The news of two Supreme Court judges being shot dead in Tehran, as reported by the Iranian judiciary, is undeniably shocking. This event immediately sparks a flurry of questions and reactions, ranging from expressions of outrage to a chilling sense of foreboding. The immediate impact is a palpable sense of uncertainty regarding the future stability of Iran. Will this be an isolated incident, or a catalyst for wider unrest and instability within the country? The potential for escalation is certainly a significant concern.
The individuals targeted were reportedly linked to espionage and terrorism cases involving suspects with ties to the US and Israel.… Continue reading
Two senior Iranian Supreme Court justices, Ali Razini and Mohammad Moghiseh, were fatally shot in Tehran by a lone gunman who subsequently committed suicide. The attacker’s motive remains unclear, with preliminary investigations revealing no prior connection to the court. A bodyguard was also injured in the attack, and an investigation is underway to determine if accomplices were involved. The judiciary attributed the killings to the judges’ harsh sentences against terrorists, while the U.S. previously sanctioned Moghiseh for overseeing unfair trials.
Read More
Trump’s November 26th hush money sentencing has been called off, a decision that has sent shockwaves through the American judicial system and ignited a firestorm of public debate. The postponement leaves many questioning the very foundation of the rule of law in the United States. The sheer audacity of the move, coupled with the lack of readily apparent legal justification, fuels widespread outrage and cynicism.
The abrupt cancellation of the sentencing is perceived by many as a blatant disregard for the principles of justice and equality under the law. It raises serious concerns about whether the legal system truly applies equally to all citizens, regardless of wealth or political influence.… Continue reading
Pennsylvania Judge Angelo Foglietta has permitted Elon Musk to continue with million dollar cash giveaways in the swing states pending a decision by a federal court. Elon Musk is giving away cash prizes to registered voters who sign a petition to support the US constitution. District Attorney Lawrence Krasner filed a lawsuit against Musk, claiming he is running an illegal lottery.
Read More
When Donald Trump’s defense attorney, John Lauro, made the statement in court that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas had “directed” him in the election subversion case, it was a moment of shocking revelation. The mere suggestion that a sitting Justice could be involved in directing the defense of a former president raises serious ethical concerns. Justice Thomas’s note in the concurrence regarding the immunity ruling, seemingly to influence Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump-appointed judge, is a blatant example of potential manipulation within the judiciary system.
The fact that Lauro had to quickly backtrack and correct himself, stating that Thomas did not actually direct them, further highlights the gravity of the situation.… Continue reading
As I read about the story of an ex-teacher receiving a five-year prison sentence for threatening a Florida judge in an LGBTQ case, I can’t help but feel a mix of shock and understanding. On one hand, threatening a judge – no matter the circumstances – is never acceptable. The rule of law must be upheld, and any form of intimidation towards those in positions of power undermines the very fabric of our society. However, delving deeper into the context of the case raises important questions about the fairness and consistency of our judicial system.
The fact that the teacher, Thorn, made threatening phone calls to the judge, expressing anger and frustration over a ruling related to LGBTQ issues, is undeniably troubling.… Continue reading
I find myself wrapped up in the drama surrounding the oldest federal judge, a 97-year-old woman who is entangled in a battle with the bench trying to suspend her. The question that comes to mind is, why won’t she just retire gracefully? Age is not just a number, especially when it comes to making crucial judicial decisions. Imagine facing a legal battle where the judge overseeing your case was born in 1927. The sheer thought of that is unsettling.
The power that comes with holding such positions seems to have a grip on some individuals, preventing them from letting go. It’s a perplexing phenomenon that makes me question why certain individuals refuse to step down when they clearly should.… Continue reading
It is truly disheartening to see the recent decision by Judge Aileen Cannon to dismiss the classified documents indictment against former President Donald Trump. This ruling, handed down on Monday, raises significant concerns about the integrity of our judicial system. In her 93-page order, Cannon argued that the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith violated the Constitution, a claim that seems to be a thinly veiled attempt to shield Trump from facing accountability for his actions.
The fact that this case was dismissed on such flimsy grounds is deeply troubling. It is clear that Cannon’s decision was politically motivated, rather than based on legal merit.… Continue reading
As I delve into the troubling news surrounding Donald Trump’s plea for the Supreme Court to intervene in his criminal conviction, I can’t help but be bewildered by the audacity and hypocrisy displayed in his actions. States’ rights have long been championed by Republicans as a cornerstone of our democracy, yet here we have Trump seeking federal intervention in a state court matter. It’s a stark reminder of the blatant double standards and self-serving agendas that seem to govern the actions of some politicians.
The fact that Trump is calling for the Supreme Court to bail him out of a criminal conviction is not only alarming but also showcases his disregard for the rule of law.… Continue reading
The recent news about the court no longer accepting complaints about Judge Aileen Cannon after receiving 1,000 complaints in one week is baffling. As an ordinary citizen, it is disheartening to see the judicial system not taking these complaints seriously and dismissing them as part of an “orchestrated campaign.” The fact that legitimate concerns and grievances are being brushed aside is concerning and raises questions about transparency and accountability within our legal system.
The onset of complaints after Judge Cannon indefinitely postponed the start of the trial in the Trump case, where mishandling of classified documents is at the forefront, is not a coincidence.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker