Late Thursday, President Trump issued an executive order eliminating collective bargaining rights for approximately 700,000 federal union workers across numerous departments, citing national security concerns and claiming union opposition to his agenda. This action, utilizing a loophole in the 1978 Civil Service Reform Act, represents the most significant attack on federal worker unions in US history. Major unions, including the AFGE and AFSCME, have denounced the order as illegal and vowed immediate legal action. The White House justified the move by alleging that certain federal unions have engaged in actions against the administration.
Read More
Bernie Sanders is investigating Trump’s purging of labor officials, a move that highlights the stark contrast between Sanders’ proactive approach and the perceived inaction of other Democratic politicians. This investigation underscores a growing concern about the erosion of worker protections and the potential for systematic undermining of labor rights.
The scale and speed of Trump’s actions raise serious questions about the effectiveness of existing investigative mechanisms. Concerns are expressed that investigations, even if launched, may not be swift enough to counteract the damage already done or to prevent further transgressions. The urgency of the situation is palpable.
Many feel that Sanders is virtually alone among prominent politicians in actively confronting Trump’s actions, leading to frustration and a sense that the Democratic party as a whole is failing to adequately address these critical issues.… Continue reading
Amazon will close all seven of its Quebec facilities within the next two months, resulting in the layoff of nearly 2,000 employees. The company claims this decision, impacting its only unionized Canadian workforce, is a cost-saving measure related to a shift back to a third-party delivery model. However, the timing, coinciding with recent unionization efforts at a Laval warehouse, has sparked controversy and accusations of anti-union tactics. The Quebec government has pledged support for affected workers, while the union strongly condemns the closure.
Read More
Amazon will close seven Quebec sites, impacting nearly 1800 employees, and shifting to a third-party delivery model similar to its pre-2020 system. The company cites a review of operations and claims the decision is unrelated to recent unionization efforts at a Laval warehouse, despite speculation linking the two. Amazon is offering affected workers severance packages including up to 14 weeks of salary and transition support. Intelcom, an existing Amazon subcontractor, is reportedly poised to assume some of the vacated roles.
Read More
A Trump presidency will likely reverse recent pro-labor NLRB decisions, potentially reinstating anti-union practices like mandatory anti-union meetings. The incoming administration is expected to replace pro-worker appointees, including General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo, and overturn rulings that protect worker rights during unionization efforts, such as the Cemex decision and the reinstatement of “quickie elections.” This could significantly curtail workers’ ability to organize and bargain collectively, reversing the gains made during the Biden administration. Legal challenges to the NLRB’s authority further threaten its ability to protect workers’ rights.
Read More
Amazon workers at the company’s first-ever unionized warehouse have authorized a strike. This landmark event signifies a significant challenge to Amazon’s powerful influence and raises crucial questions about labor rights and the power dynamics between corporations and their employees. The authorization itself is a testament to the workers’ determination to fight for better working conditions and fair treatment. The fact that this is taking place at Amazon’s first unionized warehouse highlights the uphill battle faced by unionization efforts in a company known for its aggressive anti-union stance.
The potential consequences of this strike are far-reaching. The possibility of Amazon closing down the warehouse, citing unprofitability, is a real concern raised by many.… Continue reading
As a proud union worker, the idea of any fellow union member supporting Donald Trump in the upcoming election boggles my mind. It simply does not make any sense. Trump’s administration has been openly hostile towards unions, with a track record that clearly shows his disdain for organized labor. From his anti-union policies to his overall pro-corporate stance, Trump’s presidency has not been friendly to the working class, let alone union workers.
The fact that Trump even had gains with union voters in the first place is beyond comprehension. The Republican party’s longstanding anti-union rhetoric and policies should have been a red flag for any worker supporting them.… Continue reading
I have worked at a couple of these non-union plants in the South. From my experience, as soon as plant leadership gets a whiff of union talk, suddenly a plant-wide “bonus” materializes out of thin air. As of 10-12 years ago, that bonus was $5-7K for every full-time employee. It placates the masses and tampers down union talk for a year or so. That is how most of them keep out unions, at least for a while.
I was listening to some discussions about this on NPR and one of the people they interviewed was a younger woman who says her labor isn’t valued enough and an older guy who says they make good money and they have good jobs why jeopardize it.… Continue reading
It’s been a whirlwind of a week, to say the least. The news that salaried workers in previously exempt administrative and managerial roles making under $43k/year would now be eligible for overtime pay is a game-changer. And the fact that next year, those making under $58k/year will also be entitled to overtime pay is a significant step towards restoring fairness in the workplace. For the first time since the 1970s, the 40-hour work week is being preserved for the middle class, thanks to President Biden’s new overtime rule.
The introduction of the overtime rule is a clear expression of what Biden calls “middle-out” economics, a philosophy that aims to strengthen the middle class and ensure that hardworking individuals are properly compensated for their time and effort.… Continue reading
As someone who works in the mental health and local TV news industries, the recent decision by the FTC to ban noncompete agreements has significant implications for workers like me. In my field, it is common for employers to require noncompete clauses that limit our ability to seek better job opportunities and advance our careers. These agreements often force employees to move to different cities or even states in search of growth, leading to a loss of valuable local knowledge and expertise.
For journalists, the ban on noncompetes means that talented professionals can now stay in the same city, giving them a better understanding of the community they serve.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood