Dems are calling for Justice Alito to recuse himself from Jan. 6 cases over the display of an upside-down flag. But let’s face it, simply calling on him to do so is not going to cut it. We need to remind Justice Alito, and others like Clarence Thomas, that the law requires them to recuse themselves when there is a conflict of interest. It’s time to stop treating Republicans with kid gloves and start holding them accountable for their actions.
There is a precedent for justices to recuse themselves when they have a direct conflict of interest, as seen in previous cases.… Continue reading
The Saga of Clarence Thomas and His Luxury RV Takes a Disturbing Turn is a story that has captivated the public’s attention, shedding light on the ethical lapses and questionable practices of one of the most powerful figures in the judicial system. Justice Clarence Thomas, facing a barrage of ethics scandals that have tarnished the Supreme Court’s reputation, has tried to downplay these issues as a result of the harsh and deceitful atmosphere of Washington, D.C. He has expressed his fondness for R.V.ing, using it as an escape from the nasty politics of the capital.
The latest development in this saga revolves around Thomas’s recreational vehicle, a symbol of his desire to break free from the constraints of Washington and connect with ordinary people.… Continue reading
I am deeply disturbed by the recent news that Justice Clarence Thomas has chosen not to recuse himself from another January 6-related case. It is incredibly troubling to see a Supreme Court Justice, whose duty is to uphold the rule of law and ensure justice is served, fail to remove himself from a case where his personal interests are clearly at play.
The fact that Justice Thomas’s wife, Ginni Thomas, played a role in the events of January 6th and is a known election denier should be reason enough for him to recuse himself from any cases related to this matter.… Continue reading
Justice Thomas missing the Supreme Court session on Monday with no explanation has sparked a storm of speculation and commentary across various platforms. The case being discussed, Snyder v. United States, is at the center of attention, dealing with the legality of using political gifts to influence court justices. The absence of Justice Thomas has led to a barrage of comments ranging from calls for his retirement to wild speculations about the reasons behind his absence.
It’s concerning to witness a Supreme Court Justice fail to show up for a crucial session without providing any explanation. The lack of transparency raises questions about accountability and commitment to the duties of the position.… Continue reading
Clarence Thomas absent from US Supreme Court with no explanation. The news of Justice Thomas’s absence from oral arguments regarding the acceptance of illegal gifts has sparked a flurry of speculation and conspiracy theories. It is indeed perplexing that a member of the highest court in the land would not provide a valid reason for their absence, especially when the cases being discussed are of significant importance in determining the ethical standards of the judiciary.
The lack of transparency surrounding Justice Thomas’s absence raises questions about accountability and integrity within the Supreme Court. It is concerning that a justice who has accepted numerous gifts from wealthy Republicans, the very individuals who may have vested interests in the cases being discussed, would choose not to participate in the proceedings without explanation.… Continue reading
yacht, and a million to his wife, but Ginnie Thomas later participated in the January 6th insurrection. The conflict of interest is clear, yet he refuses to recuse himself from cases involving Trump. The cravenness and corruption within the Supreme Court are a stark reminder that justice is not blind, but rather tainted by political bias and personal interests.
The deliberate delay in hearing Trump’s case, the manipulation of the legal system to protect him, and the complicity of conservative justices in aiding his authoritarian aspirations are all symptoms of a broader decay in our democratic institutions. The erosion of the rule of law in favor of partisan agendas is a dangerous precedent that threatens the very foundation of our society.… Continue reading
The recent news about Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas hiring a law clerk accused of racist conduct has sparked outrage and disbelief in many people. The hiring of Crystal Clanton, who was accused of sending a text message stating “I hate blacks,” by Thomas, a Black member of the court’s conservative majority, raises significant concerns about his judgment and values.
The fact that Clanton had previously worked for Thomas’ wife Ginni, a conservative activist, and had even lived with the Thomases adds another layer of complexity to this situation. It begs the question, why are they supporting someone with such controversial and reprehensible views?… Continue reading
I have been following the recent news about John Oliver offering to pay Clarence Thomas $1 million a year if he resigns from the Supreme Court, and I must say, the reactions and conversations surrounding this topic have been nothing short of fascinating. The idea of the general public pooling their funds to essentially bribe a Supreme Court Justice to step down is both audacious and thought-provoking.
Many have expressed disbelief at the notion that a mere $1 million a year would be enough to entice Clarence Thomas to resign from his position on the bench. After all, he already enjoys a lucrative lifetime appointment, complete with all the perks and privileges that come with it.… Continue reading
Democrats rip Clarence Thomas for not recusing himself from the Supreme Court Trump argument, and rightfully so. It is undoubtedly concerning that a Supreme Court justice would not take necessary steps to avoid conflicts of interest. The fact that Thomas’s wife was allegedly involved in the January 6th riots raises significant questions about his impartiality. How can he fairly evaluate Trump’s case when his own wife may have been complicit in the events leading up to the insurrection?
It is essential to maintain the integrity and credibility of the Supreme Court, and that requires judges who are not beholden to any personal biases or connections.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker