journalism ethics

Wolff’s Epstein Ties: Accusations of Complicity and Delayed Revelations

Author Michael Wolff has responded to the release of emails between him and Jeffrey Epstein, explaining that his interactions were driven by the pursuit of a crucial story regarding Donald Trump’s character. The emails revealed Wolff offering advice to Epstein while also seeking journalistic information from the financier. According to Wolff, his goal was to understand Trump and persuade Epstein to share his knowledge about the former president, even if it meant appearing to be friendly with Epstein. Wolff stated that he viewed Epstein as a key to uncovering the truth about Trump and said his journalistic approach allowed him to “offer an entirely different view” on Trump, as well as try to get Epstein to go public.

Read More

BBC Director Resigns Over Editing of Trump’s January 6 Speech

This article offers an objective analysis of consumer shopping trends, with a focus on specific product recommendations and sales opportunities. The Shopping Trends team, separate from CTV News journalists, curates the information and may receive commissions from purchases made through provided links. Readers are encouraged to explore these curated selections, which could range from everyday essentials to seasonal items, all in an effort to provide value to the consumer. This article aims to inform consumers about potentially attractive purchasing opportunities, helping them to find the best deals.

Read More

Why Is Media Largely Silent on Trump’s Health Concerns?

Recently, Donald Trump’s absence from public view prompted speculation, yet major news outlets provided limited coverage. Critics like John Passantino questioned the media’s silence, contrasting it with the extensive coverage of Joe Biden’s health concerns. While rumors of Trump’s health circulated, some, like JD Vance, criticized the media, accusing them of misinformation. However, the article suggests a different perspective: that the media’s coverage was, in fact, overly cautious. Ultimately, the piece argues that responsible journalism on a president’s health requires skepticism, persistent fact-finding, and avoiding both sensationalism and unquestioning acceptance of official statements.

Read More

NYT Hit Piece on Mamdani Relies on Racist Source, Undermining Reporting

The New York Times faced criticism for publishing a story about mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani’s racial self-identification, sourced from an individual known for promoting “race science.” The Times article focused on Mamdani’s college application where he listed multiple races, and he explained his background as an American born in Africa. Controversy arose, however, due to the source, identified as Jordan Lasker, who the Times described as an academic. Reports show Lasker regularly defends race scientists and their arguments of racial inequality, using IQ tests to suggest inferiority. Critics argue that the Times downplayed Lasker’s extreme views and gave him anonymity, making the article questionable.

Read More

Trump’s Assault on the Free Press: We Must Act Now

Trump is fast dismantling the free press. We all have to stop him. This isn’t just about partisan politics; it’s about the fundamental right to access accurate information and hold power accountable. The erosion of a free press is a direct threat to democracy, and the current trajectory is deeply alarming.

Trump is fast dismantling the free press. The very institutions that are supposed to be our watchdogs are being systematically undermined through lawsuits, politically motivated investigations, and a constant barrage of attacks. This coordinated effort to silence dissent and control the narrative is a clear and present danger to the health of our democracy.… Continue reading

Over 100 BBC Staff Claim Anti-Israel Bias Amid Controversial Coverage of Gaza Conflict

Over 100 BBC staff members have accused the broadcaster of giving Israel favorable coverage in its reporting on the war on Gaza, criticizing it for a lack of “accurate evidence-based journalism.” The letter addressed to the director general and CEO also stated that failing to hold Israel accountable for its actions has resulted in the systematic dehumanization of Palestinians. The signatories included anonymous BBC staff and over 200 from the media industry, alongside historians, actors, academics, and politicians. They have urged the BBC to fulfill its editorial commitments, including challenging Israeli claims and providing historical context. The BBC defended its coverage, stating that it is transparent about any limitations in its reporting.

Read More

‘People are furious’: Bezos faces a Washington Post revolt after he reportedly blocked the paper from endorsing Harris

People are furious, and who can blame them? The revelation that Jeff Bezos, the owner of The Washington Post, reportedly blocked the paper from endorsing Kamala Harris in the upcoming election has ignited a wildfire of anger among subscribers and staff alike. Reading through countless comments expressing outrage over this decision, I can’t help but feel that it marks a serious breach of trust and a disturbing trend of corporate manipulation in journalism.

I’ve been a subscriber to The Washington Post for several years, primarily because I value its commitment to investigative reporting and its willingness to hold power accountable. However, the idea that Bezos intervened to prevent a candidate endorsement feels like a shot across the bow of journalistic integrity.… Continue reading

Editor resigns, subscribers cancel as Washington Post non-endorsement prompts crisis at Bezos paper

The unfolding crisis at the Washington Post feels deeply personal to me. It’s not just about the resignation of an esteemed journalist like Robert Kagan or the discontent simmering among the editorial staff; it’s about a blow to an institution I deeply respect. Living in the D.C. area for over four decades, the Washington Post has been a constant in my life. My parents read it, I delivered it, and I have been a loyal subscriber. Watching its gradual transformation from a respected news organization to what some now perceive as a platform for billionaire interests feels like a betrayal.

The decision not to endorse Kamala Harris has become a watershed moment for the paper, one that highlights the intersection of media, money, and politics.… Continue reading

IDF reveals: Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

The recent allegation by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) claiming that six Al Jazeera journalists are affiliated with Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) has ignited a firestorm of debate. Immediately, I am struck by the complexity of this situation. The intertwining of journalism and conflict raises a myriad of questions regarding trust and accountability in reporting, especially when the very institutions that should safeguard the flow of information become the subjects of such serious accusations.

IDF’s assertion that these journalists are part of terrorist organizations is both alarming and thought-provoking. It’s difficult to digest such a bold statement without credible evidence.… Continue reading

LA Times editorials editor quits after billionaire owner reportedly blocked paper from endorsing Harris

The resignation of the LA Times editorials editor in protest of billionaire owner Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong’s alleged interference with the paper’s endorsement process for Kamala Harris speaks volumes about the current state of journalism and the ethical dilemmas posed by concentrated wealth in media ownership. This situation feels like a stark reminder that the watchdogs of democracy can themselves become compromised when they are tied to individuals whose interests lie beyond the principles of a free press. Mariel Garza’s decision to step down is not just about her disagreement over a specific editorial decision; it is emblematic of a much larger battle for the integrity of journalism in this country.… Continue reading