The Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by Kim Davis, the former Kentucky county clerk, who refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples due to her religious beliefs. Davis’s appeal, which sought to overturn the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision, drew attention amidst concerns about the court potentially revisiting the landmark ruling. Though Davis argued her religious freedom was violated, the court did not address the larger question of overturning the Obergefell decision, as the court has a conservative majority and Justice Alito, who authored the abortion ruling, indicated he was not pushing for Obergefell to be overturned. The justices dismissed the appeal without comment, leaving the 2015 decision intact.
Read More
The Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal from Kim Davis, the former Kentucky county clerk who refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, leaving the landmark Obergefell v. Hodges decision intact. This decision comes amidst concerns from LGBTQ advocates about the conservative court potentially revisiting the 2015 same-sex marriage ruling, especially after the overturning of Roe v. Wade. While the court did not explain its reasoning, the denial of the appeal maintains the constitutional right to same-sex marriage, leading to relief among LGBTQ+ advocates. The case focused on technical questions regarding religious protections, but the primary concern was whether the court would reconsider the Obergefell decision.
Read More
The Supreme Court is currently considering a challenge to the Obergefell v. Hodges decision, stemming from a case brought by Kim Davis, who refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. The court is meeting in private to determine if it will hear the appeal, which seeks to overturn the landmark ruling that legalized same-sex marriage. Despite the court’s conservative shift, signals suggest they may not be ready to revisit the issue so soon, considering reliance interests and the principle of stare decisis. However, some believe this is the beginning of a larger challenge to the decision, and LGBTQ advocates remain concerned about the potential for future legal battles.
Read More
The Supreme Court is considering a longshot appeal from Kim Davis, the former Kentucky court clerk who refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, potentially calling for a review of the landmark Obergefell v. Hodges ruling. Davis seeks to overturn a lower court order requiring her to pay damages for denying a marriage license, with her lawyers citing Justice Clarence Thomas’s calls to eliminate the same-sex marriage ruling. Justices like Roberts and Alito, who dissented in the original decision, remain on the court, with Justice Barrett suggesting that overturning same-sex marriage might be more complex than the abortion ruling due to reliance on the decision.
Read More
The Supreme Court is poised to consider a challenge from Kim Davis, the former Kentucky county clerk, regarding the legality of same-sex marriage. Davis, who previously defied court orders and was briefly jailed for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, is petitioning the court to overturn the landmark Obergefell v. Hodges ruling. A 2024 Gallup poll indicates that a majority of Americans support same-sex marriage, though partisan divides persist. The Supreme Court will decide whether to hear the case, with a decision expected as early as November 10, potentially setting up a significant moment for LGBTQ+ rights.
Read More
The Supreme Court is set to consider Kim Davis’ challenge to same-sex marriage at a private conference, marking the first time the justices will deliberate on the case. Davis, a former Kentucky clerk, refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, leading to a lawsuit and a subsequent jury awarding damages to the couple. The 6th Circuit rejected Davis’ appeal, citing that she was acting on behalf of the government, and therefore not protected by the First Amendment. Davis has requested the Supreme Court to review the decision, arguing her religious beliefs were violated.
Read More
Kim Davis, the former Kentucky County Court Clerk, has filed a lawsuit petitioning the Supreme Court to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges, seeking to appeal a ruling that requires her to pay damages for denying a marriage license to a gay couple. Davis, represented by the Liberty Counsel, argues her religious freedom is violated by the existence of marriage equality. Critics, like Dan Canon, believe the court is unlikely to take the case, although the current court is seen as politically motivated. The core argument, shared by some conservatives, is that the mere existence of same-sex marriage oppresses Christians, a perspective that could threaten LGBTQ+ rights.
Read More
The Supreme Court formally faces a new challenge: an appeal to overturn the landmark ruling that legalized same-sex marriage. And the person spearheading this effort is Kim Davis, the former county clerk who famously refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. It’s a situation that has reignited old debates and stirred up a lot of strong feelings on all sides.
The central argument Davis is putting forth is based on religious freedom. She asserts that her First Amendment right to practice her religion should shield her from personal liability for refusing to grant marriage licenses to same-sex couples. This is a complex legal argument, and it brings up a fundamental tension between religious freedom and the principle of equal treatment under the law.… Continue reading
Kim Davis’s appeal against a $100,000 judgment for denying same-sex marriage licenses was argued before the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. Her lawyer, Mat Staver, argued that the payment is unwarranted, citing the First Amendment and questioning the quantifiability of emotional distress. Conversely, the plaintiffs’ attorney contended that Davis violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights while acting under color of law, emphasizing that her actions weren’t protected by the First Amendment in her official capacity. Staver aims to reach the Supreme Court, hoping to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges using similar reasoning as the overturning of Roe v. Wade.
Read More
Kim Davis’ legal team pushing to overturn Obergefell, citing the Dobbs decision, is a grotesque example of how some individuals will go to great lengths to deny happiness and basic rights to others. Despite the landmark ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide, Davis, known for her staunch opposition to issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, is attempting to dismantle this fundamental right. The audacity of her legal team to cite the recent Dobbs decision as a precedent to challenge marriage equality is not only disturbing but also highly concerning.
The Respect for Marriage Act was put in place to safeguard same-sex marriage, regardless of Obergefell being overturned.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood