The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals denied an emergency request to prevent the release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report on President-elect Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election. However, a temporary injunction remains in place for three days, and further legal challenges are anticipated. While the election interference portion of the report is targeted for release, the section concerning classified documents at Mar-a-Lago will remain sealed due to ongoing prosecutions of co-defendants. Trump’s spokesperson condemned the report as politically motivated, while the Justice Department has followed precedent by making such reports public in the past.
Read More
Donald Trump’s return to power on January 20th necessitates continued robust reporting. HuffPost is committed to providing free access to crucial news coverage of this administration. Reader support is essential to maintain this vital public service. Creating a free account helps even those without financial contributions to support this mission.
Read More
The Justice Department intends to release special counsel Jack Smith’s report on Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election, but will withhold the section concerning classified documents at Mar-a-Lago while charges against Trump co-defendants remain pending. This decision follows a judge’s temporary block on the report’s release. The department argues the release of the election interference portion is justified and will be shared with congressional leaders, while the classified documents section will remain confidential to protect the co-defendants’ interests. The Justice Department is appealing the judge’s order, seeking to release the election interference findings completely.
Read More
A federal judge temporarily halted the release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report on investigations into Donald Trump, pending an appeals court decision. This action, prompted by an emergency request from Trump’s defense team citing potential prejudice, follows a pattern of rulings favorable to Trump by the Trump-appointed judge. The report details charging decisions in two cases—the Mar-a-Lago documents case and the 2020 election interference case—both of which were impacted by legal challenges and the Justice Department’s policy against prosecuting sitting presidents. The Justice Department’s next steps remain unclear following the judge’s order.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker