The Supreme Court has allowed Lisa Cook to remain as a Federal Reserve governor for now, declining to act on the Trump administration’s effort to immediately remove her from the central bank. The court will hear arguments in January regarding Trump’s attempt to force Cook off the Fed board and will consider whether to block a lower-court ruling in Cook’s favor. This case stems from Trump’s unprecedented bid to reshape the Fed board and stems from accusations of mortgage fraud against Cook, while a related case involving Trump’s firings of other federal officials is also being heard. Cook, who denies any wrongdoing, will be able to participate in the remaining two Fed meetings in 2025.
Read More
The Trump administration has petitioned the Supreme Court for an emergency order to remove Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve’s board of governors. This action follows a failed attempt by the administration to oust Cook, who was appointed by President Joe Biden, and is part of a larger effort to reshape the Fed. The legal challenge is unprecedented, as no president has previously fired a sitting Fed governor. The administration argues that Cook’s alleged actions regarding mortgage rates raise concerns about her trustworthiness and ability to manage interest rates, though she denies any wrongdoing and has not been charged with a crime.
Read More
US appeals court rejects Trump bid to oust Fed’s Lisa Cook, and it feels like a very important moment in a longer story. The core of this is that a federal court has just said “no” to Trump’s attempt to remove Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve board. It’s not just a formality either; the court ruled the removal was illegal and has put her back in her position. It really underscores the legal challenges Trump faces, and frankly, the kind of things he seems to want to be able to do without any real basis.
This whole situation started with accusations aimed at Cook.… Continue reading
Newly discovered documents challenge the Trump administration’s accusations that Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook committed mortgage fraud. The dispute centers on whether a federal housing regulator’s referral to the Department of Justice was supported by documents demonstrating criminal intent, and if Trump could lawfully remove a Fed governor. A loan estimate for Cook’s Atlanta property, obtained by Reuters, indicates she intended to use it as a vacation home, contradicting claims that she falsely declared multiple properties as primary residences. Cook has sued to prevent her removal, with a federal judge issuing a preliminary injunction allowing her to remain on the Fed while the suit proceeds.
Read More
Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook characterized a condominium as a “vacation home” on a loan estimate, which could contradict claims of mortgage fraud. The Trump administration, seeking Cook’s removal, alleged she falsely claimed both the condo and another property as her primary residence simultaneously. Cook sued to block her firing and secured an injunction, although the administration has appealed the ruling. The Justice Department is investigating these claims, as misrepresenting a property’s primary residence status can impact mortgage terms.
Read More
Financial documents obtained by NBC News contradict accusations of mortgage fraud against Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. Records from a loan summary and Cook’s national security questionnaire indicate the Atlanta property was designated as a “vacation home” and a “2nd home,” respectively. This contradicts claims by figures like Bill Pulte and Donald Trump, who have accused Cook of misrepresenting the property as her primary residence for financial gain. Despite these documents, the Trump administration is still attempting to remove Cook from her role, and a federal judge has temporarily blocked her termination.
Read More
In a recent ruling, a judge has blocked a former president from removing Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. The judge’s preliminary injunction cited that the removal attempt violated the Federal Reserve Act’s “for cause” provision, which limits grounds for removal to actions related to the Governor’s behavior in office. This decision allows Cook to participate in upcoming Fed meetings. The former president’s effort to remove Cook followed months of pressuring the Fed to lower interest rates, and stemmed from allegations of mortgage fraud that occurred before Cook joined the Fed.
Read More
Justice Department opens criminal investigation into Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook: Sources. It appears the news of a Justice Department investigation into Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook has ignited a firestorm of commentary, and I’m here to sort through the reactions. The central point, the spark that ignited this discussion, is the launching of a criminal probe into Cook. The subsequent debate immediately centers around the application of consistent standards of accountability and raises questions about fairness and potential political motivations.
Justice Department opens criminal investigation into Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook: Sources. A core concern is the argument that if someone commits fraud, they should face consequences, regardless of their position.… Continue reading
The article alleges that Donald Trump’s actions, including his attempt to remove Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve board and his cabinet appointments, reflect a pattern of targeting diverse voices. Critics argue that these actions, along with his history of racially charged statements and policies, are indicative of a man who is bringing white nationalist views into the mainstream. The firing of Cook, the first Black woman on the board, is seen as part of a broader effort to undermine independent institutions and implement policies aligned with his political agenda. While Trump denies accusations of racism, his critics suggest his actions, including the removal of other prominent Black leaders, speak louder than words.
Read More
Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook is suing former President Donald Trump over his attempt to remove her from her position, sparking a legal challenge regarding the Fed’s autonomy. Trump cited “sufficient reason” to believe Cook made false statements regarding her mortgage, which he says allows him to remove her. Cook’s lawsuit seeks to invalidate Trump’s firing order and names Fed Chairman Jerome Powell as a defendant. This legal battle highlights the contentious relationship between Trump and the Fed, particularly concerning interest rate policy.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood