The emergence of Donald Trump’s alleged birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein, featuring a crude illustration and signature, has created a setback for Vice President J.D. Vance, who initially dismissed the story as “complete and utter bulls–t” and questioned its authenticity. The House Oversight Committee has received a copy of the letter, which Trump denies writing and has resulted in a $10 billion lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal. Despite the letter’s release, Vance has not retracted his previous statements and has continued to attack Democrats, even after Democratic Congressman Ro Khanna called on Vance to take back his remarks.
Read More
President Trump’s decision to order a U.S. military strike that resulted in the death of 11 individuals on a Venezuelan boat in the Caribbean has ignited a dispute between Vice President JD Vance and Senator Rand Paul. The Navy claimed the boat was carrying members of the Tren de Aragua crime gang and was involved in drug smuggling, a claim that Trump used to justify the strike as a means of preventing drugs from entering the U.S. While Vance defended the action, Paul criticized the strike, questioning the justification of killing individuals without due process or trial, calling the stance “despicable.” The Pentagon has not yet released information publicly justifying the destruction of the boat.
Read More
Following a U.S. drone strike that killed 11 alleged Venezuelan drug traffickers, Vice President JD Vance dismissed criticism of the action, responding defiantly to accusations of war crimes. The strike, which President Trump authorized, targeted a vessel in international waters and was celebrated by the administration as a blow to the drug trade. Vance defended the use of military force, stating that killing cartel members protects U.S. citizens, while the Department of Defense, now nicknamed the “Department of War,” has also defended the strike, claiming it was done in defense of the American people. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has since bragged about the strike.
Read More
In a recent interview, Vice President JD Vance stated he is prepared to assume the presidency if a tragedy were to befall Donald Trump, citing extensive “on-the-job training” over the last 200 days. These comments follow recent concerns about Trump’s health, including visible bruising and swelling. Trump’s recent endorsement of Vance as the heir apparent to the MAGA movement has also added further speculation to the potential future of the presidency. The 25th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution outlines the succession process in the event of a presidential death or incapacitation, with nine prior instances of a vice president succeeding a president mid-term.
Read More
According to conservative political consultant Rick Wilson, a power struggle is unfolding within the MAGA movement as President Donald Trump’s age becomes a factor. Wilson suggests that Vice President JD Vance is strategically positioning himself to assume leadership, citing Vance’s recent statements and “rumors from the Trumpverse.” Despite denials from the White House and Vance’s office, these allegations coincide with observations of Trump’s physical decline, including visible bruising, swollen ankles, and mental lapses. Trump’s health has been attributed to chronic venous insufficiency and hand-shaking paired with aspirin, but these claims have been widely met with skepticism.
Read More
In a recent interview, Vice President JD Vance deflected criticism regarding President Trump’s refusal to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein, instead blaming the Biden administration for failing to release such information. Vance asserted that Trump has been transparent on the issue, despite the fact that the Trump administration stated earlier this summer that there was nothing else to release, including any “client list.” The backlash stems from the initial promises to release the files, despite the fact that Epstein’s arrest, death, and the subsequent controversy occurred during the Trump administration, before Biden took office. Vance also cited a recent interview with Ghislaine Maxwell, in which she denied the existence of a “client list” and vouched for Trump’s character.
Read More
Vice President JD Vance asserts his readiness to assume the presidency if needed, citing his recent “good on-the-job training.” He maintains President Trump is in excellent health, despite growing concerns about the 79-year-old’s physical and mental well-being. Critics point to Trump’s visible bruises, mental lapses, and recent diagnosis of chronic venous insufficiency as evidence of possible health decline. The White House has responded by having Trump’s former physician testify to the President’s health, although the doctor’s credibility has been questioned.
Read More
Reports indicate that former Ukrainian commander-in-chief Valerii Zaluzhnyi declined a phone call from U.S. Vice President JD Vance in early March, shortly after a tense Oval Office meeting. The refusal stemmed from a “principled position” and a desire for unity, according to sources, with Vance’s team exploring potential replacements for President Zelensky. Despite hinting at political interest, Zaluzhnyi has not officially declared his candidacy, but polls show significant public support for him. In addition, there are reports of meetings between individuals close to Donald Trump and other Ukrainian figures.
Read More
During a recent interview on Meet the Press, Vice President J.D. Vance offered a cryptic response when asked if he had discussed potentially succeeding President Trump. While avoiding a direct answer, Vance acknowledged conversations with Trump about the future, emphasizing their current focus on effective governance. He deflected further inquiries about the future of the MAGA movement by highlighting the upcoming midterm elections. Despite Trump’s silence on a successor, Vance is the clear frontrunner among Republican voters according to a recent poll, although Trump has also mentioned Marco Rubio as a potential leader.
Read More
During a recent interview on Meet the Press, JD Vance defended Donald Trump’s approach to ending the war in Ukraine through negotiations, advocating for concessions. In an attempt to illustrate his point, Vance incorrectly cited World War II as an example of a conflict that ended through negotiation, when in reality, it concluded with unconditional surrender. This statement drew criticism as it overlooked the actual historical events. The interview highlighted the potential shift in the US’s role to mediation, with a suggestion that Ukraine might need to make territorial concessions to end the conflict, a shift from Trump’s previous stance.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker