The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced a reduction of 10,000 full-time employees, adding to 10,000 voluntary departures, resulting in a workforce reduction from approximately 82,000 to 62,000. This restructuring, including a consolidation of divisions and regional offices, aims to save $1.8 billion annually and prioritize combating chronic illness through initiatives focused on food safety, clean water, and toxin elimination. While HHS assures the continuation of essential services like Medicare and Medicaid, public health experts express concerns about the feasibility of maintaining service levels given existing workloads and potential impacts on state and local health departments. The changes have been met with criticism from unions and health organizations who warn of detrimental effects on public health and healthcare access.
Read More
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) confirmed that House Republicans’ budget blueprint, designed to enable President Trump’s legislative agenda, necessitates drastic cuts to Medicare or Medicaid to meet its spending reduction targets. The CBO’s analysis revealed that, excluding Medicare, the $880 billion target is far beyond the $581 billion in spending under the Energy and Commerce Committee’s purview. This leaves Republicans in a difficult position, as achieving their goal requires either significant cuts to Medicaid or revising their budget resolution. Democrats strongly oppose these potential cuts, framing them as detrimental to working-class Americans. Despite President Trump’s assertions to the contrary, some House Republicans have indicated a willingness to make changes to Medicaid.
Read More
The House of Representatives voted 224-198 to censure Rep. Al Green (D-TX) for disrupting President Trump’s address, with ten Democrats joining Republicans in the censure. Green was removed from the chamber after protesting Trump’s stance on Medicaid cuts, prompting a display of solidarity from fellow Democrats who sang “We Shall Overcome” during the reading of the censure. The censure, a formal expression of disapproval, does not strip Green of his House privileges. This marks the 28th instance of a House member being censured.
Read More
Representative Al Green (D-TX) dramatically interrupted President Trump’s address to Congress, protesting proposed Medicaid cuts and the Republican budget resolution. His actions, involving a cane and shouted objections, drew both criticism and praise, with some Democrats expressing regret at not joining his protest. While Trump’s speech didn’t explicitly mention Medicaid cuts, the budget resolution passed by House Republicans paves the way for significant reductions in social programs. Green’s protest highlighted the Democrats’ opposition to these cuts, even amidst internal divisions regarding the appropriate response.
Read More
During his address to Congress, President Trump highlighted the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE) budget cuts, specifically citing $8 million allegedly spent on “making mice transgender” and $40 million for “improving the social and economic inclusion of sedentary migrants.” He lauded Elon Musk’s leadership of DOGE while simultaneously imposing surprise 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada, sparking trade war concerns. The speech was punctuated by Rep. Al Green’s expulsion for protesting Medicaid cuts and contrasting statements on law and order alongside pardons for January 6th rioters, including those who assaulted police officers. Democrats repeatedly interrupted with chants of “January 6th.”
Read More
The House narrowly passed a budget resolution that includes $2 trillion in spending cuts and $4.5 trillion in tax cuts, despite facing significant backlash. House Speaker Mike Johnson falsely claimed that constituents protesting these cuts at town halls were paid protesters, a claim he later retracted when pressed for evidence. This budget, which would enact the largest Medicaid cut in US history, is causing considerable anxiety among Republicans facing angry voters. The resulting negative headlines have led some GOP leaders to advise skipping town hall meetings altogether.
Read More
President Trump’s earlier assurances of Social Security and Medicare safety are contradicted by his endorsement of a House Republican budget plan. This plan proposes an $880 billion cut to Medicaid to fund tax cuts. The newly implemented DOGE cuts further exacerbate the situation by slashing the Social Security Administration’s budget by half. This drastic reduction will negatively impact the benefits received by millions of Americans. The actions represent a significant shift from prior pronouncements on social programs.
Read More
House Republicans passed a budget resolution enabling massive cuts to Medicaid and SNAP, prompting widespread constituent outrage and calls for town halls to explain the proposed cuts. The resolution, while omitting explicit mention of Medicaid, directs committees to find over $1 trillion in cuts to these programs, effectively targeting them for significant reductions. Despite GOP claims of targeting only “fraud, waste, and abuse,” experts predict draconian cuts impacting tens of millions. This action follows a pattern of unpopular cuts, with polls showing strong opposition even among Trump voters.
Read More
The House Republican budget resolution, passed despite opposition from Democrats and one Republican, initiates a process to drastically cut programs like Medicaid ($880 billion) and SNAP ($230 billion). These cuts will fund proposed tax cuts overwhelmingly benefiting the wealthy. Critics argue the resolution prioritizes the interests of wealthy donors over constituents, while Republicans misleadingly claim the resolution doesn’t explicitly mandate these cuts. The plan, however, represents a first step towards enacting sweeping tax cuts and is already facing significant opposition and criticism due to its potential negative impacts on vulnerable populations.
Read More
Seventy-one percent of Trump voters oppose Medicaid cuts, a statistic that reveals a fascinating internal conflict within a significant segment of the electorate. This seemingly contradictory stance highlights the complex interplay between individual self-interest and broader political affiliations.
This opposition to cuts, however, is specifically targeted at the impact on themselves. The nuance here is critical; the same voters likely support, or at least did not actively oppose, broader Medicaid cuts affecting others. This suggests a selective empathy, a prioritization of personal well-being over a consistent ideology regarding social safety nets.
The assertion that 100% of Trump voters supported Medicaid cuts is a provocative claim.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood