In a recent announcement, President Trump declared his intention to spearhead an initiative to ban mail-in ballots and voting machines for the upcoming midterm elections, sparking immediate criticism. Trump falsely claimed that no other country utilizes mail-in voting and repeated the debunked assertion that the 2020 election was lost due to mail-in ballot fraud. He stated he would sign an executive order that forbids mail-in ballots and automatic tabulation machines. However, legal experts such as Marc Elias argue such an executive order would be unconstitutional, representing a significant threat to free and fair elections.
Read More
Trump’s declaration that he intends to sign an executive order targeting mail-in ballots and voting machines ahead of the 2026 elections has, unsurprisingly, sparked a wave of reactions. It’s almost like clockwork at this point, isn’t it? First, the announcement, then the flurry of commentary, and finally, the realization that we’ve potentially entered another phase of this never-ending political drama.
The core of the matter is this: the former president is vowing to use an executive order to reshape how elections are conducted, specifically by aiming to eliminate mail-in ballots and overhaul the voting machine infrastructure. The reasoning presented is familiar: the specter of widespread voter fraud, an accusation that has been repeatedly debunked by various investigations and court rulings.… Continue reading
Trump Says Putin Agrees With Him That US Should Not Have Mail-in Voting: ‘Vladimir Putin, smart guy, said you can’t have an honest election with mail-in voting’
Okay, so here’s the thing that’s got everyone buzzing. Trump, during a recent interview, flat out stated that Vladimir Putin agrees with him on the issue of mail-in voting. The quote, “Vladimir Putin, smart guy, said you can’t have an honest election with mail-in voting,” really sets the stage, doesn’t it? It’s like, wow, taking advice about elections from a leader of a country known for, shall we say, *robust* control over its own elections.… Continue reading
The Supreme Court’s consideration of a GOP challenge to mail-in voting represents a significant threat to the accessibility and integrity of the electoral process. This challenge isn’t about a wholesale ban on mail-in voting, a system successfully used for years in several states, including Utah, a traditionally Republican stronghold. Instead, the focus is narrower, targeting the validity of ballots postmarked by the election deadline but arriving later.
The timing of this challenge is highly suspect, surfacing prominently after a presidential election loss. This raises questions about the sincerity of the GOP’s concerns. It appears to be a strategic maneuver aimed at suppressing votes, disproportionately affecting those who rely on mail-in ballots due to logistical barriers or circumstances beyond their control.… Continue reading
US Postal Service chief Louis DeJoy’s resignation has sparked a wave of mixed reactions, ranging from outright celebration to deep-seated apprehension. Many see his departure as long overdue, citing years of perceived mismanagement and deliberate efforts to undermine the Postal Service’s efficiency and reliability. The sentiment is strong that his tenure has been marked by a consistent pattern of actions detrimental to the organization, leaving a legacy of damage and distrust.
The timing of his resignation, however, is fueling suspicion. Some believe it’s suspiciously convenient, suggesting a strategic maneuver to pave the way for the privatization of postal services, potentially benefiting DeJoy’s own business interests.… Continue reading
The news that a USPS mailbox was lit on fire in Phoenix, damaging several ballots, rattled me more than I initially expected. I couldn’t fathom how a single act of arson could affect the voting process, especially during such a crucial time. It’s astonishing to think that someone would willingly engage in a destructive act like this, facing the possibility of three years in prison and a hefty fine. One has to wonder about the mind of someone who would choose to disrupt the democratic process simply to get themselves arrested, as the suspect Dieter Klofkorn claimed.
The fact that Klofkorn stated there was no political motivation behind his actions made me pause.… Continue reading
Donald Trump, the man who never fails to surprise us with his audacity, is once again making headlines for threatening a lawsuit against an ad that uses his own words to discourage mail voting. The irony and hypocrisy in this situation are so thick that you could cut it with a knife. It’s almost comical to see Trump squirm when faced with the consequences of his own actions.
For someone who has repeatedly claimed that the justice system is rigged against him, he sure does love to run to court at every opportunity. The fact that he wants to sue for an ad simply using his own words is a testament to his inability to take responsibility for his actions.… Continue reading
It’s truly astounding to witness the lengths to which the Trump-infused Republican National Committee is willing to go in order to suppress the vote and sabotage the democratic process. Instead of focusing on policies and platforms that would actually attract voters, they are doubling down on legal challenges and stratagems to undermine the integrity of our elections. It’s a sad state of affairs when a political party prioritizes power grabs over fair and free elections.
The decision to dismantle the GOP’s mail-in voter effort is not just short-sighted, it’s a blatant disregard for the rights of voters, especially those who rely on mail-in ballots for accessibility or safety reasons.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood