Senate unanimously approves bill to force release of Epstein files. It’s almost unbelievable, isn’t it? The Senate, in a seemingly unprecedented move, has unanimously agreed to a bill requiring the Justice Department to release all unclassified records related to Jeffrey Epstein. And it’s already heading to President Trump’s desk for his signature. The speed of this process is truly head-spinning. One minute, it feels like this issue is buried, and the next, there’s a flurry of action.
This is where the skepticism kicks in, and it’s warranted. The speed at which this is happening definitely raises eyebrows. It’s almost too convenient.… Continue reading
The House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly in favor of a bill on Tuesday compelling the Justice Department to release its files on Jeffrey Epstein. This decisive action followed months of effort to overcome opposition, including from former President Donald Trump and Republican leadership. Despite initial resistance, the bill garnered significant momentum, leading to its passage in the House and subsequent unanimous consent in the Senate. This legislative victory marks a crucial step in the pursuit of accountability for Epstein’s victims and scrutiny of law enforcement’s handling of the case.
Read More
Mark Epstein, Jeffrey’s brother, seems to be hinting at something significant, doesn’t he? The initial thought is that he should just spill it all. He knows far more than he’s letting on, and it’s natural to wonder why he’s choosing this moment to speak up, especially given the history. We all want answers, and it feels like he’s holding back, which only fuels suspicion.
The core of the matter is the assertion that Jeffrey Epstein had “dirt” on Donald Trump. What level of dirt would really worry someone like Trump? The implication is that this wasn’t just run-of-the-mill gossip; it was something substantial, perhaps even damning.… Continue reading
Epstein files bill passes resoundingly in House with only 1 no vote, and it’s hard not to be immediately suspicious. The swift passage, with such overwhelming support, practically screams of something being amiss. The lone dissenting vote, cast by Representative Clay Higgins, is already sparking intense speculation. Why did he vote no? What does he know that the others don’t? And what’s his angle in all of this? These are the questions buzzing around.
Epstein files bill passes resoundingly in House with only 1 no vote, and the immediate fear is that the files have been doctored, compromised, and scrubbed clean of anything that might incriminate specific individuals.… Continue reading
Trump threatens ABC News broadcast license after reporter asks about Epstein, and it’s hard not to feel a sense of bewilderment. The idea of a president, any president, going after a news organization’s ability to broadcast because of a question asked about Jeffrey Epstein is, frankly, shocking. It’s the kind of thing you’d expect to see in a dictatorship, not a democracy that prides itself on freedom of the press and the First Amendment. It really does make you wonder: what is he so afraid of?
Trump threatens ABC News broadcast license after reporter asks about Epstein, and the comments online are certainly revealing.… Continue reading
The House of Representatives overwhelmingly approved a resolution demanding the release of Department of Justice case files related to Jeffrey Epstein. This decision followed the release of Epstein’s emails, some of which mentioned Donald Trump. Despite initial reluctance, and a brief shutdown, the resolution gained momentum, and Trump eventually endorsed the release after previously opposing it. House Speaker Mike Johnson voted in favor of the resolution but expressed concerns about its shortcomings.
Read More
Amidst a vote to compel the full release of FBI files related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett expressed skepticism towards the recent shifts in stance by former President Donald Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson. Initially dismissing the investigation as a “hoax,” Trump now supports the file’s release, prompting Johnson to follow suit, a move Crockett believes is insincere. Crockett suggests that Trump and Republicans aim to stall the release, potentially through the Senate or by using ongoing investigations as a legal justification, despite their public pronouncements. Furthermore, concerns exist, including from Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, that Trump’s call to investigate others involved in the Epstein case may further delay or obstruct the file’s release.
Read More
Mark Epstein has alleged that the highly anticipated Epstein files are being edited to remove the names of Republicans, claiming the release is a “sabotage” of the documents. He stated an unnamed source informed him that the Trump administration is scrubbing the files to protect Republican officials, a claim that follows former President Donald Trump’s shift in encouraging their release. Additionally, Mark claimed that his brother had damaging information on Trump during the 2016 election cycle, further adding to the controversy surrounding the files. These allegations have surfaced amidst growing calls for transparency regarding the documents and the circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death.
Read More
This week’s White House Watch begins with a significant development in the Jeffrey Epstein case, as a House vote is expected on a bill to release related documents. Trump has surprisingly urged Republicans to support the bill, reversing his administration’s previous attempts to block the release. The legislation, which is likely to receive bipartisan support, would compel the Department of Justice to release the Epstein files within 30 days, barring redaction based on embarrassment or political sensitivity. Additionally, trade remains a “flashpoint” with the EU according to Trump’s top trade negotiator.
Read More
Donald Trump’s political resurgence was fueled by his perceived victimhood, including promises to release the “Epstein files” if elected. Despite a history of scandal and unpopularity, Trump initially maintained unwavering support, even in the face of incriminating evidence. However, there are signs that Trump’s ability to deflect scandal is waning, as anger surrounding his ties to Jeffrey Epstein persists and his support may be softening. The article suggests this shift is occurring despite his supporters’ previous tolerance of obvious falsehoods and damaging associations.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker