Newly released documents from the Epstein estate reveal that Prince Andrew received a $200 massage paid for by Epstein the day before he and Epstein partied with Donald Trump. This information, included in a batch of documents released by Democrats on the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, adds to the ongoing scrutiny surrounding Prince Andrew’s association with Epstein. The timing of this new disclosure is particularly sensitive as it coincides with other revelations from the Epstein files and amidst internal divisions within the Royal Family regarding Prince Andrew’s role. The release also emphasizes the differing approaches to the situation between King Charles and Prince William.
Read More
Newly released documents related to Jeffrey Epstein reveal Elon Musk’s name listed as a potential visitor to Epstein’s island on December 6, 2014. The documents also name Prince Andrew as a passenger on Epstein’s private jet from 2000, alongside Ghislaine Maxwell. The files further show Epstein’s contact with figures such as Bill Gates, Peter Thiel, and Steve Bannon. This release follows the surfacing of an email from Sarah, Duchess of York, to Epstein, which caused her to lose her patronage.
Read More
Musk, Bannon and Thiel named in new Epstein estate documents. It’s hard to know where to start when diving into this, but the recent naming of Elon Musk, Steve Bannon, and Peter Thiel in new documents related to the Epstein estate is definitely a headline grabber. It’s the kind of story that makes you stop and really think about what’s going on. The documents, which have started to surface, are obviously packed with names, and the implication of these individuals raises a lot of questions.
Musk, Bannon and Thiel are not exactly household names when it comes to controversy. When you consider their connections to other controversial figures, the revelation feels less surprising.… Continue reading
Documents from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate, provided to Democratic lawmakers, reveal potential connections between the financier and prominent figures including Elon Musk and Steve Bannon. These documents include meeting schedules and mentions of Musk potentially visiting Epstein’s island, as well as flight manifests featuring Prince Andrew. While the inclusion of these individuals does not indicate wrongdoing, the release of these documents has prompted scrutiny and calls for further investigation. Democrats on the House Oversight Committee are committed to uncovering everyone complicit in Epstein’s crimes, whereas, Republicans on the committee have said the released information is old news.
Read More
Shakur fled to Cuba in 1984 after a period as a fugitive in the U.S., where she was granted political asylum. During her time in Cuba, she wrote extensively, including her autobiography, “Assata: An Autobiography.” In 2013, she was added to the FBI’s “Most Wanted” list. Her life and writings reflect the range of Black American responses to racial oppression, highlighting the importance of awareness in the fight for freedom.
Read More
The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has released partial records from the Jeffrey Epstein Estate, including phone message logs, flight logs, financial ledgers, and Epstein’s schedule. These documents mention potential contact between Epstein and notable figures like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Steve Bannon, and Prince Andrew. Further examination of the redacted documents, aimed at protecting victims’ identities, is underway. The documents reveal scheduled meetings with Thiel and Bannon, a potential Musk trip, and possible payments from Epstein to masseuses on behalf of Prince Andrew. The committee anticipates more documents in response to their requests.
Read More
Speaker Mike Johnson faces a looming government shutdown with no active negotiations. While the official explanation for the House’s recess is that Republicans have completed their work, a different motive may be at play. Democratic Representative-elect Adelita Grijalva’s victory in Arizona brings the House to 214 Democrats, and she intends to sign a discharge petition to force a vote on the Epstein Files Transparency Act. This could lead to the disclosure of information about the Epstein scandal, which the White House wants to avoid. Johnson’s decision to keep the House inactive may be a strategy to delay Grijalva’s swearing-in, allowing time to pressure Republicans to withdraw their support for the petition or to manufacture distractions from the issue.
Read More
In a recent development, former President Donald Trump is reportedly attempting to influence Republican congresswomen who have signed a petition to release government files related to Jeffrey Epstein. House Republican leaders are also working to halt the vote, as a bipartisan discharge petition, initiated by Representatives Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna, has gained enough signatures to force a floor vote. Massie has warned against procedural tactics to block the vote, emphasizing the importance of transparency. With Democrats gaining influence, the outcome of the vote, particularly with the uncertain stance of Representative Nancy Mace, remains to be seen.
Read More
The Trump administration’s efforts to suppress the Epstein story were marked by significant failures and internal confusion, as revealed by the Journal. A notable misstep included the Attorney General’s surprise announcement about having the Epstein list, catching White House staff off guard. Furthermore, the FBI’s attempt to limit further disclosure on the case backfired, generating more public interest and scrutiny. A White House official described the FBI’s statement as a disruptive event.
Read More
A Justice Department investigator, Glenn Prager, was recorded on camera claiming President Trump is shielding others implicated in the Jeffrey Epstein case. Prager stated that while he interviewed victims and reviewed Epstein’s itineraries, none implicated Trump in the crimes, but believes the president is protecting other individuals by being hesitant to release the files. Prager also stated that Bill Clinton was on Epstein’s plane when rapes occurred. The DOJ has since responded, dismissing Prager’s claims, citing his limited role in the department over 15 years ago.
Read More