Following the dismissal of the federal case against Donald Trump regarding his alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election, Attorney General Merrick Garland faced sharp criticism from left-leaning figures. The case was dropped due to the Department of Justice’s policy against prosecuting sitting presidents, a decision that special counsel Jack Smith supported. Critics argued that Garland’s perceived delays, including the timing of Smith’s appointment, contributed to Trump’s 2024 electoral victory and allowed him to avoid accountability. While the dismissal was without prejudice, allowing for future prosecution, the move sparked intense debate regarding Garland’s handling of the investigation and its broader implications.
Read More
Following concerns from its internal watchdog about widespread civil rights violations and potential racial profiling, the Justice Department has suspended the DEA’s airport passenger cash searches. The Office of the Inspector General found these searches, often conducted without warrants and based on factors like last-minute ticket purchases, created significant legal risks and wasted resources. The investigation highlighted problematic practices, including paying airline employees a percentage of seized cash, and the inability to determine racial bias due to incomplete data collection. This suspension will allow for an internal evaluation of the program’s legality and effectiveness.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith dismissed the January 6th and classified documents cases against Donald Trump due to Justice Department policy barring the prosecution of a sitting president, though the dismissals were without prejudice. While the Georgia election interference case remains, its viability is uncertain due to ongoing appeals. Consequently, Trump avoids legal consequences for several indictments, including a conviction, setting a concerning precedent for future presidents. This impunity, combined with potential political retribution against prosecutors, suggests a future presidency operating largely beyond legal accountability.
Read More
Federal prosecutors dismissed the two criminal cases against Donald Trump, citing Justice Department policy prohibiting the prosecution of a sitting president. This decision, spurred by Trump’s election victory, effectively ends the years-long legal battles initiated by Special Counsel Jack Smith. While the cases against Trump’s co-defendants may continue, the dismissal highlights Trump’s successful strategy of leveraging his presidential campaign to avoid prosecution. The decision was met with celebratory statements from Trump’s team, who cited the “political weaponization” of the justice system.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith dismissed all federal criminal charges against President-elect Trump, citing constitutional requirements for dismissal before inauguration. The dismissals were “without prejudice,” meaning the cases could be reinstated after Trump leaves office in 2029. While Smith dropped the appeal in Trump’s classified documents case, appeals remain for co-defendants. This action leaves open the possibility of future prosecution, although the likelihood of renewed cases remains uncertain.
Read More
In short, Trump’s vision for the Justice Department centers on weaponizing it against his political opponents, a plan heavily reliant on the willingness of his appointees, like Attorney General nominee Bondi, to participate. Bondi, despite a history of ethically questionable actions, maintains some ties to mainstream conservative legal circles, potentially creating future conflict with Trump’s demands. Experts predict this conflict will inevitably arise as Trump expects absolute loyalty, ultimately harming both Bondi and the nation.
Read More
Federal inquiry traced payments from Matt Gaetz to women, a fact substantiated by a document obtained by a major news outlet and a lawyer representing some of these women. This document, a chart detailing a complex web of financial transactions, depicts thousands of dollars flowing from Gaetz to a group of associates and women involved in alleged drug-fueled sex parties between 2017 and 2020. The payments, primarily conducted through Venmo, are visually represented connecting Gaetz and his associates to the women involved.
The details revealed in this chart corroborate earlier claims made by a lawyer representing two women who allege they received payment for sex with Gaetz.… Continue reading
Merrick Garland’s tenure as Attorney General is a catastrophic failure, eclipsing any concerns about Matt Gaetz’s potential appointment. Garland’s abject inaction in holding Donald Trump accountable for his actions leading up to and including the January 6th insurrection has irrevocably damaged American democracy. The slow-walking of investigations, the delayed appointment of a special counsel, and the overall lack of decisive action allowed Trump to not only escape consequences but also to regain a position of political power, threatening a potential return to the White House.
This isn’t simply a matter of differing political opinions; it’s a fundamental failure of the justice system.… Continue reading
Special Counsel Jack Smith and his team plan to resign before President-elect Donald Trump takes office, as the Justice Department generally does not charge sitting presidents with crimes. The looming question is whether Smith’s final report, detailing his charging decisions, will be made public before Inauguration Day. The report must be submitted to Attorney General Merrick Garland, who has the authority to release it. Although Smith’s office was moving forward with the election interference case against Trump, the Supreme Court’s ruling that Trump has immunity for some acts as president has hampered the investigation. Additionally, a case concerning classified documents was dismissed in July but remains on appeal.
Read More
The prospect of Donald Trump returning to the White House sends chills down the spines of many government officials, but within the Department of Justice, the fear is palpable. The sense of dread stems from the belief that Trump will install loyalists in key positions, effectively dismantling the existing system and replacing career civil servants with individuals whose sole qualifications are unwavering loyalty to Trump and a disdain for the status quo. This potential shift evokes images of authoritarian regimes like Hungary and Russia, where the erosion of democratic institutions has paved the way for unchecked power.
The fear is not unfounded.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood