Senator Murkowski had co-sponsored an amendment to extend tax credits for solar and wind energy projects in Alaska’s Railbelt, aiming to mitigate an impending energy crisis. This amendment was intended to provide a 12-month window for clean energy projects. However, a subsequent executive order from Trump aimed to eliminate these tax credits, thus disrupting the agreement. Murkowski has since expressed feeling misled by the administration regarding the executive order.
Read More
Senator Lisa Murkowski, despite expressing concerns about the devastating impact of President Trump’s tax bill, ultimately voted in favor of it. She secured several provisions specifically benefiting Alaska, such as delaying cuts to food assistance and securing funds for rural hospitals. However, the bill is expected to negatively impact many Alaskans by potentially leading to a loss of health insurance and food assistance. Murkowski’s actions sparked debate, with critics questioning her decision to prioritize Alaska’s interests even as the bill harms vulnerable populations.
Read More
Senator Lisa Murkowski, despite claiming to be a moderate and “pro-choice”, cast the deciding vote on a Republican-led bill that would significantly impact healthcare access and reproductive rights. This vote, which could shutter numerous Planned Parenthood clinics, came despite her expressing personal reservations about the bill’s impact on vulnerable populations. Critics point out that Murkowski could have forced changes but chose to prioritize her constituents’ interests, even at the expense of others. This move further demonstrated Murkowski’s inconsistency and her willingness to support policies that contradict her stated values, ultimately affecting access to essential healthcare services.
Read More
In a close 51-50 vote, Donald Trump’s controversial bill narrowly passed the Senate, largely due to the support of Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski. Republicans included provisions benefiting Alaska to secure her vote, but a last-minute change impacted the Medicaid funding that Murkowski was hoping to gain. Despite her reservations about the bill’s readiness, she voted in favor, citing concerns about potential negative impacts on her state. As a result of her vote, Murkowski secured a tax break for Alaskan fishing villages and whaling captains along with an exemption that would apply to 10 states with the highest payment error rates, including Alaska.
Read More
In a significant development, Senator Lisa Murkowski, a Republican from Alaska, voted in favor of the sweeping tax and spending package but has urged the House to revisit the bill. Her crucial vote allowed the bill to narrowly pass the Senate. Despite her support, Murkowski expressed concerns, particularly regarding the bill’s impact on Alaska’s vulnerable populations and indicated a need for further revisions. The bill now faces uncertainty as it moves to the House, where Republicans are divided on key aspects. The legislation includes extensions of Trump-era tax cuts, a debt ceiling hike, and significant changes to Medicaid, SNAP, and clean energy funding.
Read More
Murkowski votes to advance GOP megabill after early misgivings over Medicaid, SNAP cuts, and it seems, the inevitable disappointment is here. It’s like watching a movie where you already know the ending. Despite expressing initial concerns about the bill, particularly regarding potential cuts to Medicaid and SNAP programs, Senator Murkowski cast her vote to move it forward. The recurring theme here, it seems, is that her “misgivings” often don’t translate into a vote that aligns with those concerns.
The bill itself, as many have noted, carries a significant price tag, potentially adding billions to the national debt. Some suggest this very fact is appealing to Republicans.… Continue reading
Three months into President Trump’s second term, Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) openly acknowledged widespread fear among lawmakers, citing real instances of retaliation against dissenters. She highlighted her own anxieties about speaking out, despite facing considerable pressure and threats, including from Trump himself, who actively campaigned against her reelection. Murkowski urged continued resistance against the administration’s actions, emphasizing the importance of sustained engagement despite potential consequences. She stressed the need for Congress to proactively address the situation, rather than deferring responsibility.
Read More
Senator Lisa Murkowski criticizes the Trump administration’s unilateral dismantling of government programs, budget freezes, and widespread federal worker layoffs, arguing Congress is failing in its constitutional duty to check executive power. This action is causing widespread anxiety, particularly in states heavily reliant on federal funding like Alaska. Murkowski highlights the administration’s dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development and the concerning politicization of the judiciary. She notes that fear of retaliation prevents many Republican colleagues from publicly criticizing the president.
Read More
Senator Lisa Murkowski, a vocal critic of DOGE and the Trump administration, defied Elon Musk’s potential retribution, stating that he may fund a challenger in her 2028 reelection campaign. Murkowski attributed the silence of her GOP colleagues to fear of primary challenges fueled by Musk’s and Trump’s influence. Her repeated criticisms of DOGE’s cost-cutting measures and resulting firings, particularly impacting Alaska, highlight her unwavering stance despite potential political consequences. Murkowski’s 2022 primary victory offers some insulation, but the threat of well-funded primary challenges looms large for other GOP senators.
Read More
Senator Murkowski’s statement regarding the Trump administration’s approach to Ukraine highlights a growing concern within the Republican party. Her assertion that the administration “appears to be walking away from our allies” represents a rare instance of public dissent from within the GOP, a party generally known for its strong support of the president. The careful wording, however, suggests a degree of political caution, perhaps reflecting the delicate balance Murkowski needs to maintain within her own party.
The phrasing itself, “appears to be,” hints at a reluctance to make a fully definitive accusation. This could be a strategic choice to avoid alienating staunch Trump supporters within her constituency while still expressing her unease.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood