I am absolutely appalled by the recent actions of Mar-a-Lago judge Aileen Cannon in scolding Jack Smith and promptly shutting down Trump’s gag demand, while threatening sanctions. It is alarming to witness a judge who appears to prioritize protecting Trump over upholding the law. The level of bias and favoritism demonstrated is truly disgraceful.
Cannon’s swift response to the situation reeks of corruption and manipulation. It is deeply troubling to see a judge who should be impartial and fair showing such blatant disregard for justice. The way she dismisses federal prosecutors and sides with Trump without hesitation raises serious concerns about her integrity and professionalism.… Continue reading
I am at a loss for words after reading about Aileen Cannon’s blatant pro-Trump bias in the legal system. The fact that she is slow-walking a case against Trump, giving injunctive relief that wasn’t even requested by his defense team, and seemingly bending over backwards to protect him is nothing short of outrageous. It’s clear that there is a level of corruption at play here that is deeply concerning.
It’s disheartening to see a judge who is supposed to uphold justice and the rule of law instead showing favoritism towards a specific political figure. The very foundation of our legal system is being undermined when judges like Cannon put their personal biases above the principles of fairness and impartiality.… Continue reading
It is absolutely absurd that 13 conservative judges, each appointed by Trump, have declared a boycott on hiring clerks from Columbia Law School simply because some students expressed their political opinions. Punishing an entire group of students for the actions of a few is not only unfair but also reflects poorly on the judges themselves. It’s outrageous to see judges, who are supposed to be impartial and uphold the Constitution, engaging in such discriminatory and politically motivated behavior.
The fact that these judges are willing to discriminate against potential clerks based on their school affiliation speaks volumes about their character and suitability for their positions.… Continue reading
The news of the indefinite postponement of the trial involving former President Donald Trump and classified documents has left many of us with a bitter taste of injustice. The fact that the trial could have concluded before the upcoming election, casting a shadow over his prospects, only adds to the frustration and suspicion surrounding the proceedings. It is disheartening to see how easily the wheels of justice can be stalled when powerful individuals are involved.
The involvement of Judge Aileen Cannon, who was appointed by Trump himself to the federal bench, raises serious questions about impartiality and conflicts of interest in the legal system.… Continue reading
It never fails to amaze me how quickly the tables can turn in politics. Just when you think you’ve seen it all, a headline like “‘They are calling her terrible names!’ Trump jumps to defense of Aileen Cannon” pops up, and you’re left scratching your head in disbelief. The irony of Trump, a man known for his relentless name-calling and insults, rushing to the defense of a judge is almost comical. It’s like the pot calling the kettle black, only in this case, the pot is a deeply flawed and hypocritical former president.
Aileen Cannon, the judge at the center of this controversy, has found herself under fire for her alleged bias and lack of qualifications.… Continue reading
The news of the Texas judge’s wife allegedly shooting her nephew dead for ‘overstaying his welcome’ at their home is truly disturbing on many levels. The idea that a dispute between family members escalated to such a violent and tragic conclusion is heartbreaking. One can only imagine the fear and confusion that must have been present in that moment, leading to such a drastic and irreversible action.
The fact that the judge’s wife resorted to using a gun to resolve the conflict raises serious questions about the role of firearms in our society. It is a stark reminder of the dangers of having easy access to weapons, especially in moments of heated emotions or disagreements.… Continue reading
It seems that U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon is playing a strategic game to favor Donald Trump in the mishandling of classified documents case. While the headlines may suggest that she shot down Trump’s claims under the Presidential Records Act (PRA), upon closer inspection, it becomes apparent that she is merely biding her time. Cannon’s rejection of Trump’s pre-trial motion is not a definitive dismissal of the PRA argument but rather a delay tactic in favor of the former president.
Amidst accusations of bias and misconduct, Cannon’s handling of the case raises serious concerns about the integrity of the judicial process.… Continue reading
The recent developments in the trial against Donald Trump have left me in complete disbelief. The actions of Judge Aileen Cannon are tantamount to undermining the very foundation of our democracy. The fact that she is willing to expose highly sensitive national security secrets to the jury or force them to find Trump not guilty is beyond comprehension. This blatant disregard for the law and judicial norms is a clear indication of her biased and prejudiced stance.
It is alarming to think that a judge, whose duty is to uphold the law and seek justice, is instead working towards a predetermined outcome that favors Trump.… Continue reading
Aileen Cannon might actually get herself kicked off the Trump classified docs case. The mere thought of this possibility brings a mix of hope and skepticism. Many are fervently wishing for this outcome, seeing it as a chance for justice to prevail. The arguments against her involvement in the case are strong and compelling. The potential risks of real-world harm and witness intimidation are not to be taken lightly, especially given the high-stakes nature of this particular case.
We find ourselves in a situation where the handling of classified documents and the prospect of witness intimidation are looming large. The idea that a judge appointed by the President could oversee a case involving said President seems inherently flawed.… Continue reading
Jack Smith is not holding back in his criticism of Judge Aileen Cannon’s recent ruling, and it’s hard to blame him. In a filing to Cannon, Smith expressed his concerns about publicly docketing unredacted discovery material, as it could potentially expose witnesses to threats and harassment. Smith argues that revealing the identities of witnesses in a case involving Trump, who has a history of intimidating individuals, would put their safety at risk. He points to previous cases involving classified evidence, such as United States v. Moussaoui in 2001, where restrictions were placed on access to classified information to protect national security.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood