Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito spoke with President-elect Trump regarding a former law clerk’s job application, a conversation that occurred before Trump filed an emergency appeal to delay his sentencing. Alito stated the call did not involve Trump’s pending case or any other matter before the Supreme Court. While recommending former clerks for positions is common, this instance is notable given the timing and the potential for criticism regarding the Court’s independence. The call has already drawn renewed scrutiny of Alito’s conduct.
Read More
Trump’s recent call for a New York judge’s disbarment following the advancement of his hush-money conviction is, frankly, astounding. The sheer audacity of demanding such action against a judge who is simply upholding the law is breathtaking. It speaks volumes about a mindset that views the judicial system not as a system of justice, but as a tool to be manipulated or discarded when it doesn’t deliver desired outcomes.
This demand feels less like a legitimate legal challenge and more like a tantrum. It’s as if the entire process is a game, and the rules only apply when it suits the person in question.… Continue reading
Chief Justice Roberts’ annual report strongly condemns the “dangerous” rhetoric from various political figures who suggest ignoring federal court rulings. This disregard, he warns, must be rejected, citing past examples of administrations, including those of Eisenhower and Kennedy, upholding judicial decisions even when adverse to their interests. Roberts specifically criticizes attempts to intimidate judges through unfounded accusations of bias. The report highlights this issue’s urgency as President-elect Trump’s administration begins, given his past criticisms of the judiciary and potential conflicts with upcoming Supreme Court cases.
Read More
Chief Justice Roberts’ condemnation of elected officials for intimidating judges rings incredibly hollow when considering the ethical quagmire surrounding the Supreme Court itself. His pronouncements on judicial independence seem less like principled pronouncements and more like convenient distractions from the serious ethical breaches within the court.
The sheer volume of unreported gifts accepted by justices, raising serious concerns about conflicts of interest, undermines any claim of impartiality. These aren’t mere minor infractions; they represent a systemic failure in accountability, a blatant disregard for the very principles of justice Roberts claims to uphold. This lack of transparency directly erodes public trust in the court’s decisions.… Continue reading
Judge James Andrew Wynn of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has withdrawn his January 2024 retirement announcement, opting to remain in active service. This decision, following the Senate’s failure to confirm his successor, makes him the first Democratic appointee to postpone retirement since the election. His action, along with similar postponements by two district court judges, has prompted accusations of misconduct from Republican allies of the President-elect. The judges’ decisions effectively prevent President Trump from filling these vacancies.
Read More
The news that Aileen Cannon is being considered as a candidate for Attorney General under Donald Trump is nothing short of mind-boggling. It feels like we are witnessing a live-action illustration of the words “insane” echoing through the corridors of American governance. The implications of such a move are staggering. Cannon already has a track record of loyalty to Trump, including her dismissal of federal charges against him regarding the mishandling of classified documents. This relationship raises many ethical and constitutional concerns.
Cannon’s potential elevation to AG appears to be a form of reward for her judicial decisions that have repeatedly favored Trump, creating a dangerous precedent where the independence of the judiciary is overshadowed by partisan politics.… Continue reading
As an outsider looking in, the idea of Australia becoming a republic seems like a monumental decision. The topic of monarchy versus republic is one that has been debated for years, and the recent discussion about King Charles not standing in the way if Australia chooses to axe the monarchy brings this issue to the forefront once again.
Australia, a country known for its historic ties to the British monarchy, has always had a complex relationship with its royal connections. The idea of cutting ties with the monarchy and becoming a republic is not a new one, and while some may see it as a symbol of independence, others may view it as a drastic and unnecessary change.… Continue reading
Donald Trump’s latest outburst claiming it to be “illegal” to criticize his Supreme Court appointees is nothing short of absurd. It begs the question: does he even understand the basic tenets of the First Amendment, or is he just conveniently ignoring them when they don’t suit his agenda? As an American citizen, I am deeply troubled by the idea that our elected officials, especially the President, would seek to restrict our right to freedom of speech and expression merely because they are being held accountable for their choices.
The notion that criticizing judges and justices should be punishable by “very serious crimes” is not only preposterous but also dangerous.… Continue reading
As I read about President Joe Biden’s call for Supreme Court reforms, including 18-year term limits for justices, I couldn’t help but feel a sense of relief and optimism. The idea of implementing term limits for justices seems like such a logical step in the right direction. The system was not designed for lifelong appointments, and the notion that someone could hold a position of such immense power for six decades is concerning. Term limits would ensure a turnover of fresh perspectives and prevent stagnation within the highest court of the land.
The proposed reforms by President Biden, which also include a constitutional amendment to clarify that no one, not even a former president, is above the law, resonate strongly with me.… Continue reading
As an American citizen deeply invested in upholding the principles of justice and accountability, the recent developments in the case involving former President Donald Trump and Judge Aileen Cannon have left me not only frustrated but also deeply concerned about the state of our democracy. The fact that Judge Cannon, appointed to the bench by Trump himself in 2020, has once again stalled proceedings in a case involving the theft and mishandling of classified documents is nothing short of a travesty. The implications of her actions, or lack thereof, raise serious questions about the integrity of our legal system and the extent to which political biases can influence judicial decision-making.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood