Trump barely won the election. Why doesn’t it feel that way? That’s a question echoing across the political landscape, and it’s one that deserves a thorough examination. The narrow margin of victory, often overshadowed by the sheer volume of noise surrounding the outcome, doesn’t fully capture the resulting political reality.
The overwhelming sense of a significant win, rather than a narrow escape, is heavily influenced by the control the Republican party now wields. They hold power across all three branches of government: the executive, legislative, and judicial. This complete dominance allows them to push through their agenda with minimal opposition, creating the perception of a much stronger mandate than the actual election results suggest.… Continue reading
Donald Trump’s return to power on January 20th necessitates continued, robust reporting. HuffPost remains committed to providing fearless coverage of the new administration. This crucial information will remain freely accessible to all, thanks to reader support. Even those unable to contribute financially can help by creating a free account and logging in.
Read More
Biden’s incredulous response, “Is that a joke?”, perfectly encapsulates the absurdity of the suggestion that Donald Trump deserves credit for a ceasefire agreement reached while he’s out of office. It’s a question that speaks volumes about the current political climate, where the lines between reality and manufactured narratives blur.
The notion that Trump should receive credit is frankly preposterous. The very idea ignores the complexities of international diplomacy and the direct role of the current administration in brokering the deal. It dismisses the painstaking negotiations, the diplomatic maneuvering, and the sheer weight of the office currently occupied by President Biden. To suggest otherwise is to fundamentally misunderstand the process.… Continue reading
Veteran Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin and former White House ethics czar Norm Eisen launched a new publication, The Contrarian, citing concerns about the Post’s compromised independence and its failure to robustly challenge authoritarianism. The publication, described as pro-democracy rather than simply anti-Trump, will feature diverse voices and utilize a Substack platform, offering some free content alongside a paid subscription model. The Contrarian’s launch follows several high-profile departures from the Washington Post, fueled by controversies surrounding owner Jeff Bezos and the newspaper’s perceived reluctance to criticize powerful figures. The founders aim to provide “unshackled media” to combat what they see as an existential threat to American democracy.
Read More
Marc Andreessen, a venture capitalist with significant holdings in companies like Facebook and X, publicly endorsed Donald Trump’s presidential bid, citing personal financial interests in cryptocurrency regulation as his primary motivation. This support, coupled with his investment in Elon Musk’s ventures, has seemingly granted him access and influence within the Trump administration’s efforts to streamline government operations. Andreessen’s involvement includes an “unpaid volunteer” role with the Department of Government Efficiency, suggesting a close relationship with Musk and a strategic investment in shaping future policy. His actions highlight the entanglement of Silicon Valley capital with political influence and the potential for shaping regulatory landscapes to benefit private interests.
Read More
Jennifer Rubin, a Washington Post columnist, resigned, citing Jeff Bezos’s allegedly “bent-knee approach” to President-elect Trump as a threat to American democracy. Rubin’s departure follows other resignations stemming from perceived pro-Trump biases at the Bezos-owned Post and other major media outlets. In her resignation, Rubin accused Bezos and other corporate media owners of prioritizing profit over journalistic integrity and betraying their audience’s trust. She launched a new media outlet, The Contrarian, aiming to provide unbiased commentary.
Read More
Surprise! The media just discovered Bidenomics works. It’s a head-scratcher, isn’t it? After years of seemingly ignoring positive economic indicators, or perhaps actively downplaying them, mainstream media outlets are suddenly reporting on the successes of the Biden administration’s economic policies. This newfound acknowledgment highlights a significant problem: the media’s inherent biases and unreliability as a source of objective information.
The delayed recognition of Bidenomics’ effectiveness underscores the need for a more proactive approach from the Democrats. Simply relying on the media to accurately portray their accomplishments is a naive strategy. This isn’t a new revelation; Republicans have long benefited from a well-oiled propaganda machine that consistently promotes their narrative, regardless of the facts.… Continue reading
Donald Trump’s presidency has exacerbated existing divisions, with partisan viewpoints framing his leadership as either a success or failure, highlighting a growing inability to share a common reality. This polarization is fueled by the proliferation of misinformation and misleading news, amplified by social media algorithms and generative AI, which allows for the easy creation and spread of false narratives. While combating fake news is crucial, research indicates that factually accurate but misleading news has a far greater impact, underscoring the need for solutions that promote critical thinking and transparency in information consumption. Ultimately, restoring a shared understanding requires not only identifying false information but also fostering open dialogue and access to diverse perspectives.
Read More
Following President Trump’s press conference, his renewed calls for annexing Greenland and Panama, and renaming the Gulf of Mexico sparked predictable reactions. While some Republicans celebrated his “big visions,” media figures downplayed the seriousness of his threats, attributing them to “branding” or “trolling.” This “sanewashing,” as some critics call it, minimizes the danger of Trump’s increasingly extreme rhetoric, potentially influencing voter perceptions and underestimating the risk of his actions. The lack of strong pushback allows the erosion of checks and balances on his power, further normalizing his behavior.
Read More
Jeff Bezos’ actions, including a $1 million donation to Trump’s inauguration and a recent Mar-a-Lago dinner with Trump and Elon Musk, suggest an attempt to curry favor with the former president. This apparent appeasement is further evidenced by the Washington Post’s suppression of a Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoon critical of billionaires’ deference to Trump and the subsequent cancellation of a Kamala Harris endorsement, costing the Post subscribers. Simultaneously, Amazon Studios is producing a Melania Trump documentary, raising concerns about potential bias and undue influence within Bezos’ media empire. These actions, along with the resignation of the cartoonist in protest, highlight anxieties regarding the influence of billionaire media owners on journalistic integrity.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker