Vice President Kamala Harris will certify Donald Trump’s 2024 election victory on January 6th, a duty mandated by federal law. This action contrasts sharply with her campaign rhetoric, where she vehemently denounced Trump as a threat to democracy and warned against his presidency. The certification occurs four years after the January 6th Capitol riot, fueled by Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Increased security measures are in place for the event, reflecting the heightened tensions surrounding the process.
Read More
Kamala Harris’s role in overseeing the upcoming electoral count is undeniably a significant event, particularly considering the context of Donald Trump’s presidency. It represents a conscious effort to restore a fundamental aspect of American democracy, a process that Trump deliberately disrupted. The very act of Harris taking on this responsibility signifies a return to established norms, a clear contrast to the actions of the previous administration.
The fact that this is even a noteworthy occurrence highlights the extent of the damage inflicted during the Trump era. The casual disregard for established procedures and the blatant attempts to subvert democratic processes have left a lasting impact on the political landscape.… Continue reading
Thousands are protesting in Washington D.C. this weekend to prevent Donald Trump’s inauguration, arguing that the 14th Amendment bars him from office due to his involvement in the January 6th Capitol riot. Led by Trump’s former staffer Jessica Denson and supported by legal experts, the “#14thNow” movement aims to pressure lawmakers to reject Trump’s electoral votes. Success would result in Vice President Kamala Harris becoming president. Legal scholars contend that sufficient congressional objection to Trump’s electoral votes, based on the 14th Amendment and the findings of the January 6th Committee, could disqualify him.
Read More
Vice President Kamala Harris will swear in a new class of Senators, many of whom previously spread false and defamatory claims about her during the recent election cycle. These Senators, including those who mocked her name and falsely accused her of various actions, will now participate in ceremonies presided over by the very person they attacked. This situation, while difficult, is a common experience for Vice Presidents, particularly those who have run for president. Harris, however, faces the added sting of seeing her fiercest critics gain power after a hard-fought election. Despite the unpleasant circumstances, Harris understands this is a standard part of the political process.
Read More
Kamala Harris faced significant opposition from segments of the Arab American community during her presidential campaign, with groups like the Uncommitted National Movement and the “Abandon Harris” campaign criticizing her perceived insufficient distancing from the Biden administration’s handling of the Gaza war. These groups felt Harris did not adequately address their concerns, leading many to vote against her or abstain from voting for president altogether, contributing to a significant shift in support towards Donald Trump in key demographics. While the Harris campaign cited outreach efforts and policy alignment, critics argued her messaging lacked a clear alternative vision and prioritized reaction to Trump’s rhetoric over proactive engagement with their concerns. The outcome left many feeling disillusioned with the Democratic Party and apprehensive about the incoming Trump administration’s Middle East policies.
Read More
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, speaking at an Equal Voice Foundation event, cited Kamala Harris’s presidential defeat as evidence of a broader attack on women’s progress. He highlighted regressive forces actively working against women’s advancement, emphasizing the need for continued efforts toward gender equality. Other speakers at the event, including MPs from various parties, discussed the need for increased female representation in politics and overcoming divisions within the movement. Trudeau reaffirmed his commitment to feminism and allyship in the face of these challenges.
Read More
Following the 2024 presidential election, many Black women expressed profound exhaustion and grief over Vice President Kamala Harris’ loss, a feeling amplified by the constant pressure to remain politically engaged. This exhaustion stems from a persistent sense of threat and the weight of expectation placed upon Black women to “save democracy,” leaving little room for processing the emotional toll of the election. Many are now prioritizing self-care and community support while bracing for the potential impact of the Trump administration’s policies on marginalized communities. The election outcome felt deeply personal, with feelings of betrayal and despair among many.
Read More
The Kamala Harris presidential campaign attempted to secure appearances on several non-traditional media outlets, including the popular YouTube show “Hot Ones,” but was rebuffed. “Hot Ones” producers reportedly declined due to a policy against political figures. In contrast, Donald Trump’s campaign successfully leveraged appearances on various podcasts popular with young men, a demographic Harris struggled to reach. This difference in media strategy, combined with Harris’s emphasis on traditional media, is being analyzed as a potential contributing factor to the election outcome. While Harris did appear on some podcasts, the campaign’s efforts to secure a high-profile interview with Joe Rogan ultimately proved unsuccessful.
Read More
Jerry Preston argues that Donald Trump’s electoral success against female candidates Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris, both of whom received roughly 227 electoral votes, suggests a societal resistance to electing a woman president. He posits that this resistance mirrors similar biases against women in religious leadership roles. Preston concludes that while women have made significant progress, the US is currently not prepared to elect a female president. A rebuttal linked within the letter disputes the central claim, suggesting other factors contributed to Harris’s loss.
Read More
Despite projections of a landslide victory, Donald Trump’s win was closer than anticipated, securing only a two-point margin over Vice President Kamala Harris in the popular vote. While this outcome is unfavorable for Democrats, it falls short of a complete repudiation of their party. The blame game within the Democratic Party is unproductive and obscures the larger challenges facing the country. We must move beyond finger-pointing and focus on developing strategies to block Trump’s agenda, particularly his plans for mass deportations, as signaled by his initial appointments to key positions.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood