During a recent Fox News interview, the initial broadcast of Donald Trump’s response to a question about declassifying the Jeffrey Epstein files was edited. The full answer, which later aired on a Fox News radio show, revealed Trump’s hesitation about releasing the documents, citing concerns about potentially false information and its impact on individuals. Trump expressed interest in the circumstances surrounding Epstein’s death. The discrepancy in the broadcast has raised questions, particularly given Fox News’s generally favorable coverage of Trump and the network has yet to respond to requests for comment.
Read More
The release of information about Jeffrey Epstein has sparked controversy, with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez labeling Donald Trump a “rapist” on X. This came after Trump and his administration faced backlash for stating that a “client list” did not exist. Trump and his spokesperson responded with harsh critiques of Ocasio-Cortez. This controversy follows Elon Musk’s accusation of Trump’s appearance in the Epstein files, and Trump’s recent dismissal of questions about the matter.
Read More
In a Truth Social post, President Trump defended Attorney General Pam Bondi and criticized internal squabbles within his administration regarding the Jeffrey Epstein files, urging MAGA to focus on his agenda. Trump accused his political adversaries of creating the Epstein file drama and attempting to hurt his administration, referencing their alleged involvement in other scandals. He further stated that Bondi is doing a fantastic job and that the administration should prioritize other matters, like the investigation into the 2020 election. The former president also backed FBI director Kash Patel, and urged them to focus on other topics.
Read More
In a memo released last week, the Department of Justice and the FBI stated there was no evidence of a “client list” or blackmail connected to Jeffrey Epstein, confirming his death by suicide and that no further information would be released. This prompted criticism from some on the US far-right, with Trump defending Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel against the backlash. Trump urged his supporters to shift focus away from Epstein, suggesting the investigation was a distraction, and instead focus on the “Rigged and Stolen Election of 2020.” While Trump dismissed the conspiracy theories, some within his inner circle like Dan Bongino were reportedly displeased with the administration’s handling of the matter.
Read More
Amidst growing controversy surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case, Representative Jamie Raskin plans to urge House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan to subpoena Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel, and Deputy Director Dan Bongino for questioning. This comes after a DOJ memo revealed there was no secret client list, contradicting earlier claims and fueling backlash from various groups. Raskin’s call for a hearing aims to uncover the truth and address public concerns, particularly those related to President Trump’s involvement or potential withholding of information. This situation has led to resignation rumors and internal frustration within the White House, as officials grapple with the fallout from their handling of the Epstein case.
Read More
Attorney General Pam Bondi faced scrutiny at a Trump Cabinet meeting after addressing the missing minute in Jeffrey Epstein’s jailhouse footage. Despite the release of a Department of Justice memo stating Epstein’s suicide and the absence of an incriminating client list, questions persisted regarding Epstein’s potential intelligence ties and the missing footage. Conservative media figures expressed disappointment in the lack of transparency, with some calling for Bondi’s resignation due to apparent inconsistencies and the incomplete view of the facility in the released video. The footage, which skips a minute and doesn’t show the moment Epstein was found, has raised concerns about potential cover-ups and incompetence in the handling of the investigation.
Read More
The Trump administration’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case has caused significant backlash within the MAGA movement. Supporters, particularly those deeply invested in conspiracy theories, feel betrayed by what they perceive as a dismissal of the issue. Figures like Steve Bannon warned that the failure to address the Epstein case could alienate a substantial portion of the base and impact future elections. This dissatisfaction stems from the belief that the case is crucial to exposing deep state corruption and determining who truly governs the nation.
Read More
Newly released surveillance footage of Jeffrey Epstein’s prison cell, intended to dispel suspicion surrounding his death, contains metadata suggesting it was edited using Adobe Premiere Pro. Analysis of the “raw” footage reveals it was stitched together from multiple clips and processed with the video editing software, raising questions about the chain of custody. Digital forensics experts question the footage’s suitability for court due to the alterations, despite the DOJ’s claim that the video covers the entirety of the time before Epstein’s death. The DOJ has not explained why the video was processed in Premiere, which, in the context of Epstein’s controversial case, further fuels speculation.
Read More
Representative Tim Burchett expressed his belief that files related to Jeffrey Epstein were destroyed by the Biden administration. These comments followed a DOJ and FBI review that concluded no “client list” of prominent individuals was found. Burchett suggested that the intelligence community under Biden had a history of misleading the public and that some “very prominent people” might have been implicated. Although the DOJ and FBI stated no further disclosure was warranted, the investigation continues to be a point of contention.
Read More
The Department of Justice released surveillance footage related to Jeffrey Epstein’s death, aiming to dispel conspiracy theories. However, analysis reveals the “raw” footage was likely modified using Adobe Premiere Pro, contradicting the initial presentation. Metadata indicates the file was assembled from multiple sources, saved repeatedly, and exported, raising questions about potential manipulation. While experts note the processing may have been for public release, the lack of explanation fuels existing suspicion, providing fresh fodder for conspiracy theories surrounding the case.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker