The Trump administration’s equity order, ostensibly aimed at dismantling Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, has resulted in the effective shutdown of West Point’s engineering society chapters. This action reveals a deeper hostility towards non-white men, rather than a genuine commitment to meritocracy. The claim that this is about merit is simply a smokescreen.
The impact goes far beyond West Point. The potential for similar actions at other colleges and universities is deeply concerning. The loss of these societies represents the loss of valuable networking opportunities and supportive communities for students, particularly those from underrepresented groups. These organizations often serve as vital support systems, fostering lifelong friendships and professional connections.… Continue reading
Representative Jasmine Crockett’s recent CNN interview criticized the dismantling of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, arguing that only those who benefit from “failing forward,” like President Trump, support such efforts. Crockett contends that attacks on DEI originate from those who feel threatened by increased competition from historically marginalized groups who have had to work harder to achieve success. This viewpoint sparked backlash on social media, highlighting the ongoing debate surrounding meritocracy and DEI’s role in addressing systemic inequalities. The article ultimately suggests that opposition to DEI stems from a desire to maintain positions of power without demonstrating competence.
Read More
Trump’s executive order dismantling DEI initiatives falsely claims such policies undermine traditional American values, a claim directly contradicted by his own actions and appointments. The order, penned by someone other than Trump himself, ironically champions “merit” while simultaneously promoting unqualified, predominantly white men to positions of power. This pattern is further exemplified by Trump’s past actions, including the dismissal of qualified women and minorities, and his preference for individuals who align with his ideology over those with demonstrable expertise. Ultimately, the order and related actions reveal a prioritization of partisan loyalty and identity over competence and merit.
Read More
This article presents a challenge or quiz to the reader, indicated by the question “Can you pass the test?”. The nature of the test itself is not revealed in the provided text. A call to action encourages reader participation by suggesting they submit tips or information. The context or subject matter of the quiz remains undefined.
Read More
The recent election of Vaughan Gething as the first Black leader of Wales raises some interesting points about representation and diversity in government leadership. For the first time in history, no White man is at the helm of a U.K. government, which is a significant milestone in itself. However, the underlying issue here goes beyond just skin color and delves into the realms of competence, merit, and the criteria by which we judge our leaders.
It is true that the odds of all four U.K. nations having non-White leaders are statistically low, given the demographics of the countries. But should we base our leadership choices solely on race?… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker