Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, temporarily blocked the release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report investigating President-elect Trump, prompting immediate criticism. This action follows Cannon’s earlier dismissal of the classified documents case against Trump. Legal analyst Lisa Rubin argued Cannon lacks jurisdiction to issue such a stay, given her prior ruling. The stay remains in effect until three days after the appeals court rules on the matter, a timeline raising questions about its potential duration beyond Trump’s inauguration. The report’s release is opposed by Trump and his co-defendants.
Read More
Donald Trump’s lawyers reviewed a draft of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report and threaten legal action if it’s released, arguing Smith lacks the authority to do so due to a prior court ruling deeming his appointment unlawful. Co-defendants Nauta and De Oliveira, citing potential prejudice to their ongoing cases, joined the legal challenge, requesting Judge Cannon block the report’s release. The defense claims the draft presents a biased narrative, and insufficient redactions would further harm their ability to receive a fair trial. While the Justice Department plans to share a redacted version with Congress, Trump’s legal team seeks pre-release notification to pursue legal action.
Read More
Connecticut’s attorney general has declared he would be the first to file a lawsuit if Donald Trump were to attempt to abolish birthright citizenship. This bold statement highlights the significant legal and political ramifications of such a move.
The assertion underscores the deep-seated belief that birthright citizenship, enshrined in the Fourteenth Amendment, is a fundamental principle of American law. Challenging this long-standing legal precedent would undoubtedly trigger widespread legal challenges, and the Connecticut AG’s willingness to spearhead such a fight is a strong indication of the seriousness with which this threat is viewed.
It’s a testament to the potential for such an action to spark widespread opposition, particularly among those who view birthright citizenship as a cornerstone of American identity and the promise of equal opportunity.… Continue reading
A federal court’s overturning of the Biden administration’s overtime rule resulted in pay raises being rescinded for 306 Ohio State University employees. The rule, which would have extended overtime pay to millions of salaried workers, was deemed to exceed the Labor Department’s authority due to its high salary threshold and automatic updates. Consequently, Ohio State retracted the recently implemented raises, citing the legal reversal. This situation mirrors a similar event in 2016, highlighting the ongoing debate and legal challenges surrounding overtime regulations.
Read More
Reports indicate that President-elect Trump’s transition team is drafting an executive order to medically discharge approximately 15,000 transgender service members. This action, if implemented, would create significant logistical challenges for the military, potentially disrupting readiness and exacerbating existing recruiting difficulties. The proposed mass discharge contrasts sharply with current policy and could face legal hurdles, mirroring previous attempts to ban transgender service members. Experts warn of the severe consequences of such a drastic and disruptive measure, particularly given the experience level and contributions of transgender service members.
Read More
Donald Trump’s proposed immigration policies, including mass deportations and the potential violation of birthright citizenship, represent a grave threat to the American legal and economic system. These plans, if enacted, would severely impact California’s economy, particularly agriculture and construction, and cause widespread social disruption. California Attorney General Rob Bonta has stated that the state is prepared to take legal action against any unlawful actions taken by the federal government. This preparedness includes preemptive legal strategies and collaboration with other states and advocacy groups to protect residents and challenge federal overreach.
Read More
A recent federal court ruling has dealt a blow to President Biden’s efforts to provide a pathway to citizenship for undocumented spouses of U.S. citizens. The program, which aimed to streamline the process and provide relief for families facing separation due to immigration status, has been deemed illegal by the court. This decision comes amidst a long-standing debate about immigration policy and the role of executive orders in shaping the legal landscape.
The ruling highlights the ongoing struggle for comprehensive immigration reform in the United States. The Biden administration, like its predecessors, has resorted to executive actions to address pressing issues in the absence of congressional consensus.… Continue reading
Trump Is Inching Closer to the Worst Legal Defeat of his Life
As the legal battles continue to mount for former President Donald Trump, it seems that he may be inching closer to what could be the worst legal defeat of his life. The recent request by the New York Attorney General, Letitia James, for a $370 million disgorgement is just the beginning, and there is a possibility that the amount could go even higher.
One of the key issues at hand is Trump’s financial situation. It’s no secret that he doesn’t have a surplus of cash readily available to pay off these legal fines.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood