Attorney General Merrick Garland’s handling of the investigation into Donald Trump’s actions surrounding the January 6th insurrection is widely criticized for its delay and perceived lack of decisiveness. While initially focusing on lower-level participants, Garland’s slow response to investigate Trump directly allowed time for the Supreme Court and other actors to hinder subsequent prosecutions. This inaction, coupled with the Supreme Court’s decision in *Trump v. United States*, is argued to have significantly weakened efforts to hold Trump accountable, ultimately contributing to the rise of reactionary forces. The author contends that Garland’s failure to act swiftly represents a significant dereliction of duty.
Read More
House Judiciary Democrats, led by Ranking Member Jamie Raskin, urged Attorney General Garland to release the unreleased portion of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report on President Trump’s handling of classified documents. They argue that the public’s right to know outweighs concerns about ongoing prosecutions of Trump’s co-defendants, suggesting dismissing those charges as a solution to ensure transparency. This recommendation stems from fears that Trump would halt the prosecutions and suppress the report if re-elected. The Justice Department has yet to respond to this request. The first volume of the report detailed Trump’s actions leading up to the January 6th Capitol attack and his promotion of false election fraud claims.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith concluded his investigations into Donald Trump, submitting his reports to Attorney General Merrick Garland and subsequently resigning from the Department of Justice. These investigations involved Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election and his mishandling of classified documents. Following Smith’s resignation, the Justice Department is contesting Trump’s efforts to keep the reports sealed. Despite Judge Cannon dismissing the Mar-a-Lago case, the case against Trump’s co-defendants continues. Trump, throughout the process, repeatedly attacked Smith personally and vowed to fire him if re-elected.
Read More
Attorney General Merrick Garland’s decision to release special counsel Jack Smith’s report on President-elect Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election has sparked controversy. Republicans criticized the move as a political stunt, particularly given the refusal to release a related report on Trump’s handling of classified documents. Conversely, some Democrats lauded the partial release but criticized Garland for a delayed investigation. The differing reactions highlight the highly partisan nature of the situation, with Republicans pointing to the unreleased materials from the Biden investigation as a double standard. The release may also embolden future congressional efforts to challenge executive privilege claims.
Read More
Attorney General Merrick Garland directly countered Judge Cannon’s order preventing the release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report on the 2020 election investigation. Garland argued that co-defendants Nauta and De Oliveira lacked standing to challenge the release of Volume One, which doesn’t name them. He further asserted that no legal basis exists for blocking its release. By limiting the release of Volume Two to Congress, Garland addressed the defendants’ claims of irreparable prejudice, undermining the core of their motion.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith submitted his final report on the Trump investigations to Attorney General Merrick Garland. Garland intends to publicly release volume one, concerning Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election, pending the Eleventh Circuit’s decision on a temporary injunction. Volume two, related to the classified documents case, will remain confidential to protect ongoing co-defendant cases, though limited access will be granted to Congressional leadership. The Justice Department is seeking to vacate the injunction, allowing for immediate release of volume one if the appeals court rules in their favor.
Read More
Garland prepares to release Jack Smith’s report on the 2020 election subversion case against Trump, a development that has generated a wide spectrum of reactions, ranging from impatient anticipation to cynical skepticism. Many express frustration over the perceived delay, questioning why the release isn’t happening sooner, with some believing the report’s impact will be diminished by the timing. The protracted timeline fuels concerns about the effectiveness of the Department of Justice and leads to accusations of foot-dragging.
Garland’s perceived slow pace in releasing the report has prompted intense criticism. Some observers satirically detail the Attorney General’s imagined slow movements, emphasizing the drawn-out process and suggesting deliberate delay tactics.… Continue reading
Trump urges Attorney General Merrick Garland to block the release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s final report, a move that has ignited intense debate. The former president’s request is seen by many as a blatant attempt to suppress potentially damaging information, highlighting a deep-seated distrust in the justice system’s ability to hold powerful individuals accountable.
This request underscores a pattern of behavior where Trump repeatedly attempts to obstruct investigations into his actions. The sheer audacity of the request is remarkable, revealing a profound disregard for transparency and the principles of accountability that should govern public officials. It fuels existing suspicions about a potential cover-up and further erodes public trust.… Continue reading
Following the conclusion of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigations into Donald Trump, Trump’s legal team demanded the Justice Department withhold the final report, citing the Presidential Transition Act and presidential immunity. This request, sent to Attorney General Merrick Garland, intensified calls for the report’s public release. Smith’s report, covering investigations into classified documents and election subversion, was submitted to Garland, who will decide on its public disclosure. Despite Trump’s team’s efforts and a related request to Judge Cannon, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals currently holds jurisdiction over the case.
Read More
Following the announcement of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into Donald Trump’s alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election, several Democrats criticized Attorney General Merrick Garland for a perceived delay in launching the probe. These critics, including Representatives Nadler and Lofgren and Senators Schiff and Smith, argued that the January 6th Committee’s findings should have prompted immediate action, potentially altering the outcome of the 2024 election. Conversely, some Democrats attributed the perceived inaction to Trump’s success in manipulating the narrative surrounding the January 6th attack. Regardless, Special Counsel Smith’s impending report and recommendations will soon be submitted to the Department of Justice.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood