Despite unanimous Senate passage and initial bipartisan House support, the JUDGES Act, aiming to address federal court staffing shortages by creating 63 new judgeships, now faces a presidential veto. Democrats reversed their support due to concerns that President-elect Trump would appoint 22 of the new judges, highlighting the intense political polarization surrounding judicial appointments. Republicans argue the bill is a necessary solution to a long-standing problem, while the White House cites concerns about the timing and potential motives behind the bill’s passage. The bill’s future hinges on whether a compromise can be reached to secure Democratic backing in the next Congress.
Read More
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s legacy includes a strategic appointment of numerous conservative federal judges, often prioritizing partisan alignment over qualifications. These appointments frequently yielded rulings favorable to Republican interests, particularly regarding voting rights. Current Democratic tactics, criticized by McConnell, mirror strategies he successfully employed during his tenure. The question remains whether future Republican leadership will adopt similarly aggressive partisan approaches.
Read More
Judges Max Cogburn and Algenon Marbley, facing potential replacement by a Republican president, rescinded their planned semi-retirements. This action, following stalled Senate confirmations due to home-state senator objections, prevents President Biden’s nominees from replacing them with judges potentially more aligned with his political party. Senate Republicans criticized the judges’ actions as partisan, while Democrats race to confirm judicial appointments before the Republican majority takes effect in January. A deal allowing the incoming Republican president to choose four appellate court vacancies was struck in exchange for support of Democratic district court picks.
Read More
McConnell cries foul over two Democratic judges rescinding their retirements following Trump’s victory, a move he labels as “open partisanship.” This accusation rings particularly hollow given McConnell’s own extensive history of partisan maneuvering, particularly regarding Supreme Court nominations. His outrage feels less like genuine concern for judicial integrity and more like a calculated response to actions that disrupt the power balance he’s carefully cultivated.
The hypocrisy is striking. McConnell’s pronouncements on decorum and norms seem to apply selectively, conveniently ignored when his own actions benefit his party. This blatant double standard fuels the perception of him as a cynical player, prioritizing political gain above any purported commitment to principles.… Continue reading
while in the same breath, be confirming this Handmaid’s Tale bitch under the silent acknowledgement that she is solely there to merge Government & Religion while resetting the bodily rights of women back 50 years.
This is what you get with nonsecular government. Religious fanatics and Fascists gaslighting the world and making us all feel bad that we would even think to test the most fundamental beliefs that will go on to effect every decision made by this LIFELONG appointment to SCOTUS.
Anyone who doesn’t see through this by now is exactly the type of sheep these false Shepherds love to take for all they’ve got.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood