Attorney General Merrick Garland directly countered Judge Cannon’s order preventing the release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report on the 2020 election investigation. Garland argued that co-defendants Nauta and De Oliveira lacked standing to challenge the release of Volume One, which doesn’t name them. He further asserted that no legal basis exists for blocking its release. By limiting the release of Volume Two to Congress, Garland addressed the defendants’ claims of irreparable prejudice, undermining the core of their motion.
Read More
As I delve into the ongoing saga of Special counsel Jack Smith’s appeal regarding the ruling that tossed Trump’s classified documents case, I am astounded by the intricate web of corruption and manipulation that seems to encompass this entire situation. The revelation of Trump’s blatant admission to possessing classified documents that were not declassified, alongside the evident delays and biased judgments made by Judge Cannon, paints a grim picture of a justice system that may be easily swayed by political influence.
The audacity of Trump’s actions, combined with the apparent judicial malpractice exhibited by Judge Cannon, creates a sense of urgency for justice to prevail in this case.… Continue reading
When I read the news about Judge Cannon accepting Trump lawyers’ request for an attorney-client privilege hearing, despite it being seen as another delay tactic by legal experts, I couldn’t help but shake my head in disbelief. The blatant display of loyalty to Trump at the expense of justice is appalling. It’s as if there is a deliberate effort to undermine the system and obstruct the course of justice. This is not about upholding the law; it’s about protecting Trump at all costs.
The sheer audacity of Judge Cannon to grant a hearing on a matter that has already been upheld by a federal judge speaks volumes about her intentions.… Continue reading
The recent news of Judge Cannon in the Trump documents case rejecting suggestions to step aside is both infuriating and disheartening. The blatant display of corruption and bias in this situation is a stark reminder of the broken and flawed nature of our judicial system. It’s truly sickening to witness a judge prioritize personal agendas over the pursuit of justice and fair legal proceedings. The very foundation of our democracy is being eroded by individuals who abuse their power and position for personal gain.
The fact that Judge Cannon has been allowed to continue presiding over this case despite clear conflicts of interest and questionable decisions speaks volumes about the state of our government infrastructure.… Continue reading
Being privy to privileged information and classified documents is a position of immense responsibility. As a former counterintelligence officer, I understand the gravity of possession and improper handling of such sensitive materials. The recent revelation that Judge Cannon removed text from an indictment referring to Trump sharing classified information is deeply concerning. When someone in a position of power deliberately tampers with legal documents, it raises serious questions about integrity and impartiality.
The implications of this action are alarming on multiple levels. It signifies a blatant disregard for established legal procedures and calls into question the judge’s ability to uphold justice impartially.… Continue reading
Any objective observer can see the blatant bias and corruption displayed by Judge Cannon in the case of Trump’s request to declare the special counsel’s appointment invalid. The fact that she is entertaining challenges to the special counsel, especially after being slapped down by the 11th Circuit previously, raises serious concerns about her ability to uphold justice objectively. It is alarming to witness a judge blatantly favoring the defendant, delaying the trial, and allowing threats against law enforcement agencies like the FBI and DOJ to go unchecked.
There is a clear pattern of behavior by Judge Cannon that indicates she is not operating within the bounds of judicial ethics.… Continue reading
I have been closely following the recent developments in the case involving the request for a gag order against Donald Trump in classified documents. The decision by Judge Cannon to reject the motion immediately caught my attention and prompted me to reflect on the implications of such a ruling. It is concerning to see a judge appointed by the defendant ruling in favor of him, raising questions about impartiality and fairness in the judicial system.
The manner in which Judge Cannon dismissed the motion, citing lack of meaningful conferral and professional courtesy, leaves much to be desired. The requirement for adequate time for evaluation and follow-up discussion is crucial in ensuring a fair and just legal process.… Continue reading
Shameless Judge Cannon May Have Killed Trump’s Classified Docs Case
The recent news surrounding Judge Alieen Cannon and her shady involvement in Trump’s classified documents case is not just concerning, but downright alarming. The role of a judge is to uphold justice and ensure a fair trial, but Cannon’s actions and blatant biases raise serious questions about the integrity of our judicial system.
The fact that Cannon has not recused herself from the case, despite her direct ties to the defendant, is a clear conflict of interest. The appearance of impropriety should be enough for her to step down, yet she continues to delay the trial indefinitely.… Continue reading
I find it absolutely baffling and infuriating that Judge Cannon has postponed the Trump case citing a backlog of motions that she herself failed to rule on. How can someone appointed to such a critical position in the judicial system be so blatantly incompetent and negligent in performing their duties? It is evident from the numerous motions and delays that Judge Cannon is in way over her head and is either grossly incompetent or corrupt, possibly both.
The fact that she has allowed Trump and his team to spam the docket with frivolous motions, failed to rule on them promptly, and then used the resulting backlog as an excuse to postpone the trial is not only unprofessional but also a violation of the rights of the defendants who have a constitutional right to a speedy trial.… Continue reading
It is truly mind-boggling that we are still dealing with the issue of Judge Cannon overseeing the Trump classified documents case. The conflict of interest is glaringly obvious, yet here we are, waiting for some decisive action to be taken. I wholeheartedly agree that a judge should never preside over a case in which they were appointed by one of the parties involved. It’s a clear conflict of interest that should have been addressed from day one.
The fact that Judge Cannon has been dragging her feet, delaying the trial, and making questionable decisions only adds fuel to the fire. It’s frustrating to see the legal system being manipulated in such a blatant manner.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker