Legal Settlement

Judge Delays Purdue Pharma Sentencing Amid Victim Participation Demands

A judge delayed Purdue Pharma’s criminal sentencing to allow victims of the opioid crisis to attend in person, moved by protests outside the courthouse. The sentencing is expected to finalize a $225 million forfeiture by the OxyContin maker, clearing the path for a broader settlement of thousands of lawsuits. This comprehensive agreement includes up to $7 billion from the Sackler family and resolves federal investigations, although some victims continue to advocate for further prosecution.

Read More

Trump Administration Agrees to Keep Pride Flag Flying at Stonewall Monument

The Trump administration has agreed to settle a lawsuit by reinstating the Pride flag at the Stonewall National Monument in New York City. This decision reverses a previous removal and confirms the intent to keep the flag flying, except for maintenance. The agreement stipulates the Pride flag will be flown below the U.S. flag and above the park service flag, adhering to flag code. The removal had sparked protests and legal action from LGBTQ+ and historic preservation groups, who viewed it as an affront to the site’s significance in the fight for LGBTQ+ rights.

Read More

Father of Indian student killed by cop dies before $29 million settlement

The family of Jaahnavi Kandula, a 23-year-old Indian student tragically killed in a Seattle police crash in January 2023, has faced further heartbreak with the passing of her father, Kandula Srikanth. Mr. Srikanth, a retired police constable, died of a heart attack on February 10, just two days before a $29 million compensation settlement for his daughter’s death was announced. The family is currently in mourning and has declined to comment on the settlement at this time.

Read More

Judge Blocks Alex Jones Bankruptcy Settlement, Sparking Outrage Over Sandy Hook Families

A bankruptcy judge recently blocked a proposed settlement in Alex Jones’ bankruptcy case, a decision that has sparked outrage and confusion amongst many. The settlement, intended to compensate the families of Sandy Hook victims for Jones’s defamatory statements, was deemed insufficient by the judge. This wasn’t a simple case of a judge arbitrarily rejecting a deal; rather, it appears the judge believed the current plan shortchanged the families.

The core issue revolves around the perceived inadequacy of the settlement offer in relation to the immense harm inflicted upon the Sandy Hook families. The judge’s intervention suggests a belief that the families deserve a significantly larger financial recompense, reflecting the gravity of the emotional and psychological damage caused by Jones’s actions.… Continue reading