Was 40-year-old Trump recruited by the KGB? This question, while seemingly outlandish, deserves serious consideration given the extensive evidence of his pro-Russia stance and actions throughout his career. The sheer volume of incidents raises questions about the nature of his relationship with Russia, far beyond mere coincidence or simple admiration for authoritarian leaders.
The idea of formal recruitment, involving clandestine meetings and promises of power, seems less likely than a more subtle approach. Trump’s well-documented susceptibility to flattery and his insatiable need for admiration create a fertile ground for manipulation. Perhaps the KGB, or its successor agency, identified Trump as a valuable individual to cultivate, someone whose ego could be strategically leveraged.… Continue reading
Edward Coristine, a 19-year-old “senior advisor” to the US State Department and Department of Homeland Security, is under scrutiny due to his controversial past and family history. A new report reveals Coristine, who boasts the nickname “Big Balls,” is the grandson of a KGB officer executed as a double agent. His past includes being fired from a cybersecurity internship for alleged information leaks and connections to cybercrime communities. This lineage and his current position raise concerns about national security given his access to sensitive information.
Read More
Alnur Mussayev, a former KGB officer, claims that Donald Trump was recruited as a Soviet asset in 1987. This assertion, supported by similar accounts from other former KGB officers like Yuri Shvets, alleges a long-term cultivation of Trump due to his perceived recruitability. These claims suggest the existence of kompromat on Trump, explaining his perceived leniency towards Russia and Putin. The accusations detail a process spanning decades, beginning with surveillance and culminating in alleged KGB influence during Trump’s rise to power.
Read More
This article revisits a 2018 claim suggesting Russian leverage over Donald Trump, potentially dating back to a 1987 Moscow trip. The author’s initial assessment of Russian influence was around 10-20%, now raised to over 50% based on Trump’s subsequent pro-Russia stances and confirmation from a former KGB spy. While the full extent of this influence remains unknown, the author now believes that even definitive proof would have had limited impact on public opinion or Trump’s political standing, mirroring the muted reaction to previously confirmed Russian kompromat. Ultimately, Trump’s inherent weaknesses and incompetence undermined any significant leverage Russia may have held.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker