In a recent Truth Social post, former President Donald Trump launched a scathing attack on New York Attorney General Letitia James, labeling her as “scum” and demanding her removal. Trump’s tirade claimed James’ actions are driving businesses from New York and harming the state’s economy, particularly mentioning the impact on the New York Stock Exchange. The post follows James’ successful prosecution of the Trump Organization, which resulted in a substantial financial judgment against the company. This is not the first time Trump has targeted James, as he has previously sought to use his position to have her investigated.
Read More
U.S. Attorney Erik Siebert resigned after facing pressure from the Trump administration for his monthslong mortgage fraud investigation into New York Attorney General Letitia James, which has yet to result in criminal charges. This departure follows President Trump’s expressed desire to see Siebert removed, raising concerns about White House influence on the Justice Department. The investigation, launched by the administration, has been criticized by James’ lawyers as an act of political revenge, further eroding norms meant to shield the Justice Department from political interference. Siebert was nominated by Trump this year and had been investigating James over alleged paperwork discrepancies regarding her properties.
Read More
A federal appeals court sided against Donald Trump’s tariff program, declaring the method of implementation unlawful. This ruling, upholding a prior decision, determined Trump violated the law by using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act without congressional approval. New York Attorney General Letitia James celebrated the court’s decision as a win for American families and businesses, as the tariffs were viewed as massive taxes. Trump’s administration is expected to appeal the case, which is set to take effect in October.
Read More
Eagle Ed Martin, a Trump-aligned activist, stirred controversy by investigating New York Attorney General Letitia James and then showing up at her home, violating Justice Department protocols and norms. Further scrutiny is brought to light as Trump seemingly plans to interfere with election processes through executive order. Claims are made that states are merely agents of the federal government, and can be told how to run elections by the President. These actions raise concerns about the integrity of the Justice Department and potential meddling in state elections.
Read More
New York Attorney General Letitia James is conducting an inquiry into potential insider trading within President Trump’s inner circle, focusing on market reactions to recent tariff policies. This inquiry, utilizing the powerful Martin Act, is unprecedented in scope, investigating whether individuals profited illegally from non-public information regarding government decisions. While proving insider trading is notoriously difficult, the inquiry involves examining trading data for suspicious patterns and potentially issuing inquiry letters. However, significant legal challenges are anticipated, including potential conflicts with executive privilege and the inherent difficulty of distinguishing legitimate trading activity from illegal insider activity in volatile markets.
Read More
New York Attorney General Letitia James announced an imminent lawsuit against the Trump administration for its temporary freeze on federal grants, a move she deems unconstitutional and dangerous to numerous communities. The White House, while asserting that crucial programs like Social Security and Medicare remain unaffected, justified the freeze as eliminating funding for initiatives deemed “woke.” This action has drawn sharp criticism from Democrats, who highlight the potential devastating impact on vulnerable populations, while conservatives defend the move as targeting specific programs. The lawsuit, joined by other Democratic attorneys general, challenges the legality and impact of the freeze.
Read More
Despite Donald Trump’s impending return to the presidency, the $454 million civil fraud judgment against him and his sons will remain in effect. New York Attorney General Letitia James’ office firmly rejected a request to drop the case, emphasizing that presidential immunity does not extend to civil litigation. The judgment, stemming from allegations of fraudulent financial statements, totals $490 million with interest. James intends to continue defending the judgment as Trump’s appeal proceeds.
Read More
Mike Davis, a fierce ally of President-elect Donald Trump, has issued a stark warning to New York Attorney General Letitia James. Davis, who has been considered for a high-ranking position in the Trump administration, believes James’ continued legal pursuit of Trump constitutes a “conspiracy against rights” and could violate federal law. He has threatened legal action against James if she continues her legal challenges, arguing that the Trump administration will have no tolerance for such “lawfare.” Davis warns that James should consider the potential consequences of her actions, including potential criminal charges, and that her “lawfare” against Trump will not be tolerated in his second term.
Read More
Letitia James nears green light to start taking Donald Trump’s assets. The anticipation builds, the hope surges, and yet, time and time again, we find ourselves in a never-ending cycle of waiting for justice to be served. It’s like watching a scene from a movie where the hero is running towards the final showdown, and yet, the climax remains just out of reach.
The legal dance continues, with attorneys speculating on the potential outcomes, the possible appeals, and the constant delays that seem to prolong the inevitable. The bond, the paperwork, the deadlines – all contributing factors to a process that feels mired in bureaucracy and legal maneuvering.… Continue reading
Letitia James Is Prepared to Seize One of Trump’s Favorite Assets
The news of Letitia James, the New York attorney general, making moves to seize one of Donald Trump’s beloved assets has sparked a flurry of reactions. From eager anticipation to sheer disbelief, the prospect of seeing Trump’s properties being seized is a spectacle that many are eagerly awaiting. The thought of him losing control over something he holds dear is indeed a poetic form of justice.
The idea of seizing Trump’s assets, including properties in Westchester and possibly his golf courses, has a certain poetic justice to it. Trump, a man who has made a career out of questionable business practices and financial dealings, could finally be facing the consequences of his actions.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker