The appointment of Jeffrey Davis, a former clerk for Justice Neil Gorsuch and self-proclaimed “Trump’s viceroy,” as a potential head of the Justice Department signifies a dangerous shift in the department’s direction. Davis’s lack of restraint and his aggressive stance against special counsel Jack Smith, who investigated Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election, are clear indicators of his intent to use the DOJ for retribution and political maneuvering. This appointment, coupled with the departure of many conservative lawyers who refused to participate in Trump’s efforts to subvert the law, highlights the growing influence of MAGA loyalists within the Justice Department, a trend that poses a significant threat to the rule of law and democratic institutions.
Read More
With President-elect Trump’s victory, the two federal cases against him are likely to be dismissed or delayed due to a longstanding Justice Department policy against prosecuting a sitting president. Special counsel Jack Smith is taking steps to conclude both cases before Trump takes office. The cases include charges related to election interference in Washington, D.C., and the alleged mishandling of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, Florida. While the latter case presents a more complex situation due to the involvement of other defendants and the potential impact on future special counsel appointments, the Justice Department may choose to abandon the appeal.
Read More
If re-elected, President Trump is expected to appoint an Attorney General who will prioritize his own legal protection and the advancement of a right-wing agenda. This individual would likely dismiss existing cases against Trump, shield him from future investigations, and target his perceived enemies. This strategy would extend beyond the Justice Department, potentially extending to the firing of dissenting civil servants and the implementation of extreme conservative policies. The outcome would be a complete dismantling of accountability for Trump and the advancement of a highly partisan agenda.
Read More
Elon Musk’s recent defiance towards the Justice Department is a striking example of how the powerful can sidestep legal boundaries with little fear of real repercussions. When he publicly told the DOJ to “go screw itself” in response to warnings about his $1 million lottery to support Donald Trump, it laid bare the uncomfortable truth about accountability for the elite. Here, we have a billionaire flaunting not just his wealth, but his apparent belief that the rules of the game don’t apply to him in the same way they do for everyday citizens.
Musk’s actions are not just a publicity stunt; they represent something much deeper and more troubling.… Continue reading
Judge orders Justice Department to return helmet, spear to ‘QAnon Shaman’
When news broke that a judge had ordered the Justice Department to return the helmet and spear to the ‘QAnon Shaman’, my initial reaction was a mixture of confusion and disbelief. The idea of a man who had played a role in the disturbing events that unfolded on January 6th being reunited with his cosplay accessories seemed frivolous and almost comical. However, upon further contemplation, I came to a realization that this decision, although controversial, is fundamentally grounded in principles of justice and legality.
The notion that the government should not unjustly withhold an individual’s property, regardless of their past actions or beliefs, is one that resonates with me.… Continue reading
Merrick Garland: an interesting figure in the realm of politics and law, serving as the Attorney General under President Biden’s administration. However, recent events and actions have led many to question his ability to effectively hold Republicans accountable for their bad faith actions. The recurring theme seems to be one of naivete, as he fails to confront their perfidy and plays into their hands time and time again.
From the mishandling of the special counsel report on Pence to the reluctance to take decisive action against wrongdoings, Garland has been criticized for being too weak in the face of Republican attacks.… Continue reading
Biden’s legal team recently took action by reaching out to the Justice Department to address what they perceived to be unnecessary digs at his memory. This move raises an interesting question about the role of personal opinions and partisan biases in official reports and statements.
Imagine if a report had been released during the Mueller investigation that, although clearing Trump of charges, included derogatory remarks about his physique and alleged misconduct towards women. It would have created an uproar, and rightfully so. The same standard should be held for Biden.
The facts of any case should determine whether charges are filed, not a person’s mental acuity.… Continue reading
Attorney General Merrick Garland says there should be a ‘speedy trial’ of Trump as the 2024 election looms. These words, coming from the highest-ranking law enforcement officer in the country, carry significant weight. They signal a sense of urgency to hold Trump accountable for his actions and ensure that justice is served.
However, the sentiments expressed in the comments above reflect the frustration and disappointment many Americans feel towards Garland. They highlight the perceived lack of action and delays in prosecuting Trump for his numerous alleged crimes. From the FBI resisting opening a probe into Trump’s role in the Jan. 6 insurrection, to Garland letting the statute of limitations expire on instances of Trump’s obstruction of justice, the criticisms are strong and valid.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker