Michael Sullivan, wrongly convicted of the 1986 murder of Wilfred McGrath, was awarded $13 million in damages after a jury determined his innocence. However, a state law limits such payouts to $1 million, the amount Sullivan will ultimately receive. Sullivan’s conviction stemmed from false testimony and fabricated evidence, including a state police chemist’s false report of incriminating physical evidence. Despite the reduced compensation, Sullivan’s exoneration after 26 years in prison is his primary focus.
Read More
Marital rape is a term that should not even exist in our vocabulary today, yet here we are in India, where this heinous act is still not outlawed. The fact that the government argues that changing this would be ‘excessively harsh’ is not just disappointing but also downright disturbing. How can we, as a society, turn a blind eye to the suffering of countless women who are victimized within the confines of their own marriages?
It is appalling to think that in a country where arranged marriages are still prevalent, women may have no say in who they marry and are then subjected to sexual violence without any legal recourse.… Continue reading
As I sit here contemplating the latest developments regarding Alec Baldwin’s film set shooting case, I am left dumbfounded by the sheer audacity of the prosecutor who continues to push for the reinstatement of charges. Wasn’t it dismissed with prejudice? Isn’t that supposed to be the end of it? It seems as though this prosecutor is on a personal vendetta against Baldwin, determined to salvage her career at the expense of justice itself.
The amount of taxpayer dollars being wasted on this futile pursuit is staggering. Over $750,000 has already been spent on prosecuting Baldwin and the armorer, Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, with the costs continuing to climb.… Continue reading
As I read about the story of an ex-teacher receiving a five-year prison sentence for threatening a Florida judge in an LGBTQ case, I can’t help but feel a mix of shock and understanding. On one hand, threatening a judge – no matter the circumstances – is never acceptable. The rule of law must be upheld, and any form of intimidation towards those in positions of power undermines the very fabric of our society. However, delving deeper into the context of the case raises important questions about the fairness and consistency of our judicial system.
The fact that the teacher, Thorn, made threatening phone calls to the judge, expressing anger and frustration over a ruling related to LGBTQ issues, is undeniably troubling.… Continue reading
As I delve into the news of Elon Musk’s X proceeding to trial in a case against Media Matters after a dismissal request denial by a Texas judge, my mind races with thoughts on the complexity and implications of this legal battle. It is disheartening to see the pervasiveness of judge shopping and the potential for manipulation within our justice system. The choice of the judge overseeing a case can drastically impact its outcome, leading to questions of fairness and impartiality.
Elon Musk’s lawsuit against Media Matters, stemming from their report on hateful content alongside online ads on the X platform, raises eyebrows at the notion of holding a watchdog organization accountable for reporting factual information.… Continue reading
I can’t even begin to wrap my head around the horror and tragedy that unfolded in that Manhattan apartment. The thought of a loving son finding his mother’s lifeless body stuffed in a duffel bag is absolutely heart-wrenching and beyond imagination. The pain and trauma that poor man must be going through is unfathomable, and my heart truly goes out to him and his family.
It’s truly shocking to think that squatters were the cause of such a heinous and despicable crime. How can someone have the audacity to not only illegally occupy someone else’s property but also commit such a horrific act within those walls?… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker