Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene criticized the Trump administration’s capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, viewing it as a continuation of policies that do not prioritize American interests. Greene argued that the operation contradicted the “America First” agenda, emphasizing the need to focus on domestic issues like jobs, housing, and healthcare within the United States. She believes that Venezuela is not part of America’s immediate concerns, and that the U.S. government should focus on domestic affairs. Greene, who has since resigned from Congress, has previously voiced disagreements with Trump on international relations and other policies, highlighting her concerns about the direction of the “America First” platform.
Read More
Following military operations in Venezuela, Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump supporter, issued a stern warning to the former president, claiming such actions contradict the “America First” agenda. Greene criticized the use of American tax dollars for foreign interventions, citing concerns over the rising cost of living and the failure to address issues like the Mexican cartels’ role in the fentanyl crisis. She questioned the motivations behind the operations, particularly in light of Trump’s pardon of a former Honduran President convicted of drug trafficking. Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer also noted concerns from some Republicans regarding Trump’s actions.
Read More
In a recent interview, Marjorie Taylor Greene expressed discomfort with the trend of cosmetic surgery among conservative women, particularly those associated with Donald Trump’s inner circle. She criticized the “sexualization” she perceived in the appearances of these women, specifically mentioning “puffed up” lips and breast augmentations. Greene, who has publicly feuded with Trump, stated that she has found it to be uncomfortable given she has daughters. The described aesthetic has become a symbol linked to Trump’s presidency.
Read More
In a recent interview, outgoing Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene reflected on her evolving views, admitting naivete in her past support of Donald Trump. She cited a pivotal moment during the memorial service of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk, where Trump’s contrasting statement regarding his opponents spurred her disillusionment. Greene’s departure from MAGA aligned with her newfound commitment to her faith. This shift led to her distancing herself from Trump and Republican positions, including her stance on the Gaza conflict, and a vote concerning Jeffrey Epstein’s files, resulting in her current political ostracization.
Read More
‘I Was Just So Naïve’: Inside Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Break With Trump seems to be the latest political theater playing out. The narrative, as it’s being presented, suggests a shift, a distancing from the former president. But is it genuine? The phrase “I was just so naive” feels like a carefully crafted soundbite, a way to explain away years of unwavering support for someone who, as many see it, represents the very antithesis of sensible governance. It’s a classic move, the sort of thing we see when someone wants to distance themselves from a sinking ship, or perhaps, reposition themselves for a different role in the political landscape.… Continue reading
Greene says she didn’t like ‘MAGA Mar-a-Lago sexualization,’ and the immediate reaction seems to be a collective eyebrow raise, if not outright skepticism. It’s difficult to reconcile this statement with the public persona she’s cultivated over the years, a persona deeply intertwined with the very movement and the man at the heart of the Mar-a-Lago scene. The comments highlight the inherent hypocrisy, given her past actions and rhetoric.
Greene’s history includes a very public embrace of Donald Trump, a man whose behavior has been widely criticized and documented. The criticisms span everything from allegations of sexual misconduct to his documented history of making comments about women.… Continue reading
Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene has distanced herself from Trump, citing concerns over his focus on releasing redacted Epstein files instead of addressing economic issues. This shift led her to collaborate with Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie to compel the administration to release the files through the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Greene expressed frustration with the prioritization of these files over critical matters like economic stability, cost of living, and healthcare. This disagreement highlights a growing rift within the GOP, which is expected to continue evolving.
Read More
A recent New York Times profile reveals further details about the strained relationship between Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and former President Donald Trump. Greene claims that her push for transparency regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case ultimately fractured their alliance, citing her advocacy for Epstein’s victims as the catalyst. A White House spokesperson responded to Greene’s comments, dismissing them as “petty bitterness.” Despite the friction, the Epstein Files Transparency Act, championed by Greene, was passed.
Read More
As her final act in Congress, Marjorie Taylor Greene spearheaded a bill that would criminalize gender-affirming care for transgender minors, exposing a pattern of hostility towards the trans community. Despite a recent media tour aimed at rebranding herself as a promoter of civility, Greene’s legislative actions contradict this narrative, highlighting her long-standing history of using anti-trans rhetoric and policies. This bill is consistent with Greene’s past behavior, which has included misgendering trans individuals, promoting misinformation about their healthcare, and targeting them for political gain. Consequently, Greene’s legacy will be defined not by kindness or reconciliation, but by a record of deliberate harm and hate.
Read More
Three Democrats recently voted in favor of Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene’s bill to ban gender-affirming care for transgender youth, which the author argues is an egregious act that warrants their removal from the party. The author highlights the bill’s extreme nature, which criminalizes essential healthcare for trans youth while exempting cisgender youth, and emphasizes that the bill is based on pseudoscientific beliefs. The author contends that the Democratic Party should stand firmly against such attacks on vulnerable minorities and the party’s fundamental values, especially those who align with anti-science views, lack respect for expert opinion, and actively promote harmful conspiracy theories.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood