The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Trump administration, allowing them to take steps to implement the proposal to end automatic birthright citizenship by limiting the scope of nationwide injunctions. In a 6-3 decision, the court determined that injunctions should apply only to the specific states, groups, and individuals that sued, enabling the policy to potentially proceed in states that did not challenge it. The ruling, which did not address the plan’s legal merits, sparked responses from plaintiffs who vowed to continue legal challenges, while the administration can now continue with its administrative work on implementation. The court also noted that the executive order would technically go into effect in 30 days.
Read More
Donald Trump’s “Big Ugly Bill” would drastically redistribute wealth upward, benefiting the rich at the expense of the poor and working class. The bill also includes a provision effectively eliminating the courts’ power to hold the administration in contempt, rendering judicial orders unenforceable. This would allow Trump to ignore court rulings, including Supreme Court mandates, with impunity. This measure, if enacted, would severely weaken the federal judiciary and effectively end checks on executive power, culminating in a de facto autocracy.
Read More
We are currently witnessing what many are calling the biggest judicial power grab since 1803, and it is a cause for concern for anyone who values democracy and the balance of power. The issue at the heart of this power struggle is the Chevron deference, a precedent established in 1984 that requires courts to defer to an agency’s interpretation of the law. However, this long-standing doctrine is now being challenged, and the ramifications of its potential downfall could be far-reaching.
The conservative shift in recent years has seen a change in attitude towards Chevron deference. Conservatives, who once championed the doctrine as a way to ensure that power remains in the hands of elected officials, have now started to view the unelected courts as a more effective means of controlling policymaking than the executive branch and its agencies.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker