A federal judge has ruled that Alina Habba was unlawfully serving as the acting U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey, creating legal uncertainty in the state. The judge, citing a challenge to Habba’s position, determined she lacked the legal authority to hold the office since July 1st, potentially voiding her actions since then and disqualifying her from ongoing cases. This ruling comes after the Trump administration employed unusual measures to retain Habba, following a decision to name Desiree Grace to the position. The court has paused the decision to allow for a U.S. appeal.
Read More
Justin Baldoni’s lawsuit against Blake Lively, a legal battle that captivated and frustrated many, has been dismissed by a federal judge. This dismissal, however, doesn’t mark the end of the story, as several crucial aspects remain unresolved and fuel ongoing debate. The judge’s decision focuses on the specific claims made within Baldoni’s countersuit, not the broader conflict between the two actors. The dismissal itself seems to be based on a finding that the suit lacked merit, describing the underlying case as “total BS,” suggesting fundamental flaws in the legal arguments presented.
The judge’s ruling doesn’t impact Lively’s ongoing lawsuit against Baldoni.… Continue reading
Paul and Christy Akeo, a Michigan couple, were released from a Mexican prison after nearly a month of detainment following a dispute with Palace Resorts over timeshare payments. Mexican prosecutors initially accused the Akeos of fraud related to disputed credit card charges totaling over $116,000, but the charges were dropped after a reparation agreement was reached. This agreement involved the Akeos paying damages, which will be donated to Mexican charities. The Akeos’ family maintained the allegations were false, stemming from Palace Resorts’ failure to provide promised services. The couple’s release followed intervention by US officials, including Congressman Barrett and President Trump.
Read More
A federal judge sharply criticized the Trump administration for its failure to comply with a 12-day-old temporary restraining order that unfroze USAID contract spending. Despite the order, the government continued to defy the court’s directive to restore funding to global aid programs. The judge issued highly specific instructions for compliance, demanding payment of all pre-February 13th invoices by midnight February 26th and the submission of a joint status report detailing compliance steps. Further, the court ordered the government to provide all internal directives regarding compliance with the order by noon on February 26th, setting the stage for potential future legal action.
Read More