Kataib Hezbollah, an Iran-backed Shia militia, issued a stark warning to the United States, threatening attacks on US bases across West Asia should the US intervene in the Iran-Israel conflict. The group’s security leader, Abu Ali al-Askari, specifically mentioned targeting key maritime routes and oil ports, in addition to US aircraft. This threat follows a January 2024 drone strike attributed to the group, killing US soldiers. President Trump stated he will decide within two weeks whether to authorize military action against Iran, prioritizing diplomatic solutions while maintaining that military options remain available.
Read More
Amid escalating hostilities between Israel and Iran, the State Department initiated the evacuation of non-essential embassy staff and their families from Israel. A government plane transported some personnel, while others may have departed via land routes. While the ambassador initially announced evacuation plans for private U.S. citizens, the State Department later clarified that no such plans were currently in place, though they are exploring options and providing information to citizens wishing to leave independently. This action, coupled with increased military deployments and presidential warnings of potential U.S. involvement, significantly raises the risk of broader U.S. engagement in the conflict.
Read More
In response to Iran’s missile attacks on Israeli territory, which injured 137 civilians and soldiers, Defence Minister Katz declared that Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei “cannot continue to exist.” This statement follows IDF retaliatory strikes on Iranian targets, including a purported nuclear facility, and escalating exchanges of fire. Katz subsequently ordered intensified attacks on Iranian strategic and government targets, reflecting a broad Israeli consensus to neutralize perceived Iranian threats. Despite international concern, neither side shows willingness to de-escalate, increasing the risk of wider regional conflict.
Read More
Israel claims to have successfully destroyed what it identifies as Iran’s “internal security headquarters.” This assertion, while dramatic, warrants careful consideration given the complexities of the situation and the inherent challenges in independently verifying such claims during a period of heightened military tensions. The timing of this alleged strike, coming amidst a series of back-and-forth missile strikes and a near-total national internet blackout in Iran, strongly suggests a deliberate escalation of conflict.
The reported destruction of the headquarters raises questions about the potential impact on Iran’s ability to maintain internal order and security. The blackout itself may be a direct result of the strike, impacting communication and coordination capabilities, or it could be an independent action taken by the Iranian government to manage the situation.… Continue reading
Following Israel’s strikes on Iran, President Trump initially denied US involvement, expressing hope for a peaceful resolution. However, within days, he shifted to considering major escalation, despite previously advocating de-escalation at the G7 summit. Trump’s current stance is marked by conflicting signals: he simultaneously threatens Iran with devastating military action and urges them to negotiate. This inconsistency leaves allies uncertain of his intentions and raises concerns about the potential for a wider Middle Eastern conflict.
Read More
Following recent Israeli strikes on Iranian military and nuclear sites, the IAEA confirmed damage to two Iranian centrifuge production facilities: the TESA Karaj workshop and the Tehran Research Center. These facilities, previously monitored under the Iran nuclear deal, were involved in the production and testing of advanced centrifuge rotors and components used in uranium enrichment. President Trump is considering military intervention if diplomacy fails, while Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei has warned of severe repercussions should the U.S. engage militarily. International concerns remain high due to Iran’s uranium enrichment levels exceeding civilian needs.
Read More
In a shift from his earlier criticism of Israeli actions in Gaza, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz expressed appreciation for Israel’s attacks on Iran’s nuclear program, viewing them as crucial for broader security interests. He lauded Israel’s courage in confronting this threat, believing the Iranian regime has been significantly weakened. Merz’s statement comes amidst a G7 resolution calling for de-escalation, while acknowledging the ongoing conflict and President Trump’s early departure from the summit to address the situation. His comments highlight a complex European perspective balancing criticism of specific Israeli actions with support for its right to self-defense against significant threats.
Read More
A recent poll revealed a stark reality: only 16% of Americans want the United States involved in a potential war between Israel and Iran. This surprisingly low figure underscores a widespread aversion to further military entanglement in the Middle East, a sentiment that transcends typical political divides.
The overwhelming majority, a full 84%, clearly express a desire to remain uninvolved. This widespread opposition suggests a deep-seated war-weariness, perhaps stemming from decades of costly conflicts in the region and a growing recognition of the human and financial toll such interventions exact.
Even within the Republican party, support for US involvement appears significantly lower than expected.… Continue reading
Amid escalating tensions, Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, issued apocalyptic threats against Israel, vowing a strong response and promising “no mercy.” Simultaneously, Iranian state television hinted at a major upcoming event. In response to these threats and ongoing Israeli-Iranian attacks, including strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, President Trump is reportedly considering a US military strike on Tehran, consulting with security advisors and engaging in dialogue with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. The US has deployed significant military assets to the region, including B-52 bombers and aircraft carriers, while Israel continues its offensive, aiming to cripple Iran’s nuclear and military capabilities.
Read More
US positions military to potentially join Israel’s war with Iran. The situation is incredibly complex, and the potential consequences are far-reaching, impacting not only the immediate players but also global geopolitical stability. The awkwardness of this situation for the Russia-Iran alliance is undeniable, creating a shift in the existing power dynamics.
US positions military to potentially join Israel’s war with Iran, a move that evokes memories of past promises of avoiding Middle Eastern conflicts. The financial implications are staggering, with the potential for contractors to profit immensely from the conflict. This raises questions about the true motivations behind the military deployment and its potential alignment with financial interests.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood