reportedly used the app for multiple group chats discussing sensitive national security matters with Trump administration officials, including conversations about Russia-Ukraine peace negotiations and military operations. While President Trump’s anger stemmed primarily from Waltz’s contact with a journalist he dislikes, the incident raised concerns about the handling of classified information. The White House has not yet commented on these new revelations regarding the scope of Waltz’s Signal usage.
Read More
Following a review, the White House declared the matter closed regarding Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg’s unintentional inclusion in a sensitive Signal group chat involving high-ranking officials. No classified information was compromised, according to the White House. Measures have been implemented to prevent similar incidents. National Security Advisor Mike Waltz remains in his position.
Read More
National Security Adviser Mike Waltz’s use of Signal to discuss sensitive matters, including peace negotiations and military operations with cabinet officials, has raised concerns about national security and record-keeping. The app’s auto-delete function violates federal record preservation laws, prompting a lawsuit and bipartisan calls for investigation. While Waltz and other officials deny sharing classified information, the incident highlights vulnerabilities in secure communication at the highest levels of government. The potential for intelligence breaches and the ongoing legal challenges threaten Waltz’s position.
Read More
Following a Meet the Press interview discussing a Signal group chat controversy involving National Security Advisor Mike Waltz and journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, President Trump criticized NBC and the show on Truth Social. Trump accused the network of prioritizing a “witch hunt” over substantive issues like peace talks and military successes, further alleging that NBC employs dishonest journalists at the behest of a weak chairman. Goldberg, during the interview, refuted Waltz’s denials of their acquaintance and highlighted the risks associated with sharing sensitive military information via an unsecure app. Trump dismissed the entire matter as a politically motivated attack aimed at undermining his administration’s achievements.
Read More
Texts from National Security Advisor Mike Waltz and CIA Director John Ratcliffe, exchanged in a group chat including Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg, revealed sensitive intelligence-gathering details about the Houthis. This included information about the CIA’s surveillance methods and specific targets, potentially compromising future intelligence operations. Current and former officials sharply disagree with claims that no classified information was shared, asserting the messages exposed sources and methods. The use of the unclassified Signal app for such sensitive discussions is also raising concerns within the intelligence community.
Read More
A YouGov poll reveals that 74% of Americans consider the Signalgate incident—the discussion of Yemen strike plans on a messaging app including a journalist—a serious problem, with even 60% of Republicans agreeing. While the White House dismisses the matter, some prominent Republicans, like Tomi Lahren, are urging the administration to acknowledge the error. Senator Ted Cruz called the journalist’s inclusion a mistake but rejected calls for an investigation. Growing pressure is mounting on Trump to dismiss National Security Advisor Mike Waltz for his role in the incident.
Read More
National Security Adviser Mike Waltz denies knowing journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, claiming he wouldn’t recognize him, despite Goldberg’s assertion of having met Waltz twice. However, a 2021 photograph shows both men together at a book launch, contradicting Waltz’s statement. Waltz attributed Goldberg’s inclusion in a top-secret group chat to a technical issue or hacking, a claim met with skepticism. Following the leak of sensitive information, President Trump, reportedly angered by the incident, tasked Waltz with investigating the matter.
Read More
A publicly accessible Venmo account belonging to National Security Advisor Michael Waltz revealed hundreds of his personal and professional contacts, including journalists, military officials, and lobbyists, posing a significant national security risk. This account, linked to other accounts of White House officials like Susie Wiles and Walker Barrett, exposed participants in a sensitive Signal group chat discussing a Yemen strike. Following WIRED’s inquiry, the accounts were made private. Experts cite this as part of a larger pattern of reckless behavior by senior administration officials regarding the handling of sensitive information.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker