Trump’s “big, beautiful bill,” as it’s been dubbed, is facing significant headwinds in the Senate, despite initial predictions of its smooth passage. The bill, far from being the boon its name suggests, is generating considerable opposition, raising serious questions about its ultimate fate.
The bill’s passage isn’t guaranteed, despite the Republicans’ current Senate majority. While many expect it to ultimately pass, the level of dissent and the strategic maneuvering suggest a far less certain outcome than initially projected. There’s a significant undercurrent of discontent brewing, hinting at a potential collapse of support.
Several Senators have openly expressed reservations, although characterizing their discontent as outright opposition might be premature.… Continue reading
Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) recently admitted to voting for the “big, beautiful bill” without reading it, specifically citing a provision on pages 278-279 that prevents states from regulating AI for ten years. She now opposes this section, calling it a violation of state rights, and demands its removal. Greene’s admission sparked widespread online criticism for her failure to thoroughly review the legislation before voting. This incident follows a similar admission by Representative Mike Flood (R-NE), who also voted for a bill without full comprehension of its contents.
Read More
Marjorie Taylor Greene’s recent admission that she didn’t read the massive spending bill she voted for highlights a concerning lack of diligence in the legislative process. Her statement, “I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there,” speaks volumes about her approach to her duties as a representative. It raises serious questions not only about her competence but also about the entire process of lawmaking when such significant legislation is passed without thorough review by those voting on it.
The sheer scale of the bill, often referred to as a “mega bill,” undoubtedly contributes to the problem.… Continue reading
The filibuster has long been a contentious issue in American politics, with its roots stemming from a bygone era where drawn-out debates were meant to serve as a check on hasty decision-making. However, in modern times, the filibuster has become a tool used to obstruct progress and stymie important legislation from being passed. The idea of eliminating the filibuster altogether, as proposed by Kamala Harris, is a bold move that could potentially reshape the political landscape and pave the way for significant reforms.
One of the main arguments against the filibuster is that it is undemocratic and often used for undemocratic purposes, such as blocking civil rights legislation.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker