The Judicial Conference refused to refer Justice Clarence Thomas to the Department of Justice for investigation despite his failure to disclose lavish gifts and travel, citing jurisdictional concerns and claiming his amended disclosures addressed the issues. This decision effectively guts the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, which explicitly grants the Conference this referral power, leaving Thomas without accountability for his actions. The Conference’s assertion that Thomas is now compliant is contradicted by evidence showing continued omissions in his disclosures. This lack of accountability highlights the judiciary’s inability to police itself and foreshadows a likely lack of investigation by the incoming Trump administration, solidifying a system where powerful figures face no repercussions for ethical violations.
Read More
The Judicial Conference rejected requests to refer Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Justice Department for ethics investigations. This decision, outlined in letters to Senator Whitehouse and Representative Johnson, cited both justices’ amended financial disclosures and legal uncertainty regarding the Conference’s authority over Supreme Court justices. The Conference Secretary argued that Congressional authorization would be necessary for such referrals. Despite these actions, critics contend the Judicial Conference failed to adequately address whether Justice Thomas willfully violated disclosure laws.
Read More
The U.S. Judicial Conference declined to refer ethics complaints against Justices Thomas and Jackson to the Justice Department, citing the lack of clarity on whether such referrals are permissible and noting ongoing external investigations. Justice Thomas will adhere to updated disclosure guidelines for gifts and hospitality, addressing concerns about unreported luxury trips. Justice Jackson has already amended her disclosures. The Conference’s inaction underscores the need for Congress to establish a more robust mechanism for investigating judicial ethics violations.
Read More
A Senate investigation reveals widespread ethical violations and conflicts of interest among Supreme Court justices, both current and deceased. The report details numerous undisclosed luxury trips accepted by Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito, often from individuals with cases before the Court, with Justice Thomas’s gifts unparalleled in modern history. This behavior, facilitated by figures like Leonard Leo, highlights a right-wing ecosystem of influence peddling surrounding the Court. The report underscores the Court’s failure to self-regulate and calls for Congressional action to restore public trust, though such action is currently unlikely given the current political climate. The report cites specific instances of undisclosed travel, gifts, and political activity by justices and their spouses that created clear conflicts of interest.
Read More
The recent revelation regarding Florida Judge Aileen Cannon failing to disclose her attendance at right-wing judicial seminars raises significant concerns about the integrity and impartiality of our judiciary system. The fact that she presided over a case involving former President Donald Trump’s classified documents, without fully disclosing her connections to influential conservative organizations, is deeply troubling. It calls into question her ability to uphold justice fairly and without bias.
The lack of transparency in Judge Cannon’s actions is a disservice to the legal system and erodes public trust in the judiciary. The duty of a judge is to uphold the law and administer justice impartially, free from personal interests or external influences.… Continue reading
Judge Aileen Cannon failed to disclose a right-wing junket; this headline sounds all too familiar when it comes to the actions of certain judges who allow their political biases to influence their decisions. The recent revelation that Cannon did not fully comply with disclosure rules is just one more example of the corruption that seems to run rampant within the judicial system. The fact that this is not the first time she has failed to disclose trips sponsored by partisan organizations raises serious doubts about her integrity and impartiality as a judge.
The luxurious trips to Sage Lodge in Montana for legal colloquiums sponsored by George Mason University, which has ties to conservative donors, further solidify the perception that Cannon may have been influenced by right-wing interests.… Continue reading
In the realm of justice, the age-old saying rings true: it’s not what you know, but who you know. The recent revelation about the Kansas newspaper raid authorized by Magistrate Judge Laura Viar is a testament to the murky waters of influence and power that govern our legal system. Despite claims of contradiction and mystery surrounding the arrival of search warrants on her desk, Judge Viar managed to escape discipline without a clear, transparent explanation.
The implications of this secret exoneration raise grave concerns about the ethical standards upheld by judges, not just in Kansas but across the country. If those meant to interpret and uphold the law are shrouded in secrecy and conflicting explanations, how can we trust in the integrity of our judicial system?… Continue reading
President Biden’s recent announcement of a bold plan to reform the Supreme Court and ensure that no President is above the law is a monumental step in the right direction for our country. The proposal includes crucial changes such as the elimination of immunity for crimes committed by a former President while in office, term limits for Supreme Court Justices, and the implementation of a binding code of conduct for Justices.
The proposal to remove immunity for crimes committed by a former President during their time in office is long overdue. No one should be exempt from federal criminal indictment, trial, conviction, or sentencing simply because they held the highest office in the land.… Continue reading
Biden will announce Supreme Court reform plans on Monday. The idea of lifetime appointments to the highest court in the land is something I simply cannot get behind. It just doesn’t make sense to entrust one person with that much power for their entire life. The fact that Justices like Thomas and Alito are there without any real accountability for their actions is a real cause for concern. This upcoming announcement from Biden gives me hope for some much-needed change in the Supreme Court.
There has been talk of potential reforms such as establishing term limits or implementing a stronger code of ethics for Supreme Court Justices.… Continue reading
Joe Biden’s recent announcement to focus on Supreme Court reform in his final six months as president is a bold and significant move. The idea of establishing a binding ethics code alone for the Supreme Court would be a massive step towards ensuring transparency and accountability within the judicial system. The current situation where certain justices may potentially have engaged in unethical behavior, like Clarence Thomas with allegations of tax evasion, underscores the urgent need for reform.
There is a palpable sense of frustration among many Americans regarding the current state of the Supreme Court. The perception of the Court being captured by special interests and big money has eroded public trust in the institution.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker