Legal scholar Lisa Graves argues in her book, “Without Precedent,” that Chief Justice John Roberts has actively undermined American democracy to serve Trump’s agenda. Roberts, who once promised that no one is above the law, has consistently acted in ways that favor Trump, including decisions on presidential immunity and voting rights. This capture of the Supreme Court has been orchestrated by the right-wing legal movement, particularly the Federalist Society, resulting in a court that is out of step with the American people. Roberts’ actions, according to Graves, position him as a “Trumpire” bending the rules to aid Trump and consolidate Republican power.
Read More
Recent Supreme Court decisions have granted the president significant control over the executive branch, effectively allowing President Trump to demand the Justice Department transfer $230 million in taxpayer funds to his personal account. This power stems from the Supreme Court’s reinterpretation of the Constitution under Chief Justice John Roberts, establishing a unitary executive theory. While Trump claims these payments are compensation for investigations into his past actions, the article questions the ethical implications, especially as the DOJ officials involved were formerly Trump’s lawyers. This situation illustrates concerns about corruption and the potential for Trump to exploit this power for personal gain, with further implications if he gains control of other government entities like the Federal Reserve.
Read More
The United States is currently embroiled in a battle over partisan gerrymandering, with Republican-controlled legislatures redrawing districts to favor their party. This practice has led to calls for action, including a proposed ballot measure in California that would temporarily suspend the state’s independent redistricting commission. Despite overwhelming public disapproval of partisan gerrymandering, the Supreme Court, under Chief Justice John Roberts, has ruled against federal intervention in these cases, effectively allowing such practices to continue. This decision has exacerbated the issue, giving Republicans an advantage in the House and potentially hindering the democratic process. In response, California voters now have the opportunity to counteract these effects, which could shift the balance of power.
Read More
In 20 years under John Roberts, a dramatic rightward turn for the US Supreme Court has become painfully clear. The evolution of the court, particularly under his leadership, has been marked by a significant shift in its ideological direction, a move that has dramatically altered the landscape of American jurisprudence and, arguably, the very fabric of the nation. This transformation, as observed over two decades, represents a departure from the court’s historical role as a neutral arbiter and has led to deep concerns about its impartiality and the potential for long-term damage to the principles of fairness and equal justice.
The concerns regarding the Roberts court’s trajectory were flagged early on.… Continue reading
Fox News anchor John Roberts is currently hospitalized with a severe case of malaria, diagnosed on August 25th. Roberts reported experiencing intense body aches and uncontrolled shivering before seeking medical attention. He believes he contracted the mosquito-borne illness during a recent vacation in Indonesia. While undergoing treatment with IV artesunate, he described his condition as “up and down” with hopes to return to work by next week.
Read More
In the past few months, the Supreme Court, heavily influenced by Trump’s appointments, has issued a series of rulings, largely through the “shadow docket,” that have greatly benefited the former president, including granting him 18 straight victories. These decisions have allowed Trump to pursue his agenda and potentially causing immense suffering to millions. Critics, including prominent legal scholars, argue that Chief Justice John Roberts is overseeing the undermining of the rule of law. The current actions have led many, including legal scholars, to fear for the future of the court.
Read More
Chief Justice Roberts warned Georgetown law students that the rule of law is under threat, citing recent attacks against Supreme Court justices as exceeding acceptable criticism. He emphasized the rarity of the rule of law globally and historically, while acknowledging that criticism of court decisions is beneficial, provided it remains focused on legal arguments rather than personal attacks. Roberts’ comments followed attacks on justices, including Amy Coney Barrett, by President Trump and his allies, who have disregarded court rulings and even called for impeachment of judges. This behavior prompted a rare statement from Roberts defending the judiciary’s independence.
Read More
The Supreme Court ordered the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran migrant illegally deported despite a withholding order, but the Trump administration refused, citing El Salvador’s jurisdiction. This defiance followed a lower court order and constitutes a blatant disregard for judicial authority. The administration’s actions, including barring AP reporters from the Oval Office, demonstrate a pattern of ignoring court orders. This situation highlights the president’s disregard for the law and raises serious concerns about the rule of law within the United States.
Read More
Following a meeting between Donald Trump and Nayib Bukele, Trump falsely claimed a 9-0 Supreme Court ruling in his favor regarding the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, misrepresenting the court’s decision and refusing compliance. This action raises serious questions about the Supreme Court’s potential response and the integrity of the Department of Justice, which has shown a pattern of prioritizing loyalty to Trump over adherence to the law. The article highlights concerns regarding the Chief Justice’s awareness of this situation and the potential implications for the nation’s future. Ultimately, the Chief Justice’s understanding of the DOJ’s actions is crucial to determining the next steps.
Read More
Chief Justice John Roberts temporarily stayed a midnight deadline for the Trump administration to return Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man mistakenly deported to a dangerous El Salvadoran prison. The Justice Department argued that Judge Paula Xinis’ order overstepped her authority, claiming the administration lacked the means to retrieve Abrego Garcia from a foreign sovereign’s custody. While the administration admitted the deportation was an error, they contested the court’s injunction, framing it as part of a broader effort to impede the President’s agenda. The case is further complicated by a separate Supreme Court appeal concerning the deportation of Venezuelan migrants to the same prison.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood