Recent photographs reveal that high-ranking White House officials, including the former national security advisor Mike Waltz, are using a modified version of the Signal app called TM SGNL. This modified app, created by TeleMessage, allows for message archiving, potentially compromising the end-to-end encryption of the original Signal app. The use of TM SGNL may be an attempt to comply with record-keeping laws, but raises concerns about the security of sensitive communications. Following the publication of the photographs, Waltz was removed from his position as national security advisor.
Read More
Following the “Signalgate” controversy, former National Security Advisor Mike Waltz was photographed using the encrypted messaging app Signal during a Cabinet meeting, despite warnings from President Trump. This, coupled with the inadvertent inclusion of a journalist in a sensitive Signal group chat, led to Waltz’s dismissal. Simultaneously, his deputy was also removed. However, President Trump subsequently nominated Waltz as the next U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations.
Read More
Fired National Security Advisor Mike Waltz’s tenure ended after a photograph revealed his use of Signal, an unapproved messaging app, during his final cabinet meeting. The image showed ongoing communications with Vice President JD Vance and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, further highlighting security concerns. This incident follows a previous leak where Waltz mistakenly included a journalist in a sensitive group chat, contributing to his short 101-day term. Despite White House Communications Director Steven Cheung’s defense of Signal’s use, Waltz’s repeated lapses ultimately led to his dismissal and subsequent appointment as UN ambassador.
Read More
White House National Security Adviser Mike Waltz’s departure is generating considerable buzz, leaving many wondering about the reasons behind his surprisingly short tenure. It seems the 100-day mark has become a significant milestone, marking the end of Waltz’s time in the administration.
The timing raises questions, particularly given the ongoing investigations and controversies swirling around the administration. Speculation abounds regarding the reasons for his exit; some suggest his involvement in a Signal chat with a journalist, potentially involving classified information, played a role. This journalist, known for reporting on previous controversies surrounding the former president, could be a key factor.
The situation is further complicated by Waltz’s alleged sharing of classified information, not just once, but twice.… Continue reading
A White House investigation revealed that National Security Advisor Mike Waltz inadvertently included journalist Jeffrey Goldberg in a Signal group chat discussing Yemen strikes. This resulted from a series of errors beginning with Goldberg emailing the Trump campaign, his number being forwarded to Waltz, and ultimately being saved incorrectly on Waltz’s phone. Though Trump briefly considered firing Waltz, he ultimately decided against it, partly to avoid giving the Atlantic satisfaction. The incident prompted a forensic review, which highlighted the use of Signal for sensitive discussions due to a lack of secure alternative platforms.
Read More
National Security Advisor Mike Waltz used unsecured Gmail for official government business, a practice drawing criticism given his past condemnation of Hillary Clinton’s private email server. This contrasts sharply with the Trump administration’s own use of Signal, a platform exposed in “Signalgate” for transmitting sensitive information. Social media users highlighted the perceived hypocrisy, noting the lack of similar outrage directed at Waltz compared to the intense criticism leveled against Clinton. The incident reignited the debate surrounding the use of private communication channels for official government business and the application of security protocols.
Read More
National Security Advisor Mike Waltz’s use of Signal, the app at the center of “Signalgate,” extended beyond the infamous Yemen strike chat. He reportedly used the app for multiple group chats discussing sensitive national security matters with Trump administration officials, including conversations about Russia-Ukraine peace negotiations and military operations. While President Trump’s anger stemmed primarily from Waltz’s contact with a journalist he dislikes, the incident raised concerns about the handling of classified information. The White House has not yet commented on these new revelations regarding the scope of Waltz’s Signal usage.
Read More
Following a review, the White House declared the matter closed regarding Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg’s unintentional inclusion in a sensitive Signal group chat involving high-ranking officials. No classified information was compromised, according to the White House. Measures have been implemented to prevent similar incidents. National Security Advisor Mike Waltz remains in his position.
Read More
National Security Adviser Mike Waltz’s use of Signal to discuss sensitive matters, including peace negotiations and military operations with cabinet officials, has raised concerns about national security and record-keeping. The app’s auto-delete function violates federal record preservation laws, prompting a lawsuit and bipartisan calls for investigation. While Waltz and other officials deny sharing classified information, the incident highlights vulnerabilities in secure communication at the highest levels of government. The potential for intelligence breaches and the ongoing legal challenges threaten Waltz’s position.
Read More
Following a Meet the Press interview discussing a Signal group chat controversy involving National Security Advisor Mike Waltz and journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, President Trump criticized NBC and the show on Truth Social. Trump accused the network of prioritizing a “witch hunt” over substantive issues like peace talks and military successes, further alleging that NBC employs dishonest journalists at the behest of a weak chairman. Goldberg, during the interview, refuted Waltz’s denials of their acquaintance and highlighted the risks associated with sharing sensitive military information via an unsecure app. Trump dismissed the entire matter as a politically motivated attack aimed at undermining his administration’s achievements.
Read More