CBS is countersuing Donald Trump, demanding his financial records in response to his $20 billion lawsuit. Trump’s suit alleges CBS deceptively edited a Kamala Harris interview to favor Democrats, violating Texas’ Deceptive Trade Practices Act. CBS argues the suit targets editorial, not commercial, speech, and that Trump’s Texas filing constitutes forum shopping. The countersuit seeks information on Trump’s business dealings and any conflicts of interest related to his campaign and Truth Social. Discovery will also examine whether the interview caused any confusion or damages.
Read More
President Trump’s amended lawsuit against CBS News, now co-filed with Rep. Ronny Jackson, alleges deceptive editing of a Kamala Harris “60 Minutes” interview, increasing the damages sought from $10 billion to $20 billion. The suit claims this editing constituted unfair competition under the Lanham Act, aiming to boost Harris’s appeal and harm Trump’s Truth Social platform. The complaint cites “doctored” footage presented as misleading advertising, violating both the Lanham Act and the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. This amended complaint, filed in Texas, includes a new claim of election interference and adds Jackson as a plaintiff affected by the alleged deceptive practices.
Read More
Donald Trump’s lawsuit against CBS and subsequent FCC investigation, stemming from a *60 Minutes* interview with Kamala Harris, are baseless. The released transcript fully refutes Trump’s claims of “election interference” and journalistic misconduct, revealing his accusations to be a misrepresentation of standard editing practices. CBS’s editing of Harris’s response to a question about Israel involved using a more concise portion of her answer, not replacing it with a fabricated one. The FCC’s consideration of the complaint is a concerning abuse of power, driven by Trump’s personal vendetta and a questionable interpretation of broadcast regulations.
Read More
The FCC’s release of the full transcript and video of Kamala Harris’s ’60 Minutes’ interview has sparked a firestorm of commentary, much of it focusing on the perceived hypocrisy of the situation. The release itself seems, to many, a strange use of agency resources, particularly given the existing concerns about potential news distortion across the media landscape. This isn’t just about the Harris interview; it’s about a broader question of fairness and consistency in how news is scrutinized.
The central controversy revolves around the FCC’s investigation into whether the ’60 Minutes’ interview was edited in a way that constitutes “news distortion.”… Continue reading
Compelled by the FCC chairman, CBS will provide unedited transcripts and camera footage of its Kamala Harris interview. This action stems from a $10 billion lawsuit filed by Donald Trump, alleging deceptive editing to favor Harris. The network maintains its editing practices were standard and denies wrongdoing, while press freedom advocates closely monitor the situation and potential settlement talks. Trump’s continued pursuit of the lawsuit, despite his election win, highlights the ongoing tension between the former president and media outlets. Similar past settlements between Trump and other media organizations have involved substantial financial payouts.
Read More
Vice President Kamala Harris’s outreach to Never Trump Republicans, while strategically sound, raises concerns. This collaboration, though not necessarily a Faustian bargain, may have gone too far, particularly regarding foreign policy and immigration. However, any potential negative impact on domestic policy is minimal, and voter demobilization is unlikely. The author ultimately concludes that Harris’s alignment with these Republicans, while potentially problematic in some areas, doesn’t significantly detract from her overall platform.
Read More
Readers are encouraged to submit news tips to The Daily Beast. The publication welcomes information from all sources. Submissions can be made through a designated online portal. This ensures a streamlined process for sharing potential news stories. All tips will be considered.
Read More
The 2024 election was marred by widespread voter suppression, disproportionately impacting voters of color. Millions of voters were purged from rolls, challenged by vigilante groups, or had their ballots disqualified due to minor errors. This suppression, estimated to have cost Kamala Harris at least 3,565,000 votes, likely changed the outcome in key swing states, resulting in a loss for Harris despite winning the popular vote. Without this suppression, Harris would have won the presidency with 286 electoral votes.
Read More
Incoming Vice President JD Vance’s family reached out to the current residents, Vice President Kamala Harris and Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff, regarding the Naval Observatory residence. While initial attempts to coordinate a visit were rebuffed, communication eventually occurred between the Vance team and Navy officials, followed by a conversation between Usha Vance and Doug Emhoff. Harris’s team cited a busy schedule and past circumstances, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the Capitol riot, as reasons for the lack of a formal invitation. This contrasts with the transition between the Biden and Pence administrations, where a visit was facilitated.
Read More
Donald Trump’s return to power on January 20th necessitates continued robust reporting. HuffPost is committed to providing free, essential news coverage of this new administration. However, this requires reader support to remain accessible to all. Readers can contribute financially or simply create a free account to help ensure the ongoing delivery of critical information.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood