Massie: Trump ‘may be covering for some rich and powerful people’ in Epstein files. That’s a loaded statement, isn’t it? It’s not a matter of *if* Trump is protecting himself. It’s a matter of *how* he’s doing it, and the implications are vast. The consensus here seems to be that the primary motivation is self-preservation, with any other protection being a secondary byproduct of that.
And so, the conversation quickly pivots to Trump’s own potential involvement. It’s not a leap to assume he’s on the list. He was friendly with Epstein for years, and this connection is often cited. The idea that Trump’s actions are solely about keeping himself out of trouble resonates strongly.… Continue reading
The White House has issued a warning to Republican members of Congress, stating that pursuing the complete release of the Jeffrey Epstein files would be viewed as a “very hostile act” by President Donald Trump. Despite the release of over 33,000 documents by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, a bipartisan push led by Representatives Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna aims for full transparency. Massie, along with a few other Republicans, has initiated a discharge petition to force a vote on the full file release, facing pressure from the White House and the Speaker. Notably, some Republicans, including Marjorie Taylor Greene, have signaled support for Massie’s efforts, emphasizing their commitment to exposing those involved in the Epstein case.
Read More
The House Oversight Committee released over 30,000 documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, though a majority of the files were already publicly available. The release followed a subpoena from Chairman James Comer, who sought the “full, complete, unredacted Epstein Files,” yet notably did not subpoena former President Donald Trump. Democrats criticized the release, claiming it was a cover-up, while the released files included a video clip of a young woman recounting her experience and court documents from Ghislaine Maxwell’s case. The move comes as Congress returns from recess, with Epstein’s crimes and associated networks expected to be a prominent topic of discussion.
Read More
A rally in Washington, D.C., is expected to be attended by approximately 100 Epstein survivors and other victims of sexual abuse. This event coincides with a bipartisan effort in Congress led by Representatives Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna, aiming to compel the U.S. Department of Justice to release controversial files related to Jeffrey Epstein. The lawmakers plan a press conference and a resolution in the House, hoping to pressure the DOJ, with the House Oversight Committee also meeting with survivors and issuing subpoenas. The ongoing investigation seeks to uncover any new information on Epstein’s sex trafficking and its potential mismanagement by federal officials.
Read More
Mace leaves meeting with Epstein victim visibly upset, a scene that sparked immediate and intense reactions, as expected given the complex political climate and the sensitive nature of the subject matter. The visceral nature of the response, the shared sense of disbelief and frustration, really highlights the core of the issue.
It’s easy to see why so many people felt a wave of cynicism wash over them as they witnessed Mace’s apparent display of emotion. Many felt that the performance didn’t match the actions. There’s a prevailing sentiment that the tears, the averted gaze, were performative. That maybe the core issue was not the victims, but Mace’s own positioning.… Continue reading
Thousands of Epstein-related records from the DOJ have been released, according to the Oversight Committee, but the excitement is somewhat tempered, and it’s easy to see why. It seems we’re wading through a mountain of information, but the initial reaction suggests a significant portion, perhaps even the vast majority, of this “new” material is old news. We’re talking about information that’s already been out there in the public domain.
Apparently, the contents released, subpoenaed by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, primarily recycle information that’s been readily available for a while. The immediate sentiment, as you might expect, is a mix of disappointment and frustration.… Continue reading
Upon Congress’ return, Rep. Thomas Massie initiated a discharge petition to force a House vote on the release of files related to Jeffrey Epstein, following up on legislation introduced in July that aimed to mandate the Justice Department to release these documents. This effort, supported by Rep. Ro Khanna, seeks to bypass leadership and compel a vote with 218 signatures. While House leadership added a bill directing the House Oversight Committee to continue its investigation into the Epstein case, Massie criticized this move. The controversy has intensified calls for transparency and prompted a series of actions, including meetings with survivors and planned release of documents, as the public demands greater access to information.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker