The Supreme Court has revived a lawsuit brought by Illinois Republican Congressman Mike Bost challenging a state law allowing mail-in ballots received after Election Day to be counted. The 7-2 decision, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, determined that candidates have a concrete interest in the rules governing vote counting. Justices debated whether candidates have standing to challenge such laws, despite lower courts dismissing Bost’s suit. This case reflects broader Republican efforts to challenge mail-in voting practices, with sixteen states currently accepting mail-in ballots received after Election Day.
Read More
The United States Postal Service has finalized a rule defining postmarks and clarifying their significance in relation to mail acceptance dates. The rule emphasizes that the postmark date often reflects the initial automated processing, not necessarily the date of USPS possession, and potential delays are likely due to operational changes. To guarantee a same-day postmark, customers must utilize specific retail services like manual postmarks, postage validation imprints, or certified mailing. This clarification is particularly important for tax filings, as the postmark date is crucial in determining timely submission under IRS regulations.
Read More
Trump called for Republicans to end the government shutdown and prioritize legislation focused on election security. His proposed measures included mandatory voter ID and the elimination of mail-in voting, arguing they would prevent cheating. This stance is contradicted by the fact that many Democratic victories came from states with existing voter ID laws, and that he himself has voted by mail in the past. Furthermore, Trump’s comparison of voting to purchasing goods at stores highlights a disconnect from reality.
Read More
Following a series of Democratic victories in statewide elections, former President Donald Trump called for sweeping changes to the election system on Truth Social. His demands included strict voter ID laws, the end of mail-in voting, and opposition to expanding the Supreme Court and granting statehood to Washington D.C. or Puerto Rico. The Democrats saw wins in Virginia, New Jersey, and New York City, as well as ballot initiatives in other states. These victories led to a renewed Republican concern over electoral prospects, with some Republicans blaming flawed campaigns and strategic missteps.
Read More
On Monday, former President Trump issued a Truth Social post filled with false claims about mail-in voting and announced plans for an illegal executive order to end it. This move, explicitly linked to the midterm elections, reveals an intent to utilize presidential power to manipulate the outcomes. This announcement follows a scheme to gerrymander in Texas. Election subversion analyst David Daley discusses Trump’s strategies for helping the GOP and analyzes the potential for success while outlining necessary Democratic responses.
Read More
In a recent announcement, President Trump declared his intention to spearhead an initiative to ban mail-in ballots and voting machines for the upcoming midterm elections, sparking immediate criticism. Trump falsely claimed that no other country utilizes mail-in voting and repeated the debunked assertion that the 2020 election was lost due to mail-in ballot fraud. He stated he would sign an executive order that forbids mail-in ballots and automatic tabulation machines. However, legal experts such as Marc Elias argue such an executive order would be unconstitutional, representing a significant threat to free and fair elections.
Read More
Trump’s declaration that he intends to sign an executive order targeting mail-in ballots and voting machines ahead of the 2026 elections has, unsurprisingly, sparked a wave of reactions. It’s almost like clockwork at this point, isn’t it? First, the announcement, then the flurry of commentary, and finally, the realization that we’ve potentially entered another phase of this never-ending political drama.
The core of the matter is this: the former president is vowing to use an executive order to reshape how elections are conducted, specifically by aiming to eliminate mail-in ballots and overhaul the voting machine infrastructure. The reasoning presented is familiar: the specter of widespread voter fraud, an accusation that has been repeatedly debunked by various investigations and court rulings.… Continue reading
Trump Says Putin Agrees With Him That US Should Not Have Mail-in Voting: ‘Vladimir Putin, smart guy, said you can’t have an honest election with mail-in voting’
Okay, so here’s the thing that’s got everyone buzzing. Trump, during a recent interview, flat out stated that Vladimir Putin agrees with him on the issue of mail-in voting. The quote, “Vladimir Putin, smart guy, said you can’t have an honest election with mail-in voting,” really sets the stage, doesn’t it? It’s like, wow, taking advice about elections from a leader of a country known for, shall we say, *robust* control over its own elections.… Continue reading
The Supreme Court’s consideration of a GOP challenge to mail-in voting represents a significant threat to the accessibility and integrity of the electoral process. This challenge isn’t about a wholesale ban on mail-in voting, a system successfully used for years in several states, including Utah, a traditionally Republican stronghold. Instead, the focus is narrower, targeting the validity of ballots postmarked by the election deadline but arriving later.
The timing of this challenge is highly suspect, surfacing prominently after a presidential election loss. This raises questions about the sincerity of the GOP’s concerns. It appears to be a strategic maneuver aimed at suppressing votes, disproportionately affecting those who rely on mail-in ballots due to logistical barriers or circumstances beyond their control.… Continue reading
US Postal Service chief Louis DeJoy’s resignation has sparked a wave of mixed reactions, ranging from outright celebration to deep-seated apprehension. Many see his departure as long overdue, citing years of perceived mismanagement and deliberate efforts to undermine the Postal Service’s efficiency and reliability. The sentiment is strong that his tenure has been marked by a consistent pattern of actions detrimental to the organization, leaving a legacy of damage and distrust.
The timing of his resignation, however, is fueling suspicion. Some believe it’s suspiciously convenient, suggesting a strategic maneuver to pave the way for the privatization of postal services, potentially benefiting DeJoy’s own business interests.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood