Recent polling indicates a significant decline in U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s approval rating, plummeting 47 points in just ten months. The most recent survey, conducted shortly before the release of heavily redacted files associated with Jeffrey Epstein, revealed a record low approval rating for Bondi. This drop in popularity may reflect public dissatisfaction with the partial release of the Epstein files, as Democrats have called for the impeachment of DOJ officials, including Bondi. The continued decline in Bondi’s approval rating could potentially impact public confidence in the Trump administration.
Read More
A recently released FBI report from 1996 reveals Maria Farmer’s account of Jeffrey Epstein stealing nude photos of her sisters and threatening her, which was brought to authorities’ attention. The report detailed Epstein’s behavior and requests for pictures of young girls. Despite Farmer’s report, Epstein continued to abuse girls for years, and he wasn’t prosecuted for abusing teen girls until the mid-2000s. Annie Farmer, Maria’s sister, also testified about her own experiences of being groomed and abused by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The release of this document underscores the tragic consequences of inaction and the lasting impact of Epstein’s crimes.
Read More
Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie are seeking to hold Attorney General Pam Bondi in inherent contempt of Congress due to the Justice Department’s incomplete release of Jeffrey Epstein files by the specified deadline. The representatives, co-authors of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, assert the DOJ’s document release on Friday failed to meet the Act’s requirements, specifically regarding withheld files and unlawful redactions. Khanna and Massie are working to build a bipartisan coalition and aim to impose fines for each day the requested documents remain unreleased, emphasizing the importance to the victims and the failure to provide the full list of files. This action utilizes Congress’s power to compel compliance through fines or detention without involving the courts or executive branch.
Read More
The Justice Department recently released a trove of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, yet the release has been criticized for omitting crucial records. Missing from the initial disclosures are FBI interviews with survivors and internal memos explaining charging decisions, potentially hindering a complete understanding of the case. Furthermore, key figures associated with Epstein, such as Prince Andrew, are not mentioned within the records. While some new insights emerged, the absence of critical documents and the heavy redaction of information suggest that the release is merely the beginning of a prolonged wait for full transparency.
Read More
The US Department of Justice (DoJ) has been accused of concealing the extent of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, sparking controversy. After a law mandated the release of Epstein-related documents, the DoJ released heavily redacted files, drawing criticism. Numerous files, including images of Trump with Epstein and others, were removed from the DoJ’s website hours after being uploaded, further fueling suspicion. Lawmakers are now drafting articles of impeachment against the Attorney General, and even Trump’s supporters are expressing anger over the limited disclosures, as the alleged cover-up seems to be backfiring.
Read More
Following the failure to release all eligible Jeffrey Epstein files by the mandated deadline, Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie are taking action to hold Justice Department officials accountable. They are considering options such as holding Attorney General Pam Bondi in contempt, with Massie emphasizing this as the quickest way to achieve justice. Senator Tim Kaine, however, suggested utilizing other tools to compel compliance, like those in appropriations bills, rather than resorting to contempt or impeachment, while Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche stated that the department is working to redact victim information before a complete release. Despite the Justice Department’s stance, Khanna stated that they are building a bipartisan coalition to push for the release of all files, suggesting that a future administration could prosecute current officials who fail to comply.
Read More
The Justice Department’s public webpage for Jeffrey Epstein documents removed at least 16 files, including a photograph of Donald Trump, shortly after they were posted, without explanation. The missing files contained images related to Epstein, including one with Trump, Melania Trump, and Ghislaine Maxwell. These removals have fueled speculation and criticism, particularly from House Oversight Committee Democrats. Furthermore, the initial document release was criticized for lacking essential information and context, including FBI interviews and internal memos, offering limited insight into Epstein’s crimes and the decisions surrounding his case.
Read More
The survivor, speaking about the Epstein case, stated definitively that a cover-up is in place, though the specifics remain unclear. Despite the conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell, the survivor expressed doubts that justice has been fully served. She feels it is impossible that some higher powers were not involved or protected. Ultimately, the survivor’s testimony highlights lingering questions about the full extent of the alleged crimes and who else might have been involved.
Read More
The Justice Department removed at least 16 files related to the Jeffrey Epstein case from its public webpage shortly after posting them, including a photograph of Donald Trump with Epstein, Melania Trump, and Ghislaine Maxwell, without explanation. The removal sparked speculation about the government’s motives and what else might be covered up. The initial document release, which was part of a broader effort to increase transparency, provided limited new insights, omitting key materials like FBI interviews and internal memos, leaving many to question how the investigation was handled.
Read More
Following the release of the Epstein files, survivors expressed disappointment and skepticism regarding the process, fearing incomplete information and potential redactions. Some believe the Justice Department is not fully complying with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, and are concerned about a slow rollout of information. Human rights lawyers note that redactions may be in place to protect victims, though survivors generally want all evidence exposed. Congressman Ro Khanna has stated the release was incomplete and is looking at options to ensure compliance with the law, while the White House has stated they have been transparent, and will not be holding back any information.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker