Republicans refusing to swear in a newly elected Democrat is a blatant obstruction, and the implications are deeply concerning. It immediately brings into question the integrity of the entire process and raises suspicions about what they might be trying to hide. The fact that a duly elected official is being denied their right to serve, seemingly for political reasons, is a direct assault on the democratic process. It’s hard not to see this as a power grab, a deliberate attempt to undermine the will of the voters, and it’s all the more troubling given the context of the ongoing Epstein investigations.… Continue reading
Representative Greene, reflecting on her election, indicated that she was not endorsed by Trump. The Trump administration’s handling of the Epstein files has been problematic, with efforts to remove the former president’s name and involve Ghislaine Maxwell. This association with Epstein has caused a divergence from Trump’s usual unwavering support base. The Epstein case has raised doubts, thus undermining Trump’s influence with a significant number of his followers.
Read More
Marjorie Taylor Greene has found herself at odds with the White House over her support of bipartisan legislation to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein. Greene reportedly received a warning from a Trump official that supporting the legislation would be viewed as a “very hostile act.” Despite the pressure, Greene, along with other Republican representatives, signed a discharge petition to force the release of the files. The expected vote on the petition, which currently has 216 votes, could happen soon as Democrats push for its release, while Trump has distanced himself from Epstein and dismissed the efforts as a “Democrat hoax.”
Read More
Marjorie Taylor Greene, a prominent Republican congresswoman, has openly criticized the Trump administration’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, even after being warned by a White House aide to cease her efforts. Greene, along with a handful of other Republicans, has signed a bipartisan petition seeking further disclosure of documents related to Epstein’s crimes. This stance has led her to publicly question the administration’s actions and the information provided to Trump, even though she still considers him her “favorite president”. In addition to the Epstein case, Greene has expressed disagreements with the GOP on other policy matters, including the conflict in Gaza.
Read More
Newly released documents from the Jeffrey Epstein estate, obtained by Congressional Democrats, name Elon Musk and Prince Andrew. The files reveal an invitation for Musk to Epstein’s island in December 2014, and a flight manifest indicating Prince Andrew’s presence on a flight with Epstein in May 2000. Additional prominent figures, including Peter Thiel and Steve Bannon, are also mentioned in the documents. Prince Andrew has previously denied any wrongdoing, while Musk has stated he declined an invitation to the island.
Read More
Howie Rubin, prominent investment banker, charged with sex trafficking, is a story that’s sending ripples through various circles. It’s a jarring narrative, especially considering the position and perceived respectability associated with someone like a high-profile investment banker. The allegations are serious, involving accusations of Rubin orchestrating a sex trafficking operation. This inevitably brings to mind comparisons, particularly to the cases of Epstein and Maxwell, raising questions about the darker sides of wealth and power.
Rubin, a former top manager at Soros Fund Management, adds another layer to this complex situation. The mention of his previous employer is likely to trigger reactions, potentially leading to speculation about connections and the possible involvement of others.… Continue reading
The House Oversight Committee, comprised of Democrats, recently released documents from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate. These records include references to prominent figures such as Elon Musk, Steve Bannon, and Peter Thiel, as well as mentions of Bill Gates and Prince Andrew. The released documents consist of Epstein’s daily schedules, flight manifests, and ledgers documenting transactions. The committee has stated they are committed to uncovering all individuals associated with Epstein’s crimes.
Read More
Newly released schedules from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate indicate that Elon Musk was tentatively scheduled to visit Epstein’s private island in December 2014. Musk has denied the claim, stating the information is false, while the calendar entry provides no details about the planning or execution of the potential visit. The released documents also mention scheduled meetings with Peter Thiel and Steve Bannon, with none of those parties accused of any wrongdoing. These schedules, part of a wider release by House Democrats, are part of an ongoing effort to keep Epstein’s case in the public eye.
Read More
On July 8, 2019, Jeffrey Epstein faced charges of sex trafficking and conspiracy in New York City. Recently, the House Oversight Committee released partially redacted files related to Epstein, revealing names like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and Steve Bannon. These documents, obtained through a probe investigating the government’s handling of the Epstein case, included over 8,500 documents. The files contain itineraries and notes by Epstein detailing invitations, trips, and meetings with prominent individuals.
Read More
Newly released documents from House Oversight Democrats reveal Jeffrey Epstein’s connections with prominent figures, including scheduled meetings with Peter Thiel and Steve Bannon, along with a planned visit to Epstein’s island by Elon Musk. The documents, released amidst Republican efforts to halt the release of the Epstein files, are part of a larger push for transparency by Democrats. Concerns about protecting survivors’ identities led to some redactions within the documents. These revelations come as a House resolution for the Epstein Files Transparency Act is gaining momentum, facing opposition from Republican leadership and potential pressure on certain Republican co-signers.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker