The Justice Department has stated that a judge does not have the authority to appoint a neutral expert to oversee the public release of documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. This response was given in a letter to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, rejecting a request from Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, who co-sponsored the Epstein Files Transparency Act, citing concerns about the slow release of documents and potential criminal violations in the process. The Justice Department maintains that the representatives lack standing in the case to seek such relief, specifically because they are not parties to the criminal case. The Department expects to update the court soon about the progress of the release, attributing the slow down to the redactions of sensitive information.
Read More
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has reported “substantial progress” in its review of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, with over 500 individuals assigned to the task, including redactions. Despite the efforts, the review has experienced “inevitable glitches” due to the high volume of materials. The DOJ stated that the materials reviewed and redacted thus far include sensitive victim information and the department is coordinating resources across various offices using a centralized platform. The agency has already released 12,285 documents and has over two million documents undergoing review, with an additional five million records being reviewed.
Read More
During a visit to a Ford plant in Michigan, President Trump responded to an unseen individual who called him a “pedophile protector.” Video evidence captured Trump appearing to point and curse at the person, following up with a middle-finger gesture. This confrontation occurred amidst controversy surrounding Trump’s prior association with Jeffrey Epstein and his initial resistance to the release of Epstein’s files, despite later reversing his position. The Justice Department has since missed multiple deadlines for the files’ release, leading to continued scrutiny. Trump’s communications director characterized the response as appropriate given the circumstances, while the President has denied any wrongdoing.
Read More
Lord Mandelson stated he was “kept separate” from Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual misconduct due to his own sexuality, and he maintained he was unaware of Epstein’s actions. In his first interview since being fired as the UK’s ambassador to the US over his links to Epstein, he did not apologize to Epstein’s victims, asserting he was not “culpable” or “knowledgeable.” Mandelson also expressed regret for the victims who were not given the protection they deserved. He was fired after emails emerged showing supportive messages he had sent to Epstein after the American was convicted for soliciting prostitution from a minor.
Read More
The publisher presents a two-part briefing, revealing firsthand accounts of child trafficking, torture, rape, and murder within the Trump/Epstein ring, supported by audio recordings. Sascha Riley, a survivor trafficked within the ring, details the production of child pornography films, including a snuff film where a girl was killed. The publisher emphasizes the importance of truthful testimony, providing audio evidence and supplementary documentation. Actions were taken to alert authorities and safeguard evidence, including a meeting with the House Oversight Committee Democrat Office, to warn of escalating criminal activity.
Read More
‘Epstein files’ deadline lapses for third week, lawmakers press DOJ over delay… well, here we are again. It’s the third week past the deadline for the release of the Epstein files, and the pressure from lawmakers on the Department of Justice (DOJ) to get things moving is supposedly mounting. It’s almost becoming a recurring theme, isn’t it? The deadline comes and goes, and yet the files remain largely unseen. It’s hard not to feel a sense of déjà vu with this situation.
The fact that the deadline has been missed repeatedly raises a lot of questions. One has to wonder what exactly is causing these delays.… Continue reading
In a recent development, Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie have requested a federal judge appoint a special master to compel the Justice Department to release all files related to Jeffrey Epstein, citing the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The representatives expressed concerns over the DOJ’s failure to meet the December 19th deadline for full disclosure and questioned the accuracy of the department’s self-reported figures. They also noted the absence of required reports detailing redactions and withheld records, hindering effective oversight. Khanna and Massie are requesting the independent monitor to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the document production.
Read More
The newly released Epstein files reveal disturbing connections, including his involvement with the PBS special “Poetry in America,” where he discussed pedophilic romances with the director. These files expose how Epstein used his influence to rehabilitate his image and enable others. The Epstein elite, ranging from political figures to academics, exploited resources and exerted control over others. Ultimately, the narrative highlights not seduction, but coercion and force, with Epstein encouraging monopolizing behavior among his associates.
Read More
As Congress reconvenes, Democratic lawmakers are scrutinizing the Justice Department’s failure to meet the deadline for a report on the Jeffrey Epstein files. The department missed the January 3 deadline to explain redactions and provide a list of unredacted government officials and politically exposed persons named in the released materials. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer accused the Justice Department of withholding information, citing heavily redacted documents and a lack of key details on alleged co-conspirators. The Justice Department has yet to fully comply with the law that mandates the full release of the Epstein files.
Read More
Epstein files: 2 million records in various stages of review, DOJ says, and the situation feels like it’s spiraling, doesn’t it? The Department of Justice has stated they’re knee-deep in reviewing over two million documents related to the Epstein case. It’s a staggering number, especially when you consider the initial deadline for releasing these files was back in December. What’s even more concerning is the slow pace of the releases thus far, with less than one percent of the documents having been made public.
This whole process has brought a lot of things into sharper focus. It makes you wonder about the priorities, the speed at which things are supposedly being done, and whether there’s a genuine commitment to transparency.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood