The Department of Justice has only released a small fraction of the Epstein files, as revealed in a recent court filing. Despite a federal law mandating release by December 19th, only about 12,285 documents have been published. While the department cites the protection of victims’ identities and the vast number of documents as reasons for delays, Democrats have intensified criticism, accusing the Trump administration of “lawlessness” and demanding the release of unredacted files. Several key figures are also mentioned in these files, including Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, who is under investigation as well.
Read More
Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna and Republican Rep. Thomas Massie are bypassing Pam Bondi’s Justice Department to demand the full release of the Jeffrey Epstein files. They are intervening with the Southern District of New York, requesting a “special master” be appointed to oversee the document release. This action follows concerns that the DOJ’s delayed and heavily redacted releases are withholding critical information, including survivor statements and draft prosecution memos. Khanna and Massie are also considering holding Bondi in contempt of Congress, with the ultimate goal of exposing the rich and powerful men involved in Epstein’s crimes.
Read More
New reporting reveals that Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort played a crucial role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual predation, with young spa employees regularly sent to Epstein’s nearby mansion. While Trump claims he distanced himself from Epstein early on, the break appears to have been motivated by a formal complaint from a Mar-a-Lago employee about Epstein’s inappropriate behavior. This move occurred only after years of Epstein’s misconduct and after it became impossible for Trump to maintain plausible deniability. It can be inferred that Trump’s break with Epstein was entirely opportunistic, as Epstein’s actions were known within Trump’s inner circle long before his banishment.
Read More
According to a recent Wall Street Journal report, teenage spa workers from Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago allegedly made house calls to Jeffrey Epstein’s mansion. The report indicates that Trump instructed staff to treat Epstein favorably, despite him not being a club member. However, the house calls reportedly ceased in 2003 after an 18-year-old worker accused Epstein of sexual pressure, prompting Trump to ban him from spa services. The article also mentions a recent release of documents by the Department of Justice which contained unfounded and false claims against Trump, in addition to mentioning a disturbing account from a former limo driver.
Read More
A recent Wall Street Journal report revealed that Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club sent young female employees to provide massages to Jeffrey Epstein for years, despite these employees warning each other about Epstein’s inappropriate behavior, including sexual suggestions and indecent exposure. In 2003, after an 18-year-old beautician complained about being pressured for sex by Epstein, a manager informed Trump, leading to Epstein’s ban from the club. Notably, Virginia Giuffre, an alleged victim of Epstein’s, had been recruited from the Palm Beach club three years prior. The report also highlights that Trump’s second wife, Marla Maples, had also expressed concerns about Epstein’s character, and that other Mar-a-Lago employees were listed in Epstein’s address book.
Read More
Investigative reporter Julie K. Brown, whose work led to Jeffrey Epstein’s arrest, finds the revelations from the released Epstein files “worse” than anticipated, indicating a larger scope of involvement than previously known. The files, including photos of prominent figures, are prompting numerous new leads and tips, making prioritization challenging. Brown notes the suspicious nature of the government’s handling of the investigation, questioning why some information has been withheld and calling for further investigation, emphasizing that it should not be a partisan issue.
Read More
Following the release of Jeffrey Epstein files, House Oversight Committee Democrats have requested an explanation from the Department of Justice (DOJ). The request came after a journalist, known for her reporting on Epstein, discovered her flight information from 2019 within the released documents. The Epstein Files Transparency Act mandated the DOJ to publish investigative materials related to Epstein, a process that initially resulted in incomplete and non-searchable files. Despite the ongoing release of additional documents, questions persist regarding the DOJ’s handling of the files and the inclusion of the journalist’s personal information.
Read More
The Department of Justice has come under scrutiny following the removal of 16 photographs from the Jeffrey Epstein archive, including a file allegedly depicting Donald Trump with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Transparency advocates and Democrats are demanding answers, citing the suspicious timing of the redaction shortly after the release of new documents. The DOJ denies any political motives, claiming the removal was due to legal obligations to consult victims, however, the specific removal of file 468 is what has brought heightened scrutiny, fueling accusations of a cover-up. As the DOJ reviews the remaining evidence, the battle over what information is made public is expected to escalate.
Read More
A recent New York Times profile reveals further details about the strained relationship between Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and former President Donald Trump. Greene claims that her push for transparency regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case ultimately fractured their alliance, citing her advocacy for Epstein’s victims as the catalyst. A White House spokesperson responded to Greene’s comments, dismissing them as “petty bitterness.” Despite the friction, the Epstein Files Transparency Act, championed by Greene, was passed.
Read More
In December 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released an FBI tip alleging that Donald Trump witnessed the murder of a newborn child in 1984. This tip, submitted by a person claiming to have been trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein, stated that Trump was present when the child’s body was disposed of in Lake Michigan. Despite the authenticity of the document, the claims made within it have not been independently verified. Furthermore, the alleged events do not align with the established timeline of Trump’s relationship with Epstein, raising questions about the tip’s legitimacy.
Read More